Skip to main content
Log in

A method for identification of geometrical tool changes during machining of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

There exists an increasing demand for cost and time-efficient cutting tests for describing the performance of different combinations of cutting tools and workpiece materials in the cutting process both in industry and academia. Cutting tools are expected to withstand the heat and the pressure developed during the machining of difficult-to-machine materials such as Ti6Al4V. This article introduces a new test method which may be used in order to analyze both the machinability of a workpiece material as well as the cutting tool behavior. The experiments were performed by using a predefined sequence of feeds, a so-called Stepwise Increased Feed Test. A gradually increased load on the cutting edge was thus applied up to the point where plastic deformation of the cutting edge was obtained. The limit for the initial change in tool geometry was identified through analysis of measured cutting forces.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Astakhov VP (2004) The assessment of cutting tool wear. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 44(6):637–647

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ezugwu EO, Da Silva RB, Bonney J, Machado AR (2005) Evaluation of the performance of CBN tools when turning Ti-6Al-4V alloy with high-pressure coolant supplies. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 45(9):1009–1014

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Komanduri R, von Turkovich BP (1981) New observations on the mechanism of chip formation when machining titanium alloys. Wear 69(2):179–188

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Machado AR, Wallbank J (1990) Machining of titanium and its alloys—a review. Proc Inst Mech Eng B J Eng Manufact 204(1):53–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Ezugwu EO, Wang ZM (1998) Titanium alloys and their machinability—a review. J Mater Process Tech 68(3):262–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Ezugwu EO, Bonney J, Yamane Y (2003) An overview of the machinability of aeroengine alloys. J Mater Process Tech 134(2):233–253

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Hong SY, Ding Y (2001) Cooling approaches and cutting temperatures in cryogenic machining of Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 41(10):1417–1437

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Vosough M, Kalhori V, Liu P (2004) Influence of high-pressure water-jet-assisted turning on surface residual stresses on Ti6Al4V alloy by measurement and finite element simulation. Proceeding of the 3rd International Surface Engineering Congress and Exposition, Orlando, pp. 107–113

  9. Dalman P (2000) High-pressure jet-assisted turning chip control and temperature reduction. Doctoral Thesis, Department of Production Engineering, Chalmers University of Technology Gothenburg, Sweden

  10. Jawaid A, Sharif S, Koksal S (2000) Evaluation of wear mechanisms of coated carbide tools when face milling titanium alloy. J Mater Process Technol 99(1–3):266–274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Meng Q, Arsecularatne JA, Mathew P (1998) Prediction of the cutting conditions giving plastic deformation of the tool in oblique machining. Int J Mach Tool Manuf 38(10–11):1165–1182

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Nachev VI, Oxley PLB (1985) Predicting cutting conditions giving plastic deformation of the cutting edge in terms of tool and work material properties. Proceedings of the 25th International MTDR Conference, Macmillan, London, pp. 225–230

  13. Trent EM (1968) Hot compressive strength of cemented carbides. Proceedings of the 8th International MTDR Conference, Manchester, pp. 629–642

  14. Kuljanic E (1992) Macro plastic deformation of cutting edge—a method for maximum utilization of cutting tool. Annals of the CIRP 41(1):151–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Ståhl J-E (1986) Skäreggars spontanhaverier. Doctoral Thesis, Division of Production and Materials Engineering, Lund University. (In Swedish)

  16. Ståhl J-E (2012) Metal cutting—theories and models. Division of Production and Materials Engineering, Lund University in cooperation with Seco Tools AB

  17. Spaans C (1967) The extra forces near cutting edge and their implications. International Conference on Manufacturing Technology, pp. 533–552

  18. Spaans C (1971) The fundamentals of three-dimensional chip curl, chip breaking and chip control. Laboratorium voor werkplaatstechniek, Delft

    Google Scholar 

  19. Johnson GR, Cook WH (1985) Fracture characteristics of three metals subjected to various strains, strain rates, temperatures and pressures. Eng Fract Mech 21(1):31–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Manouchehr Vosough.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Vosough, M., Schultheiss, F., Agmell, M. et al. A method for identification of geometrical tool changes during machining of titanium alloy Ti6Al4V. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 67, 339–348 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4487-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4487-3

Keywords

Navigation