Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

From time-based competition (TBC) to quick response manufacturing (QRM): the evolution of research aimed at lead time reduction

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a complete review of the literature regarding lead time reduction within the context of time-based competition (TBC) and quick response manufacturing (QRM) paradigms. From the review, a classification system has been proposed. From this study, gaps in the literature could be identified as follows: (1) lack of quantitative studies showing the benefits of TBC/QRM and the use of empirical studies (especially action research) about these paradigms; (2) some principles and tools of both paradigms are rarely studied, for example, principles related to utilization levels, lot size, and performance measures focused on time; and (3) the application of principles and tools of the TBC/QRM in practice are scarce. These gaps represent opportunity for future research in the area. This paper is also valuable for managers in practice once it concludes that the essential aspect of the paradigm TBC/QRM is the focus on lead time reduction and not on tools and methods. A direct consequence of this finding is that to develop and use performance measures of lead time reduction is critical within the TBC/QRM.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Atkinson W (1990) Customer-responsive manufacturing organization. Manuf Syst 8(5):58–66

    Google Scholar 

  2. Bartezzaghi E, Spina G, Verganti R (1994) Lead time models of business processes. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 14(5):5–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Birtwistle G, Firito SS, Moore CM (2006) Supplier perceptions of quick response systems. J Enterp Inf Manag 19(3):334–34

    Google Scholar 

  4. Blackburn JD (1992) Time-based competition: white-collar activities. Business Horizons 35(4):96–101

    Google Scholar 

  5. Bower JL, Hout TM (1988) Fast cycle capability for competitive power. Harvard Business Review, November–December, pp 110–118

  6. Bozarth A, Chapman S (1996) A contingency view of time-based competition for manufacturers. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(6):56–67

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Brennan RW, Foroughi B (1999) A control framework to support responsive manufacturing. Int J Agil Manag Syst 1(3):159–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Buyukozkan G, Baykasolu A (2007) Integration of Internet and web-based tools in new product development process. Production Planning and Control 18(1):44–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Buzacott JA (1995) A perspective on new paradigms in manufacturing. J Manuf Syst 14(2):118–125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Carter PL, Melnyk SA, Handfield RB (1995) Identifying the basic process strategies for time-based competition. Production and Inventory Management Journal 36:65–70

    Google Scholar 

  11. Daugherty PJ, Pittman PH (1995) Utilization of time-based strategies: cresting distribution flexibility/responsiveness. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(2):54–60

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Degraeve Z, Schrage L (1998) HOP: a software tool for production scheduling at Bridgestone/Firestone Off-The-Road. Eur J Oper Res 110(2):188–198

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  13. Dibrell C, Davis PS, Danskin P (2005) The influence of internationalization on time-based competition. Manag Int Rev 45(2):173–195

    Google Scholar 

  14. Ericksen PD, Stoflet NJE, Suri R (2007) Manufacturing critical-path time—the QRM metric for lead time. Course Notebook, Department of Industrial and Systems Engineering 641 Class (Design and Analysis of Manufacturing Systems), University of Wisconsin at Madison

  15. Ericksen PD, Suri R, El Jawhari B, Armstrong AJ (2005) Filling the gap: rethinking supply management in the age of global sourcing and Lean. APICS: The performance Advantage, Feb

  16. Ericksen PD, Suri R (2001) Managing the extended enterprise. Purchasing Today 12(2):58–63

    Google Scholar 

  17. Fernandes FCF, Maccarthy BL (1999) Production planning and control: the gap between theory and practice in the light of modern manufacturing concepts. IIE Trans 29(10):825–838

    Google Scholar 

  18. Fernandes NO, Carmo-Silva S (2006) Generic POLCA: a production and materials flow control mechanism for quick response manufacturing. Int J Prod Econ 104(1):74–84

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Fernie J, Azuma N (2003) The changing nature of Japanese fashion: can quick response improve supply chain efficiency? Eur J Mark 38(7):708–808

    Google Scholar 

  20. Filippini R (1997) Operations management research: some reflections on evolution, models and empirical studies in OM. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 17(7):655–670

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Fouchal F, Dickens P (2007) Adaptive screen printing for rapid manufacturing. Rapid Prototyping Journal 13(5):287–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Gaimon C, Burgess RH (2003) Analysis of the lead time and learning for capacity expansions. Productions and Operations Management 12(1):129–140

    Google Scholar 

  23. Gehani RR (1995) Time-based management of technology: a taxonomic integration of tactical and strategic roles. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(2):19–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gelders A, Mannaerts A, Maes A (1994) Manufacturing strategy, performance indicators and improvement programs. Int J Prod Res 32(4):797–805

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Gest G, Culley SJ, Mcintosh RI, Mileham AR (1995) Review of fast tool change systems. Comput Integr Manuf Syst 8(3):205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Gindy N (1999) Responsive manufacturing. Assembly Automotive 18(1):55–61

    Google Scholar 

  27. Godinho Filho M, Fernandes FCF (2005) Paradigmas estratégicos de gestão da manufatura (PEGEMs): elementos chave e modelo conceitual. Gestão & Produção, São Carlos 12(3):333–346

