Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

A new paradigm in large-scale assembly—research priorities in measurement assisted assembly

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents for the first time the concept of measurement assisted assembly (MAA) and outlines the research priorities of the realisation of this concept in the industry. MAA denotes a paradigm shift in assembly for high value and complex products and encompasses the development and use of novel metrology processes for the holistic integration and capability enhancement of key assembly and ancillary processes. A complete framework for MAA is detailed showing how this can facilitate a step change in assembly process capability and efficiency for large and complex products, such as airframes, where traditional assembly processes exhibit the requirement for rectification and rework, use inflexible tooling and are largely manual, resulting in cost and cycle time pressures. The concept of MAA encompasses a range of innovative measurement-assisted processes which enable rapid part-to-part assembly, increased use of flexible automation, traceable quality assurance and control, reduced structure weight and improved levels of precision across the dimensional scales. A full scale industrial trial of MAA technologies has been carried out on an experimental aircraft wing demonstrating the viability of the approach while studies within 140 smaller companies have highlighted the need for better adoption of existing process capability and quality control standards. The identified research priorities for MAA include the development of both frameless and tooling embedded automated metrology networks. Other research priorities relate to the development of integrated dimensional variation management, thermal compensation algorithms as well as measurement planning and inspection of algorithms linking design to measurement and process planning.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Muelaner JE, Maropoulos PG (2008) Large scale metrology in aerospace assembly. IN DET. Nantes, France

  2. Womack JP, Jones DT, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world. Rawson Associates New York

  3. Hounshell DA (1984) From the American system to mass production 1800–1932. The John Hopkins University, Baltimore

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kayani A, Jamshidi J (2007) Measurement assisted assembly for large volume aircraft wing structures. In: 4th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. Bath, United Kingdom. p. 426–434

  5. Pickett N, Eastwood S, Webb P, Gindy N, Vaughan D, Moore J (1999) A framework to support component design in jigless manufacturing. In: Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference & Exposition. Bellevue, Washington: Sae International. p. 1–4

  6. Bullen GN (1997) The Mechanization/Automation of Major Aircraft Assembly Tools. Prod Invent Manag J: 84–87

  7. Hogan S, Hartmann J, Thayer B, Brown J, Moore I, Rowe J, Burrows M (2003) Automated wing drilling system for the A380-GRAWDE. In Sae aerospace automated fastening conference and exhibition—2003 Aerospace Congress and Exhibition. Montreal: Sae International p. 1–8

  8. Calawa R, Smith S, Moore I, Jackson T (2004) Hawde five axis wing surface drilling machine. In aerospace manufacturing and automated fastening conference and exhibition. Sae International, St. Louis

  9. Hempstead B, Thayer B, Williams S (2006) Composite automatic wing drilling equipment (cawde). In Aerospace Manufacturing and Automated Fastening Conference and Exhibition. SAE International, Toulouse. p 1–5

  10. Neugebauer L, Conover D (2005) Automated fastening and milling machine for complex aircraft structures. In Aerotech Congress & Exhibition. Grapevine,Texas: SAE International

  11. Martin OC, Muelaner JE, Wang Z, Kayani A, Tomlinson D, Maropoulos PG, Helgasson P (2011) Metrology enhanced tooling for aerospace (meta): A live fixturing wing box assembly case study. In 7TH International Conference On Digital Enterprise Technology. Athens, Greece

  12. Burley G, Odi R, Naing S, Williamson A, Corbett J (1999) Jigless Aerospace Manufacture—The enabling technologies. In Aerospace Manufacturing Technology Conference & Exposition. Society Of Automotive Engineers, Bellevue

  13. Airbus. Global Market Forecast 2011–2030. 2011 [cited 2012 14TH May]; available from: www.airbus.com/company/market/forecast/

  14. Wynne R (2012) Aviation policy and geopolitics. Boeing: Seattle, doc

  15. Muelaner JE, Kayani A, Martin O, Maropoulos PG (2011) Measurement assisted assembly and the roadmap to part-to-part assembly. In 7th International Conference on Digital Enterprise Technology. Athens, Greece

  16. Kayani A, Gray I (2009) Shim for arrangement against a structural component and a method of making a shim, Airbus UK Ltd. Patent application number: US20080211185 20080916 patent number: US2009100791 (A1)

  17. Cadena C (2006) Determined to find a better way. Frontiers. 05(6)

  18. Whinnem E, Lipczynski G, Eriksson I (2009) Development of orbital drilling for the Boeing 787. Sae Int J Aerospace 1(1):811–816

    Google Scholar 

  19. SHI J (2007) Stream of variation modeling and analysis for multistage manufacturing processes. CRC, Boca Raton

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  20. Mazur M, Leary M, Subic A (2011) Computer aided tolerancing (CAT) platform for the design of assemblies under external and internal forces. Cad Comput Aided Des 43(6):707–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Maropoulos PG, Vichare P, Martin O, Muelaner JE, Summers M, Kayani A (2011) Early design verification of complex assembly variability using a hybrid—model based and physical testing—methodology. CIRP ANNALS—Manufacturing Technology. 60(1)

  22. Muelaner JE, Maropoulos PG (2011) Integrated dimensional variation management in the digital factory. In 7th International Conference On Digital Enterprise Technology. Athens, Greece

  23. Martin OC, Muelaner JE, Maropoulos PG (2010) The metrology enhanced tooling for aerospace (meta) framework. Manchester, UK

