Skip to main content
Log in

Dynamic wireless passive strain measurement in CNC turning using surface acoustic wave sensors

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Wireless, passive and dynamic surface acoustic wave (SAW) strain sensors are especially advantageous in applications with harsh environments where complex force measurements are required. High frequency multiple axis force measurement during machining processes typically requires state-of-the-art piezoelectric dynamometer technologies. Integrating dynamometers and their associated measurement chains into the machining environment typically requires significant modification to the machine structure. In this paper, SAW sensors were developed for process monitoring operations. Single-axis continuous and interrupted cutting investigations were carried out using the SAW technology installed on cutting tool holders demonstrating high dynamic bandwidth strain measurement. SAW dual-axis oblique cutting measurements were carried out where four SAW sensors were set up as two differential pairs each measuring a single axis of applied force. Improvements in sensitivity and cross-talk compensation has been realised. High-frequency wireless passive realtime process signals are presented from a passive wireless SAW force measurement system successfully integrated into an LT15 Okuma machining centre. The paper aims to present wireless passive SAW technology as a potentially platform changing approach for process and tool condition monitoring applications in the future.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Byrne G, Dornfeld D, Inasaki I, Ketteler G, Knig W, Teti R (1995) Tool condition monitoring (TCM) the status of research and industrial application. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 44(2):541–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Marinescu I, Axinte DA (2011) An automated monitoring solution for avoiding an increased number of surface anomalies during milling of aerospace alloys. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 51(4):349–357

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Chen XQ, Li HZ (2009) Development of a tool wear observer model for online tool condition monitoring and control in machining nickel-based alloys. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45(7–8):786–800

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Dimla Sr DE (2000) Sensor signals for tool wear monitoring in metal cutting operations a review of methods. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(8):1073–1098

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Rehorn AG, Jiang J, Orban PE (2005) State-of-the-art methods and results in tool condition monitoring: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 26(7–8):693–710

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Oraby S, Hayhurst D (1991) Development of models for tool wear force relationships in metal cutting. Int J Mech Sci 33(2):125–138

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. El-Wardany TI, Gao D, Elbestawi MA (1996) Tool condition monitoring in drilling using vibration signature analysis. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 36:687–711

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Choi D, Kwon WT, Chu CN (1999) Real time monitoring of tool fracture in turning using sensor fusion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15:305–310

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Teti R, Jemielniak K, ODonnell GE, Dornfeld D (2010) Advanced monitoring of machining operations. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 59(2):717–739

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Axinte D, Gindy N (2004) Assessment of the effectiveness of a spindle power signal for tool condition monitoring in machining processes. Int J Prod Res 42(13):2679–2691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lin J (1995) Inverse estimation of the tool-work interface temperature in end milling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 35(5):751–760

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Axinte DA, Gindy N (2003) Tool condition monitoring in broaching. Wear 254(34):370–382

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Dimla Sr DE, Lister P (2000) On-line metal cutting tool condition monitoring: I: force and vibration analyses. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 40(5):739–768

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Jemielniak K, Urbaski T, Kossakowska J, Bombiski S (2012) Tool condition monitoring based on numerous signal features. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 59(1–4):73–81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Prickett P, Siddiqui R, Grosvenor R (2011) The development of an end-milling process depth of cut monitoring system. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 52(1–4):89–100

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Inasaki I (1999) Sensor fusion for monitoring and controlling grinding processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 15(10):730–736

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Garzon M, Adams O, Veselovac D, Blattner M, Thiel R, Kirchheim A (2012) High speed micro machining processes analysis for the precision manufacturing. Procedia CIRP 1:609–614. Fifth CIRP Conference on High Performance Cutting 2012

    Google Scholar 

  18. Kumme RR, Mack O, Bill B, Haab HR (2003) Investigation of piezoelectric force measuring devices in force calibration and force standard machines. Kistler Instrumente AG. http://www.researchgate.net/publication/235699236_Investigation_of_Piezoelectric_Force_MeasuringDevices_in_Force_Calibration_and_Force_Standard_Machines

  19. Jeong Y-H, Cho D-W (2002) Estimating cutting force from rotating and stationary feed motor currents on a milling machine. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(14):1559–1566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Dixon B, Kalinin V, Beckley J, Lohr R (2006) A second generation in-car tire pressure monitoring system based on wireless passive SAW sensors. In: International frequency control symposium and exposition, 2006 IEEE, pp 374–380

  21. Translogik (2012) Translogik off-the-road (otr) ‘itrack’ tyre pressure monitoring system (tpms). http://www.trans-logik.com/. Accessed 11 Sept 2012

  22. Beckley J, Kalinin V, Lee M, Voliansky K (2002) Non-contact torque sensors based on SAW resonators. In: Frequency control symposium and PDA exhibition, 2002. IEEE International, pp 202–213

  23. Transense (2012) High-speed torque sensing in car engines by means of saw resonators. SAW Symposium 2012. http://www.saw-symposium.com/wp-content/uploads/Kalinin.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2012

  24. Kalinin V, Lohr R, Leigh A, Becky J, Bown G (2010) High-speed high dynamic range resonant SAW torque sensor for kinetic energy recovery system. In: European frequency and time forum, pp 13–16