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Godinho Filho M, Uzsoy R (2009) Efeitos da redução do tamanho de lote e de programas de melhoria contínua no estoque em processo (WIP) e na utilização: estudo utilizando uma abordagem híbrida system dynamics–factory physics. São Paulo. Produção, vol 19, no. 1, Jan./Abr., pp 214–224

  29. Godinho Filho M, Uzsoy, R. (2011) The effect of shop floor continuous improvement programs on lot size–cycle time relationship for a multi- product single-machine environment. Int J of Adv Manuf Technol, 52(5-8):669–681

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Grubb L (1998) Using total cycle time for quick response manufacturing. Assembly Automotive 18(1):20–24

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  31. Harding L (2002) QRM: an enabler on the road to agility? Control 15:15–18

    Google Scholar 

  32. Hodgson A, Arman H, Gindy NNZ (2008) An intelligent technology watch function for the high technology enterprise. International Journal of Industry an Systems Engineering 3(1):38–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Holweg M (2005) The three dimensions of responsiveness. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 25(7):603–622

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Holweg M, Disney S, Holmstrom J, Smaros J (2005) Towards responsive vehicle supply: a simulation-based investigation into automotive scheduling system. J Oper Manag 23(5):507–530

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Hum SH, Sim HH (1994) Time-based competition: literature review and implications for modeling. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 16(1):75–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Hunter NA, Valentino P (1995) Quick response—ten years later. International Journal of Clothing Science and Technology 7(4):30–40

    Article  Google Scholar 

  37. Jayaram J, Vivkery SK, Droge C (1999) An empirical study of time-based competition in the Norte American automotive supplier industry. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 19(10):1010–1034

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Johnson DJ (2003) A framework for reducing manufacturing throughput time. J Manuf Syst 22(4):283–298

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Kim LA, Tang CSA (1997) Lead time and response time in a pull production control system. Eur J Oper Res 101(3):474–485

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  40. Koufteros XA, Vonderembse MA, Doll WJ (1998) Developing measures of time-based manufacturing. J Oper Manag 16(1):21–41

    Article  Google Scholar 

  41. Krishnan H, Butz DA (2010) Quick response and retailer effort. Manag Sci 56(6):962–977

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  42. Kritchanchai D, Maccarthy BL (1999) Responsiveness and strategy in manufacturing. Proceedings of the Workshop Responsiveness in Manufacturing,’ IEE, London, pp 98–123

  43. Kumar A, Montwani J (1995) A methodology for assessing time-based-competitive advantage of manufacturing firms. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 15(2):33–53

    Article  Google Scholar 

  44. Lakatos EM, Marconi MA (2001) Metodologia do trabalho científico: procedimentos básicos, pesquisa bibliográfica, projeto e relatório, publicações e trabalhos científicos. 6th, Atlas, São Paulo

  45. Liang L, Guo B (2007) The evaluation for the mission-time of quick response manufacturing system. International Joint Conference on Computational Sciences and Optimization, April 24–26, 2009, Sanya, China

  46. Liang L, Guo B (2010) The optimization method of quick response manufacturing system based on the genetic algorithm. Third International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering, August 13–15, 2010, Hong Kong, China

  47. Lim MK, Zhang Z (2003) A mult-agent based manufacturing control strategy for manufacturing. J Mater Process Technol 139:379–384

    Article  Google Scholar 

  48. Little D, Peck M, Porter K (2005) Responsive manufacturing demands alignment of production control methods to business drivers. Integr Manuf Syst 12(3):170–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  49. Meyer MH, Utterback JM (1995) Product development cycle time and commercial success. IEEE Trans Eng Manag 42(4):297–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  50. Mileham AR, Culley SJ, Mcintosh RI, Gest G, Owen GW (1997) Set-up reduction (SUR) beyond total productive maintenance (TPM). Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers, part B: Journal of Engineering Manufacturing, vol. 211, no. B4, pp 253–260

  51. Mosher T, Stucker B (2004) Responsive space requires for responsive manufacturing. 2nd Responsive Space Conference, April 19–22, 2004, Los Angeles, CA

  52. Nahm AY, Vonderembse MA, Koufteros XA (2003) The impact of organizational culture on time-based manufacturing and performance. Decis Sci 35(4):579–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  53. Pragman CH (1996) JIT II—a purchasing concept for reducing lead times in time-based competition. Business Horizons 39(4):54–58

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Ranga P, Dwivedi SN (2003) Research issues in responsive and agile manufacturing. International Conference on Agile Manufacturing, Advances in Agile Manufacturing, 2003, Beijing, China

  55. Rich N, Hines P (1997) Supply-chain management and time-based competition: the role of the supplier association. Int J Phys Distrib Logist Manag 27(3/4):210–225

    Article  Google Scholar 

  56. Riezebos J (2010) Design of POLCA material control systems. Int J Prod Res 48(5):455–477

    Article  Google Scholar 

  57. Rise RT (1995) The implication time-based competition on international logistics strategies. Business Horizons, September–October, pp 39–45

