Skip to main content
Log in

Performance of cryogenically treated M35 HSS drills in drilling of austenitic stainless steels

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this study, performance of cryogenically treated M35 high speed steel (HSS) twist drills in drilling of AISI 304 and 316 stainless steels was evaluated in terms of thrust force, surface roughness, tool wear, tool life, and chip formation. To present the differences in tool performance between untreated and treated drills, and machinability between AISI 304 SS and AISI 316 SS, a number of experiments were performed at different combinations of cutting speed, and feed rate. As the results of the conducted experiments, the treated drills showed better performance than untreated drills in terms of thrust force, surface roughness, and tool wear and tool life for both types of stainless steels. Tool lives of treated HSS drills in drilling of AISI 304 SS and AISI 316 SS improved 32% and 14%, respectively, when compared with untreated drills. Experimental results also showed that machinability of AISI 304 SS was harder than the machinability of AISI 316 SS.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. SreeramaReddy TV, Sornakumar T, VenkataramaReddy M, Venkatram R (2009) Machinability of C45 steel with deep cryogenic treated tungsten carbide cutting tool inserts. Int J Refract Metal Hard Mater 27:181–185

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Khan AA, Ahmed MI (2008) Improving tool life using cryogenic cooling. J Mater Process Technol 196:149–154

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gill SS, Rupinder Singh R, Singh H, Singh J (2009) Wear behaviour of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide inserts under dry and wet turning conditions. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 49:256–260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Silva FJ, Franco SD, Machado AR, Ezugwu EO, Souza AMJ (2006) Performance of cryogenically treated HSS tools. Wear 261:674–685

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Preciado M, Bravo PM, Alegre JM (2006) Effect of low temperature tempering prior cryogenic treatment on carburized steels. J Mater Process Technol 176:41–44

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Firouzdor V, Nejati E, Khomamizadeh F (2008) Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on wear resistance and tool life of M2 HSS drill. J Mater Process Technol 206:467–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Das D, Dutta AK, Ray KK (2010) Sub-zero treatments of AISI D2 steel: part I. Microstructure and hardness. Mater Sci Eng A 527:2182–2193

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Akhbarizadeh A, Shafyei A, Golozar MA (2009) Effects of cryogenic treatment on wear behavior of D6 tool steel. Mater Des 30:3259–3264

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Meng F, Tagashira K, Azuma R, Sohma H (1994) Role of eta-carbide precipitations in the wear resistance improvements of Fe–12Cr–Mo–V-14C tool steel by cryogenic treatment. ISIJ Int 34:205–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Molinari A, Pellizzari M, Gialanella S, Straffelini G, Stiasny KH (2001) Effect of deep cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of tool steels. J Mater Process Technol 118:350–355

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Bensely A, Prabhakaran A, Mohan Lal D, Nagarajan G (2006) Enhancing the wear resistance of case carburized steel (En 353) by cryogenic treatment. Cryogenics 45:747–754

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Yong AYL, Seah KHW, Rahman M (2006) Performance evaluation of cryogenically treated tungsten carbide tools in turning. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 46:2051–2056

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Zhirafar S, Rezaeian A, Pugha M (2007) Effect of cryogenic treatment on the mechanical properties of 4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 186:298–303

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Darwin JD, Lal DM, Nagarajan D (2008) Optimization of cryogenic treatment to maximize the wear resistance of 18% Cr martensitic stainless steel by Taguchi method. J Mater Process Technol 195:241–247

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Das D, Dutta AK, Ray KK (2009) Optimization of the duration of cryogenic processing to maximize wear resistance of AISI D2 steel. Cryogenics 49:176–184

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Huang JY, Zhu TY, Liao XZ, Beyerlein IJ, Bourke MA, Mitchell TE (2003) Microstructure of cryogenic treated M2 tool steel. Mater Sci Eng A 339:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Vimal AJ, Bensely A, Lal DM, Srinivasan K (2008) Deep cryogenic treatment improves wear resistance of en 31 steel. Mater Manuf Process 23:369–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Mohan Lal D, Renganarayanan S, Kalanidhi A (2001) Cryogenic treatment to augment wear resistance of tool and die steels. Cryogenics 41:149–155

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. NORDTEST NT MECH 038 (1997) Cutting fluids for drilling: evaluation by drill life test. Nordtest Method, Proj. 1242-95/2, ISSN 0283–7196

  20. www.matweb.com

  21. Özel T, Karpat Y, Figueira L, Davim JP (2007) Modeling of surface finish and tool flank wear in turning of AISI D2 steel with ceramic wiper inserts. J Mater Process Technol 189:192–198

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M, Ahmed M (2006) Effect of minimum quantity lubrication (MQL) on tool wear and surface roughness in turning AISI-4340 steel. J Mater Process Technol 172:299–304

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Xavior MA, Adithan M (2009) Determining the influence of cutting fluids on tool wear and surface roughness during turning of AISI 304 austenitic stainless steel. J Mater Process Technol 209:900–909

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Dhar NR, Kamruzzaman M (2007) Cutting temperature, tool wear, surface roughness and dimensional deviation in turning AISI-4037 steel under cryogenic condition. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47:754–759

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Bakkal M, Shih AJ, McSpadden SB, Liu CT, Scattergood RO (2005) Light emission, chip morphology, and burr formation in drilling the bulk metallic glass. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:741–752

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Dhar NR, Rashid MH, Siddiqui AT (2006) Effect of high pressure coolant on chip, roundness deviation and tool wear in drilling AISI-4340 steel. ARPN J Eng App Sci 1(3)

  27. Lin TR, Shyu RF (2000) Improvement of tool life and exit burr using variable feeds when drilling stainless steel with coated drills. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16:308–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Feng K, Jun N, Stephenson DA (2005) Continuous chip formation in drilling. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 45:1652–1658

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Turgay Kıvak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Çiçek, A., Kıvak, T., Uygur, I. et al. Performance of cryogenically treated M35 HSS drills in drilling of austenitic stainless steels. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 60, 65–73 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3616-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3616-8

Keywords

Navigation