Skip to main content
Log in

Optimal control of inventory accumulation in selective assembly processes

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

    We’re sorry, something doesn't seem to be working properly.

    Please try refreshing the page. If that doesn't work, please contact support so we can address the problem.

Abstract

Assembly is a type of production process in which a number of components are combined to yield a final product. Although the concept of interchangeable parts has long been known as the fundamental principle of assembly processes, randomly picking some bulked components with dimensions varying in predefined tolerances may not be a valid approach to obtain special final products with considerably tighter tolerances. Therefore, each of the components needs to be measured and classified into dimensional groups in advance so that quality products can be obtained by matching components from suitable groups. This assembly scheme is called as “selective assembly.” In this work, we consider an assembly case with a pair of components in which one is manufactured on a given number of parallel processes whose settings can be changed to affect the dimensional distribution of the yield while the other component with a slightly bigger tolerance is manufactured on a single process with constant settings. In order to minimize the number of components which could not have been matched with their counterparts, we develop a nonlinear mathematical model to determine the optimal machine settings corresponding to the nominal mean of the component dimension which follows a normal distribution when it is machined. The solution of the mathematical model not only provides the individual settings for the parallel processes producing the same type of component but also the optimal batch sizes at each trial. We have finally used a simulation model of the whole production system, in order to prove that the solution of the mathematical model is able to provide the machine settings which minimize the number of unmatched parts at each trial.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Mansoor EM (1961) Selective assembly—its analysis and applications. Int J Prod Res 1(1):13–24

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Desmond DJ, Setty CA (1962) Simplification of selective assembly. Int J Prod Res 1(3):3–18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Pugh GA (1986) Partitioning for selective assembly. Comput Ind Eng 11(1):175–179

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Pugh GA (1992) Selective assembly with components of dissimilar variance. Comput Ind Eng 23(4):487–492

    Article  MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  5. Fang XD, Zhang Y (1995) A new algorithm for minimising the surplus parts in selective assembly. Comput Ind Eng 28(2):341–351

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Chan KC, Linn RJ (1998) A grouping method for selective assembly of dissimilar distributions. Qual Eng 11(2):221–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kannan SM, Jayabalan V (2001) A new grouping method for minimizing the surplus parts in selective assembly. Qual Eng 14(1):67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Kannan SM, Jayabalan V (2001) A new grouping method to minimize surplus parts in selective assembly for complex assemblies. Int J Prod Res 39(9):1851–1863

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Kannan SM, Asha A, Jayabalan V (2005) A new method in selective assembly to minimize clearance variation for a radial assembly using genetic algorithm. Qual Eng 17:595–607

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kumar MS, Kannan SM (2007) Optimum manufacturing tolerance to selective assembly technique for different assembly specifications by using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 32:591–598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Kannan SM, Jeevanantham K, Jayabalan V (2008) Modelling and analysis of selective assembly using Taguchi’s loss function. Int J Prod Res 46(15):4309–4330

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Asha A, Kannan SM, Jayabalan V (2008) Optimization of clearance variation in selective assembly for components with multiple characteristics. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:1026–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kannan SM, Sivasubramanian R, Jayabalan V (2009) Particle swarm optimization for minimizing assembly variation in selective assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:793–803

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Sharma S (2007) A fresh approach to performance evaluation in a multi-item production scenario. Eur J Oper Res 178:627–630

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  15. Sharma S (2008) Theory of exchange. Eur J Oper Res 186:128–136

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Mehmet Akansel.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

(DOCX 14.9 KB).

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Akansel, M., Emel, E. & Hacıoğlu, V. Optimal control of inventory accumulation in selective assembly processes. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 56, 729–742 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3191-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-011-3191-z

Keywords

Navigation