  58. Rohr SS, Corrêa HL (1998) Time-based competitiveness in Brazil: why and how. International Journal of Operations & Production Management 18(3):233–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Rondeau PJ, Vonderembse MA, Ragu-Nathan TS (2002) Investigating the level and-user development and envelopment among time-based competitor. Decis Sci 33(1):153–160

    Article  Google Scholar 

  60. Saad SM, Gindy NNZ (2007) Future shape of the responsive manufacturing enterprise. Benchmarking: An International Journal 14(1):140–152

    Article  Google Scholar 

  61. Saes EV, Godinho Filho M (2008) Lean manufacturing e quick response manufacturing: Análise Comparativa. XX SIMPEP Simpósio de Engenharia de Produção, November 10–12, 2008, Bauru, Brazil

  62. Selitto MA, Walter C (2008) Medição e controle do tempo de atravessamento em um sistema de manufatura. Gestão & Produção 15(1):135–147

    Google Scholar 

  63. Sim KL, Curatola AP (1999) Time-based competition. International Journal of Quality & Reliability Management 16(7):659–674

    Article  Google Scholar 

  64. Stalk G Jr (1988) Time—the next source of competitive advantage. Harvard Business Review, July–August, pp 41–51

  65. Stump B, Badurdeen F (2009) Integrating lean and other strategies for mass customization manufacturing: a case study. Journal of Intelligent manufacturing 23(1):109–124

    Google Scholar 

  66. Sullivan P, Kang J (1999) Quick response adoption in the apparel manufacturing industry: competitive advantage of innovation. Journal of Small Business Management 31(1):1–13

    Google Scholar 

  67. Suri R, Sahu S, Rath F (2006) Using QRM to reduce lead times in biotech manufacturing. Industrial Engineering Annual Conference and Exhibition, May, 2006, Orlando, USA

  68. Suri R, Treville S (1993) Rapid modeling: the use of queuing models to support time-based competitive manufacturing. In: Fandel G, Gulledge T, Jones A (eds) Operations research in production planning and control. Springer, New York, pp 21–30

    Google Scholar 

  69. Suri R (1998) Quick response manufacturing: a companywide approach to reducing lead times. Productivity Press, Portland

    Google Scholar 

  70. Suri R (1998) Don’t push or pull—POLCA. APICS—Production Management 8(11):32–38

    Google Scholar 

  71. Suri R (2010) It's about time: the competitive advantage of quick response manufacturing. Productive Press, Portland

    Book  Google Scholar 

  72. Suri R, Veeramani R, Church J (1995) ABB teams up with university to drive QRM. IEE Solutions, November, pp 27–30

  73. Suri R, Krishnamurthy A (2003) How to plan and implement POLCA: a material control, system for high variety or custom-engineered products. Technical Report, Center for Quick Response Manufacturing, University of Wisconsin-Madison, WI

  74. Tammela I, Canen AG, Helo P (2008) Time-based competition and multiculturalism: a comparative approach to the Brazilian, Danish and Finish furniture industries. Manag Decis 46(3):349–364

    Article  Google Scholar 

  75. Tersine RJ, Hummingbird EA (1995) Lead-time reduction: the search for competitive advantage. International Journal of Operations and Production Management 15(2):8–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  76. Timothy FA, Kirk KA, William BB (1993) Performance measurement systems and time-based manufacturing. Production Planning & Control 4(2):153–159

    Article  Google Scholar 

  77. Toni AD, Meneghetti A (2000) Traditional and innovation paths towards time-based-competition. International Journal Production Economics 66(3):255–268

    Article  Google Scholar 

  78. Tubino F, Suri R(2000) What kind of “numbers” can a company expect after implementing quick response manufacturing? Empirical data from several projects on lead time reduction. Quick Response Manufacturing 2000 Conference Proceedings, Society of Manufacturing Engineers Press, Dearborn, MI, pp 943–972

  79. Turner T, Giles D, Albores P, Mitchell R (2006) Quick response manufacturer: when Kanban is not the solution. Control 2:20–23

    Google Scholar 

  80. Udo GJ, Grantt T (1993) Making EDI pay off: the avert express experience. Prod Invent Manag J 34(4):6–12

    Google Scholar 

  81. Vickery SK, Yeomans JM, Markland RE (1995) Time-based competition in the furniture industry. Production and Inventory Management Journal (first quarter), pp 14–21

  82. Waller B (2004) Market responsive manufacture for the automotive supply chain. J Manuf Technol Manag 15(1):10–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  83. Welker GA, Vries JD (2005) Formalizing the ordering process to achieve responsiveness. J Manuf Technol Manag 16(4):396–410

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Industrial Engineering, Federal University of São Carlos, Via Washington Luiz, Km. 235, CEP 13565-905, São Carlos, São Paulo, Brazil

    Moacir Godinho Filho & Elizangela Veloso Saes

Authors
  1. Moacir Godinho Filho
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Elizangela Veloso Saes
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Moacir Godinho Filho.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Godinho Filho, M., Veloso Saes, E. From time-based competition (TBC) to quick response manufacturing (QRM): the evolution of research aimed at lead time reduction. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 64, 1177–1191 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4064-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-012-4064-9

Keywords

Search

Navigation