Abstract
In this study, performance of cryogenically treated M35 high speed steel (HSS) twist drills in drilling of AISI 304 and 316 stainless steels was evaluated in terms of thrust force, surface roughness, tool wear, tool life, and chip formation. To present the differences in tool performance between untreated and treated drills, and machinability between AISI 304 SS and AISI 316 SS, a number of experiments were performed at different combinations of cutting speed, and feed rate. As the results of the conducted experiments, the treated drills showed better performance than untreated drills in terms of thrust force, surface roughness, and tool wear and tool life for both types of stainless steels. Tool lives of treated HSS drills in drilling of AISI 304 SS and AISI 316 SS improved 32% and 14%, respectively, when compared with untreated drills. Experimental results also showed that machinability of AISI 304 SS was harder than the machinability of AISI 316 SS.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
SreeramaReddy TV, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, Venkatram R (2009) Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 27:181–185
Khan AA, Ahmed MI (2008) Improving tool life using cryogenic cooling. J Mater Process Technol 196:149–154
Gill SS, Rupinder Singh R, Singh H, Singh J (2009) Wear behaviour of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts under dry and wet turning conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:256–260
Silva FJ, Franco SD, Machado AR, Ezugwu EO, Souza AMJ (2006) Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear 261:674–685
Preciado M, Bravo PM, Alegre JM (2006) Effect of low temperature tempering prior cryogenic treatment on carburized steels. J Mater Process Technol 176:41–44
Firouzdor V, Nejati E, Khomamizadeh F (2008) Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on wear resistance and tool life of M2 HSS drill. J Mater Process Technol 206:467–472
Das D, Dutta AK, Ray KK (2010) Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: part I. Microstructure and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 527:2182–2193
Akhbarizadeh A, Shafyei A, Golozar MA (2009) Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel. Mater Des 30:3259–3264
Meng F, Tagashira K, Azuma R, Sohma H (1994) Role of eta-carbide precipitations in the wear resistance improvements of Fe–12Cr–Mo–V-14C tool steel by cryogenic treatment. ISIJ Int 34:205–210
Molinari A, Pellizzari M, Gialanella S, Straffelini G, Stiasny KH (2001) Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol 118:350–355
Bensely A, Prabhakaran A, Mohan Lal D, Nagarajan G (2006) Enhancing the wear resistance of case carburized steel (En 353) by cryogenic treatment. Cryogenics 45:747–754
Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2006) Performance evaluation of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:2051–2056
Zhirafar S, Rezaeian A, Pugha M (2007) Effect of cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of 4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 186:298–303
Darwin JD, Lal DM, Nagarajan D (2008) Optimization of cryogenic treatment to maximize the wear resistance of 18% Cr martensitic stainless steel by Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 195:241–247
Das D, Dutta AK, Ray KK (2009) Optimization of the duration of cryogenic processing to maximize wear resistance of AISI D2 steel. Cryogenics 49:176–184
Huang JY, Zhu TY, Liao XZ, Beyerlein IJ, Bourke MA, Mitchell TE (2003) Microstructure of cryogenic treated M2 tool steel. Mater Sci Eng A 339:241–244
Vimal AJ, Bensely A, Lal DM, Srinivasan K (2008) Deep cryogenic treatment improves wear resistance of en 31 steel. Mater Manuf Process 23:369–376
Mohan Lal D, Renganarayanan S, Kalanidhi A (2001) Cryogenic treatment to augment wear resistance of tool and die steels. Cryogenics 41:149–155
NORDTEST NT MECH 038 (1997) Cutting fluids for drilling: evaluation by drill life test. Nordtest Method, Proj. 1242-95/2, ISSN 0283–7196
Özel T, Karpat Y, Figueira L, Davim JP (2007) Modeling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts. J Mater Process Technol 189:192–198
Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172:299–304
Xavior MA, Adithan M (2009) Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 209:900–909
Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M (2007) Cutting temperature, tool wear, surface roughness and dimensional deviation in turning AISI-4037 steel under cryogenic condition. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:754–759
Bakkal M, Shih AJ, McSpadden SB, Liu CT, Scattergood RO (2005) Light emission, chip morphology, and burr formation in drilling the bulk metallic glass. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:741–752
Dhar NR, Rashid MH, Siddiqui AT (2006) Effect of high pressure coolant on chip, roundness deviation and tool wear in drilling AISI-4340 steel. ARPN J Eng App Sci 1(3)
Lin TR, Shyu RF (2000) Improvement of tool life and exit burr using variable feeds when drilling stainless steel with coated drills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:308–313
Feng K, Jun N, Stephenson DA (2005) Continuous chip formation in drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1652–1658
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Çiçek, A., Kıvak, T., Uygur, I. et al. Performance of cryogenically treated M35 HSS drills in drilling of austenitic stainless steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60, 65–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3616-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3616-8