  24. Kihlman H (2005) Affordable automation for airframe assembly, in department of mechanical engineering. Linköpings Universitet: Linköping. p. 286

  25. delfoi. Boxjoint. 2012 [cited 2012 11TH July]; available from: www.boxjoint.se

  26. Muelaner JE, Martin O, Maropoulos PG (2011) Metrology enhanced tooling for aerospace (meta): strategies for improved accuracy of jig built structures. In Sae Aerotech. Toulous: Sae International

  27. Coe PA, Howell DF, Nickerson RB (2004) Frequency scanning interferometry in atlas: remote, multiple, simultaneous and precise distance measurements in a hostile environment. Meas Sci Technol 15(11):2175–2187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Coe P, Howell D, Nickerson R, Reichold A (2000) An FSI alignment system for the atlas inner detector and some extrapolations towards NLC. volume

  29. Gibson SM, Coe PA, Mitra A, Howell DF, Nickerson RB (2005) Coordinate measurement in 2-D and 3-D geometries using frequency scanning interferometry. Opt Lasers Eng 44(1):79–95

    Google Scholar 

  30. Young K, Pickin CG (2000) Accuracy assessment of the modern industrial robot. Ind Robot: Int J 27(6):427–436

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Summers MD, Green BJ, Holden R (2008) Program-controlled process, patent number: EP1899774 (A1)

  32. Rooks B (2001) Automatic wing box assembly developments. Ind Robot: Int J 28(4):297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Webb P, Eastwood S, Jayaweera N, Chen Y (2005) Automated aerostructure assembly. Ind Robot: Int J 32(5):383–387

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Ko BK, Cho HS (1985) Active force feedback control for assembly processes using a flexible and sensible robot wrist. Springer, Stuttgart, pp 571–577

    Google Scholar 

  35. Newman WS, Branicky M, Pao Y-H, Pao MBY-H, Birkhimer C, Chhatpar S, Wei J, Zhao Y (2001) Intelligent strategies for compliant robotic assembly. In proc. 11th Yale Workshop On Adaptive And Learning Systems

  36. BSI, Quality Management Systems—fundamentals and vocabulary (2005) In Bs En Iso 9000:2005

  37. Dutton B (1988) Best in class. Manuf Syst 6(8):14–15, 18–19

    Google Scholar 

  38. Pena E (1990) Motorola’s secret to total quality control. Qual Prog 23(10):43–45

    Google Scholar 

  39. BSI (2011) selected illustrations of gauge repeatability and reproducibility studies, In PD ISO/TR 12888:2011. doc

  40. BSI (2009) Quality Management Systems—particular requirements for the application of ISO 9001:2008 for automotive production and relevant service part organizations, in PD ISO/TS 16949:2009

  41. BSI (1999) geometrical product specifications (GPS)—inspection by measurement of workpieces and measuring equipment—Part 1: decision rules for proving conformance or non-conformance with specifications, In BS EN ISO 14253–1:1999

  42. BSI (1995) general metrology—Part 3: guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement (GUM), In PD 6461–3

  43. UKAS (2007) M3003—the expression of uncertainty and confidence in measurement. UKAS, doc

  44. Metrology, J.C.F.G.I., evaluation of measurement data—supplement 1 to the “guide to the expression of uncertainty in measurement”—propagation of distributions using a Monte Carlo Method. 2007

  45. European Commission: Research & Innovation—transport. Advanced low-cost aircraft structures. 2010 6th December [cited 2011 24th February]; available from: http://ec.europa.eu/research/transport/projects/article_3675_en.html

  46. Summers M (2005) Robot capability test and development of industrial robot positioning system for the aerospace industry. In Aerotech Congress & Exhibition. Grapevine,Texas: Sae International. p. 1–13

  47. Centner RM, Idelsohn JM (1966) Adaptive machining controls—where they stand today. Machinery (NY) 72(9):87–89

    Google Scholar 

  48. Simpson B, Dicken PJ (2011) Integration of machining and inspection in aerospace manufacturing. Institute of Physics, Sheffield

    Google Scholar 

  49. Mikhail EM, Bethel JS, Mcglone JC (2001) Introduction to modern photogrammetry. Wiley. 496

  50. Zhang D, Rolt S, Maropoulos PG (2005) Modelling and optimization of novel laser multilateration schemes for high-precision applications. Meas Sci Technol. 16: p. 5

  51. Calkins JM, Quantifying coordinate uncertainty fields in coupled spatial measurement systems in mechanical engineering. 2002, Virginia Polytechnic Institute And State University: Blacksburg. p. 226

  52. ASME, performance evaluation of laser-based spherical coordinate measurement systems, In B89.4.19. 2006

  53. Sandwith S (2007) Automating laser tracker calibration and technique comparison. In Large Volume Metrology Conference

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Laboratory for Integrated Metrology Applications (LIMA), Department of Mechanical Engineering, The University of Bath, Bath, UK

    P. G. Maropoulos, J. E. Muelaner & O. C. Martin

  2. Airbus, Filton, UK

    M. D. Summers

Authors
  1. P. G. Maropoulos
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. J. E. Muelaner
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. M. D. Summers
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. O. C. Martin
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to J. E. Muelaner.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Maropoulos, P.G., Muelaner, J.E., Summers, M.D. et al. A new paradigm in large-scale assembly—research priorities in measurement assisted assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 70, 621–633 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5283-4

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5283-4

Keywords

Search

Navigation