Skip to main content
Log in

Fault diagnosis on production systems with support vector machine and decision trees algorithms

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, the operation of the didactic modular production system of the Festo Company was monitored by using eight sensors. The output of the linear potentiometer, magazine optic sensor, vacuum analog pressure sensor, material holding P/E switch, material handling arm pressure sensor, vacuum information P/E switch, optic sensor, and pressure sensor of main system were recorded while the system was operating in the perfect condition and various problems were artificially created. Some of these defects were empty magazine, zero vacuum, inappropriate material, no pressure, closed manual pressure valve, missing drilling stroke, poorly located material, not vacuuming the material and low air pressure. In all cases, one or more sensors clearly indicated the defect. The results indicated that the system support vector machine (SVM) and decision tree algorithm correctly identified all the presented cases.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Yenitepe R (2004) An Application of SCADA Systems on a MT Educational MPS Unit, IEEE International Conference on Mechatronics ICM04 June 3–5 Istanbul, Turkey 2004 487–491

  2. Khalgui M, Hanisch HM (2008) NCES-based modelling and CTL-based verification of reconfigurable Benchmark Production Systems, Industrial Embedded Systems, SIES 2008. International Symposium on June 2008, Le Grande Motte: 11–13

  3. Hu Q, He Z, Zhang Z, Zi Y (2007) Fault diagnosis of rotating machinery based on improved wavelet package transform and SVMs ensemble. Mechanical Systems and Signal Processing 21:688–705

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Ge M, Du R, Zhang G, Xu Y (2004) Fault diagnosis using support vector machine with an application in sheet metal stamping operations. Mech Syst Signal Pr 18:143–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Yang J, Zhang Y, Zhu Y (2007) Intelligent fault diagnosis of rolling element bearing based on SVMs and fractal dimension. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:2012–2024

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Tran VT, Yang BS, Oh MS, Tan ACC (2009) Fault diagnosis of induction motor based on decision trees and adaptive neuro-fuzzy inference. Expert Syst Appl 36:1840–1849

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Mobley RK (1990) An introduction to predictive maintenance. Van Nostrand Reinhold, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Sun W, Chen J, Li J (2007) Decision tree and PCA-based fault diagnosis of rotating machinery. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:1300–1317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Yuan SF, Chu FL (2006) Support vector machines-based fault diagnosis for turbo-pump rotor. Mech Syst Signal Pr 20:939–952

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Support vector machine in machine condition monitoring and fault diagnosis. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:2560–2574

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Cortes C, Vapnik V (1995) Support-vector networks. Mach Learning 20(3):273–295

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Ganyun LV, Cheng HZ, Zhai HB, Dong LX (2005) Fault diagnosis of power transformer based on multi-layer SVM classifier. EPSR 75:9–15

    Google Scholar 

  13. Yuan SF, Chu FL (2007) Fault diagnosis based on support vector machines with parameter optimisation by artificial immunisation algorithm. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:1318–1330

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Samanta B, Al-Balushi KR, Al-Araimi SA (2003) Artificial neural networks and support vector machines with genetic algorithm for bearing fault detection. Eng Appl Artif Intel 16:657–665

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Widodo A, Yang BS (2007) Application of nonlinear feature extraction and support vector machines for fault diagnosis of induction motors. Expert Syst Appl 33:241–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Widodo A, Yang BS, Han T (2007) Combination of independent component analysis and support vector machines for intelligent faults diagnosis of induction motors. Expert Syst Appl 32:299–312

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Yang Y, Yu D, Cheng J (2007) A fault diagnosis approach for roller bearing based on IMF envelope spectrum and SVM. Measurement 40:943–950

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Yang BS, Hwang WW, Ko MH, Lee SJ (2005) Cavitation detection of butterfly valve using support vector machines. J Sound Vib 287(1–2):25–43

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Yang BS, Hwang WW, Kim DJ, Tan AC (2005) Condition classification of small reciprocating compressor for refrigerators using artificial neural networks and support vector machines. Mech Syst Signal Pr 19:371–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Yuan SF, Chu FL (2007) Fault diagnostics based on particle swarm optimisation and support vector machines. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:1787–1798

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Liang J, Du R (2007) Model-based fault detection and diagnosis of HVAC systems using support vector machine method. Int J Refrig 30:1104–1114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Wu Q (2010) Fault diagnosis model based on Gaussian support vector classifier machine. Expert Syst Appl 37:6251–6256

