Skip to main content
Log in

Characterization of deformation behavior of thin-walled tubes during incremental forming: a study with selected examples

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

As an emerging flexible manufacturing technology, incremental forming of tubes has the ability to produce various tubular parts, including those that are difficult to integrally form using other methods. Due to the nature of hollow and thin-walled geometry, the deformation mechanism in the incremental forming of tubes is quite different from that of conventional incremental forming of sheets. This paper summarizes a list of typical tubing that can be formed incrementally and then examines the processes used to form four types of tubular parts, including axisymmetric expansion/reduction of tube ends, tube wall grooving, and hole flanging. This is done primarily from the perspective of phenomenology by using experiments and numerical simulation. Typical deformation behaviors of the workpieces were revealed and discussed. Three basic deformation modes in terms of variations in wall thickness, namely thinning (such as in end expansion), thickening (such as in end reduction), and invariant or almost constant thickness (such as in part of the wall grooving), were found to exist during incremental tube forming. Regarding the formability limits of the tube, incremental forming has its own advantages and disadvantages when compared with pressing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Green DE, Angara TS, Nurcheshmeh M, Wormald T (2012) A practical method to evaluate the forming severity of tubular hydroformed parts. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 62(9–12):965–980

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Hashmi MSJ (2006) Aspects of tube and pipe manufacturing processes: meter to nanometer diameter. J Mater Process Tech 179:5–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Tabatabaei SA, Shariat PM, Mosavi MM, Tabatabee SM, Aghajanzadeh M (2013) Optimum design of preform geometry and forming pressure in tube hydroforming using the equi-potential lines method. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69(9–12):2787–2792

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Allwood JM, Utsunomiya H (2006) A survey of flexible forming processes in Japan. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46(15):1939–1960

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Alves LM, Dias EJ, Martins PAF (2011) Joining sheet panels to thin-walled tubular profiles by tube end forming. J Clean Prod 19(6–7):712–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Yang H, Li H, Zhang ZY, Zhan M, Liu J, Li GJ (2012) Advances and trends on tube bending forming technologies. Chinese J Aeronaut 25(1):1–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Wen T (2014) On a new concept of rotary draw bend-die adaptable for bending tubes with multiple outer diameters under non-mandrel condition. J Mater Process Tech 214(2):311–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Hsieh HS, Lin J (2005) Study of the buckling mechanism in laser tube forming with axial preloads. Int J Mach Tool Manu 45(12–13):1368–1374

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Emmens WC, Sebastiani G, Boogaard AH (2010) The technology of incremental sheet forming—a brief review of the history. J Mater Process Tech 210(8):981–997

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang C, Xiao HF, Yu DH (2013) Incremental forming path-generated method based on the intermediate models of bulging simulation. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67(9–12):2837–2844

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ambrogio G, Filice L, Gagliardi F (2012) Improving industrial suitability of incremental sheet forming process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 58(9–12):941–947

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Matsubara S (1994) Incremental nosing of a circular tube with a hemispherical head tool. J JSTP 35:256–261

    Google Scholar 

  13. Teramae T, Manabe K, Ueno K, Nakamura K, Takeda H (2007) Effect of material properties on deformation behavior in incremental tube-burring process using a bar tool. J Mater Process Tech 191(1–3):24–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Wen T, Yang C, Chen X (2013) A method for producing special-shaped tubular parts based on dieless NC incremental forming process. Chinese patent, 201310005922.7

  15. Jackson K, Allwood JM (2009) The mechanics of incremental sheet forming. J Mater Process Tech 209(3):1158–1174

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Yao J, Murata M (2005) An experimental study on spinning of taper shape on tube end. J Mater Process Tech 166(3):405–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Almeida BPP, Alves LM, Rosa PAR, Brito AG, Martins PAF (2006) Expansion and reduction of thin-walled tubes using a die: experimental and theoretical investigation. Int J Mach Tool Manu 46(12–13):1643–1652

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Lu YH (2003) Study of tube flaring ratio and strain rate in the tube flaring process. Finite Elem Anal Des 40(3):305–318

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Leu DK (2000) The curling characteristics of static inside-out inversion of metal tubes. Int J Mach Tool Manu 40(1):65–80

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Rathinam N, Prabu B (2013) Static buckling analysis of thin cylindrical shell with centrally located dent under uniform lateral pressure. Int J Steel Struct 13(3):509–518

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Vasilikis D, Karamanos SA (2009) Stability of confined thin-walled steel cylinders under external pressure. Int J Mech Sci 51(1):21–32

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Li H, Yang H, Song FF, Zhan M, Li GJ (2012) Springback characterization and behaviors of high-strength Ti–3Al–2.5V tube in cold rotary draw bending. J Mater Process Tech 212(9):1973–1987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Miller G (2003) Tube forming processes: a comprehensive guide. SME, Dearborn

    Google Scholar 

  24. Orynyak IV, Radchenko SA (2007) Analytical and numerical solution for a elastic pipe bend at in-plane bending with consideration for the end effect. Int J Solids Struct 44(5):1488–1510

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Moshksar MM, Borji S (1994) End effect in the explosive forming of tubes. J Mater Process Tech 42(4):431–441

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Yang C, Wen T, Liu LT, Zhang S, Wang H (2014) Dieless incremental hole-flanging of thin-walled tube for producing branched tubing. J Mater Process Tech 214(11):2461–2467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Centeno G, Silva MB, Cristino VAM, Vallellano C, Martins PAF (2012) Hole-flanging by incremental sheet forming. Int J Mach Tool Manu 59:46–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Tong Wen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Wen, T., Yang, C., Zhang, S. et al. Characterization of deformation behavior of thin-walled tubes during incremental forming: a study with selected examples. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 78, 1769–1780 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6777-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-014-6777-4

Keywords

Navigation