  25. Heinrich C, Hinrichsen V (2001) Diagnostics and monitoring of metal-oxide surge arresters in high-voltage networks-comparison of existing and newly developed procedures. Power Deliv IEEE Trans 16:138–143

    Google Scholar 

  26. da Cunha MP, Lad RJ, Moonlight T, Moulzolf S, Canabal A, Behanan R, Davulis PM, Frankel D, Bernhardt G, Pollard T, McCann DF (2011) Recent advances in harsh environment acoustic wave sensors for contemporary applications. In: Sensors, 2011 IEEE, pp 614–617

  27. Wolff U, Dickert FL, Fischerauer GK, Greibl W, Ruppel CCW (2001) SAW sensors for harsh environments. IEEE Sensors J 1:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Stoney R, Donohoe B, Geraghty D, O’Donnell GE (2012) The development of surface acoustic wave sensors (SAWs) for process monitoring. In: 5th CIRP conference on high performance cutting 2012, vol 1, pp 586–591

  29. Donohoe B (2011) The development of a surface acoustic wave strain sensor. PhD thesis, Trinity College

  30. Kino GS, Matthews H (1971) Signal processing in acoustic surface-wave devices. IEEE Spectr 8:22–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. White RM, Voltmer FW (1965) Direct piezoelectric coupling to surface elastic waves. Appl Phys Lett 7:314–316

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. Hirbsek MF, Tosic DV, Radosavljvic MR (2010) Surface acoustic wave sensors in mechanical engineering. FME Trans 38(1):11–18

    Google Scholar 

  33. Grossman R, Michel J, Sachs T, Schrufer E (1996) Measurement of mechanical, quantities using quart sensors. In: European frequency and time forum, 1996. EFTF 96., Tenth (IEE conf. publ. 418), pp 376–381

  34. Wolff U, Dickert FL, Fischerauer GK, Greibl W, Ruppel CCW (2001) SAW sensors for harsh environments. IEEE Sensors J 1:4–13

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Zwicker UT (1989) Strain sensor with commercial SAWR. Sensors Actuators 17:235–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Sinha BK, Tanski WJ, Lukaszek T, Ballato A (1983) Stress induced effects on the propagation of surface waves. In: 37th annual symposium on frequency control 1983, pp 415–422

  37. Pohl A, Seifert F (1997) Wirelessly interrogable surface acoustic wave sensors for vehicular applications. IEEE Trans Instrum Meas 46:1031–1038

    Google Scholar 

  38. Donohoe B, Geraghty D, O’Donnell GE (2011) Wireless calibration of a surface acoustic wave resonator as a strain sensor. IEEE Sensors J 11:1026–1032

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Hamsch M, Hoffmann R, Buff W, Binhack M, Klett S (2004) An interrogation unit for passive wireless SAW sensors based on Fourier transform. IEEE Trans Ultrason Ferroelectr Freq Control 51(11):1449–1456

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Reindl L, Shrena I, Kenshil S, Peter R (2003) Wireless measurement of temperature using surface acoustic waves sensors. In: Frequency control symposium and PDA exhibition jointly with the 17th European frequency and time forum, 2003. Proceedings of the 2003 IEEE international, pp 935–941

  41. SENSeOR (2012) Accurate wireless temperature measurements using passive saw sensors and a frequency modulation interrogation approach. FEMTO-ST. http://www.saw-symposium.com/wp-content/uploads/Sylvain_Ballandras_FEMTO-ST.pdf. Accessed 11 Sept 2012

  42. Friedt J-M, Droit C, Ballandras S, Alzuaga S, Martin G, Sandoz P (2012) Remote vibration measurement: wireless passive surface acoustic wave resonator fast probing strategy. Rev Sci Instrum 83(5):055001

    Article  Google Scholar 

  43. Buff W, Rusko M, Goroll E, Ehrenpfordt J, Vandahl T (1997) Universal pressure and temperature SAW sensor for wireless applications. In: Ultrasonics symposium, 1997. Proceedings 1997 IEEE, vol. 1, pp 359–362

  44. Buff W, Rusko M, Vandahl T, Goroll M, Moller F (1996) A differential measurement SAW device for passive remote sensoring. In: Ultrasonics symposium, 1996. Proceedings 1996 IEEE, vol 1, pp 343–346

  45. Axinte DA, Gindy N, Fox K, Unanue I (2004) Process monitoring to assist the workpiece surface quality in machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 44(10):1091–1108

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Denkena B, Hollmann F (2013) Process machine interactions: prediction and manipulation of interactions between manufacturing processes and machine tool structures. Lecture notes in production engineering. Springer, New York

    Book  Google Scholar 

  47. Rotberg J, Lenz E, Braun S (1987) Mechanical signature analysis in interrupted cutting. CIRP Ann Manuf Technol 36(1):249–252

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rory Stoney.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stoney, R., O’Donnell, G.E. & Geraghty, D. Dynamic wireless passive strain measurement in CNC turning using surface acoustic wave sensors. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 69, 1421–1430 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5116-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-013-5116-5

Keywords

Navigation