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Wu Q (2010) Car assembly line fault diagnosis based on modified support vector classifier machine. Expert Syst Appl 37:6352–6358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Wu Q Hybrid fuzzy support vector classifier machine and modified genetic algorithm, Expert Systems with Applications

  25. for automatic car assembly fault diagnosis, DIO: 10. 1016/j.eswa.2010.07.052

  26. Wu Q, Ni Z Car assembly line fault diagnosis based on triangular fuzzy support vector classifier machine and particle swarm optimization, Expert Systems with Applications, DIO: 10.1016/j.eswa.2010.08.099

  27. Wu Q, Ni Z Car assembly line fault diagnosis based on triangular fuzzy Gaussian support vector classifier machine and modified genetic algorithm, Expert Systems with Applications, DIO:10.1016/j.eswa.2010.09.003

  28. Sugumaran V, Muralidharan V, Ramachandran KI (2007) Feature selection using decision tree and classification through proximal support vector machine for fault diagnostics of roller bearing. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:930–942

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Sugumaran V, Ramachandran KI (2007) Automatic rule learning using decision tree for fuzzy classifier in fault diagnosis of roller bearing. Mech Syst Signal Pr 21:2237–2247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Saravanan N, Ramachandran KI (2009) Fault diagnosis of spur bevel gear box using discrete wavelet features and decision tree classification. Expert Syst Appl 36:9564–9573

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Hunt EB, Marin J, Stone PJ (1966) Experiments in induction. Academic, New York

    Google Scholar 

  32. Yang BS, Lim DS, Tan ACC (2005) VIBEX: an expert system for vibration fault diagnosis of rotating machinery using decision tree and decision table. Expert Syst Appl 28:735–742

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Peng YH, Flach PA, Brazdil P, Soares C Decision tree-based data characterization for meta-learning In: ECML/PKDD-2002 Workshop IDDM-2002, Helsinki, Finland

  34. Quinlan JR (1996) Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. J Arti Research 4:77–90

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  35. Sakthivel NR, Sugumaran V, Babudevasenapati S (2010) Vibration based fault diagnosis of monoblock centrifugal pump using decision tree. Expert Syst Appl 37:4040–4049

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Xiang X, Zhou J, An X, Peng B, Yang J (2008) Fault diagnosis based on Walsh transform and support vector machine. Mech Syst Signal Pr 22:1685–1693

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Lai RK, Fan CY, Huang WH, Chang PC (2009) Evolving and clustering fuzzy decision tree for financial time series data forecasting. Expert Syst Appl 36:3761–3773

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Chang PC, Fan CY, Dzan WY (2010) A CBR-based fuzzy decision tree approach for database classification. Expert Syst Appl 37:214–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Pomorski D, Perche PB (2001) Inductive learning of decision trees: application to fault isolation of an induction motor. Eng Appl Artif Intel 14:155–166

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Patel SA, Kamrani AK (1996) Intelligent decision support system for diagnosis and maintenance of automated systems. Com Indus Engineering 30(2):297–319

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Breiman, L., Friedman, J.H., Olshen, R.A., Stone, C.J., 1984. Classification and regression trees. Technical Report. Wadsworth International Group, Belmont, CA

  42. Quinlan JR (1986) Induction of decision trees. Machine Learning J 1:81–106

    Google Scholar 

  43. Quinlan JR (1996) Improved use of continuous attributes in C4.5. J Artif Intell Res 4:77–90

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  44. Demetgul M, Tansel IN, Taskin S (2009) Fault diagnosis of pneumatic systems with artificial neural network algorithms. Expert Syst Appl 36(7):10512–10519

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Demetgul M, Yazıcıoglu O (2006) Fault classifying in a pneumatic system using backpropagation neural network algorithm. J Tech 9(2):101–109

    Google Scholar 

  46. Demetgul M, Tansel IN, Yazicioglu O, Taşkın S (2009) Signals of pneumatic systems during the perfect and detective operation, FCRAR 2009. Florida Atlantic University, Boca Raton, FL

    Google Scholar 

  47. Taskin S (2007) Computer aided real time control of MPS modular production system and technical education application, Marmara University Institute of Science & Technology, Ph.D. Thesis

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to M. Demetgul.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Demetgul, M. Fault diagnosis on production systems with support vector machine and decision trees algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 2183–2194 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4639-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4639-5

Keywords

Navigation