Skip to main content
Log in

A process-oriented approach to modeling the conceptual design of aircraft assembly lines

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The need to develop methods and software applications to support the design of assembly lines is academically and industrially acknowledged. This paper focuses on the conceptual design of aeronautical assembly lines. A model is proposed to represent the process to design an aerostructure assembly line at the conceptual design phase and the knowledge requirements to support such process. The conceptual design process is documented in an Integrated Definition for Function Modeling model and the knowledge model is documented in Unified Modeling Language. The model provides a starting point in the formalization of the assembly line conceptual design. The objective is to use such model for the development of a knowledge-based application prototype in an industrially used software system.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. La Rocca G, Krakers L, van Tooren MJL (2002) Development of an ICAD generative model for blended wing body aircraft design. In: Proceedings of the 9th AIAA/ISSMO Symposium on Multidisciplinary Analysis and Optimization, Atlanta, USA; September

  2. Choi JW, Kelly D, Raju J, Reidsema C (2005) Knowledge-based engineering system to estimate manufacturing cost for composite structures. J Aircr 42:1396–1402

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Butterfield J, Mawhinney P, Crosby S, Price M, Curran R, Armstrong CG, Raghunathan S, Aleenan DM, Keever CM (2005) An integrated approach to the conceptual development of aircraft structures focusing on manufacturing simulation and cost. In: AIAA 5th Aviation, Technology, Integration and Operations Conference, Arlington, USA

  4. Raju JA (2003) Conceptual design and cost optimisation methodology. In: 44th AIAA/ASME/AHS Structures, Structural Dynamics and Materials Conference, Norfolk, Virginia; April

  5. De Lit P, Delchambre A (2003) Integrated design of a product family and its assembly system. Kluwer, Boston

    Book  Google Scholar 

  6. Chow WM (1990) Assembly line design: methodology and applications. Dekker, New York

    Google Scholar 

  7. Wirtorsson M, Andersson T, Broman M (2000) A note on the specification of assembly systems. Int J Prod Res 38:3999–4004

    Google Scholar 

  8. Khan A, Day AI (2002) A knowledge based design methodology for manufacturing assembly lines. Comput Ind Eng 41:441–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Barnes CJ (2000) A methodology for the concurrent design of products and their assembly sequences. PhD Thesis. Cranfield University, UK

  10. Fowler JW, Rose O (2004) Grand challenges in modeling and simulation of complex manufacturing systems. Simulation 80:469–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Stokes M (2001) Managing engineering knowledge: MOKA—methodology for knowledge based engineering applications. ASME, New York

    Google Scholar 

  12. Bureau de Normalisation de l’Aéronautique et de l’Espace (BNAE). RG Aéro 000 40: General recommendation for the Programme Management Specification. April 1999

  13. Pardessus T (2004) Concurrent engineering development and practices for aircraft design at Airbus. In: Proceedings of the 24th ICAS Conf., Yokohama, Japan

  14. Rajkumar R, Williams G (1999) Capturing the assembly process planning rationale within an aerospace industry. In: Proceedings of the 1999 IEEE, International Symposium on Assembly and Task Planning, Porto, Portugal; July; 319–324

  15. Liu T-H (1992) An object-oriented assembly application methodology for PDES/STEP based mechanical systems. PhD thesis. University of Iowa, USA

  16. Zha XF, Du H (2002) A PDES/STEP-based model and system for concurrent integrated design and assembly planning. Computer-Aided Des 34:1087–1110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Rachuri S, Han Y-H, Foufou S, Feng SC, Roy U, Wang F, Sriram RD, Lyons KW (2006) A model for capturing product assembly information. J Comput Inf Sci Eng 6:11–21

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Sudarsan R, Fenves SJ, Sriram RD, Wang F (2005) A product information modeling framework for product lifecycle management. Computer-Aided Des 37:1399–1411

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Kim K-Y, Manley DG, Yang H (2006) Ontology-based assembly design and information sharing for collaborative product development. Computer-Aided Des 38:1233–1250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Wang H, Xiang D, Duan G, Zhang L (2007) Assembly planning based on semantic modeling approach. Comput Ind 58:227–239

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Hongmin Z, Dianliang W, Xiumin F (2010) Interactive assembly tool planning based on assembly semantics in virtual environment. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51:739–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Barnes CJ, Jared GEM, Swift KG (2004) Decision support for sequence generation in an assembly oriented design environment. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 20:289–300

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Su Q (2009) A hierarchical approach on assembly sequence planning and optimal sequences analyzing. Robot Comput-Integr Manuf 25:224–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dong T, Tong R, Zhang L, Dong J (2007) A knowledge-based approach to assembly sequence planning. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:1232–1244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Lanz M, Garcia F, Kallela T, Tuokko R (2008) Product-process ontology for managing assembly specific knowledge between product design and assembly system simulation. In: Ratchev S, Koelemeijer S (eds) IFIP Intl. Federation for Information Processing, vol. 260, micro-assembly technologies and applications. Springer, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  26. Wang L, Keshavarzmanesh S, Feng H-Y, Buchal RO (2009) Assembly process planning and its future in collaborative manufacturing: a review. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:132–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Ríos J, Mas F, Menéndez JL (2012) Aircraft final assembly line balancing and workload smoothing: a methodological analysis. Key Eng Mater 502:19–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Boysen N, Fliedner M, Scholl A (2007) A classification of assembly line balancing problems. Eur J Oper Res 183:674–693

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  29. Heike G, Ramulu M, Sorenson E, Shanahan P, Moinzadeh K (2001) Mixed model assembly alternatives for low-volume manufacturing: the case of aerospace industry. Int J Prod Econ 72:103–120

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Jin Y, Curran R, Butterfield J, Burke R (2008) A quantitative metric for workstation design for aircraft assembly. In: Collaborative product and service life cycle management for a sustainable world. Springer: London

  31. Mas F, Ríos J, Menéndez JL, Hernández JC, Vizán A (2008) Concurrent conceptual design of aero-structure assembly lines. In: Proceedings of the 14th Intl. Conf. on Concurrent Enterprising (ICE), Lisbon, Portugal. pp 783–790

  32. Menéndez JL, Mas F, Serván J, Ríos J (2012) Virtual verification of an aircraft final assembly line industrialization: an industrial case. Key Eng Mater 502:139–144

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Mas F, Ríos J, Menéndez JL (2012) Conceptual design of an aircraft final assembly line: a case study. Key Eng Mater 502:49–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Gómez A, Mas F, Menéndez JL, Ríos J (2012) Development to assist in the creation of product development structures. In: Proceedings of the 29th Intl. Manufacturing Conference (IMC29), Belfast, UK; August

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to F. Mas.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mas, F., Ríos, J., Menéndez, J.L. et al. A process-oriented approach to modeling the conceptual design of aircraft assembly lines. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 771–784 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4521-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4521-5

Keywords

Navigation