Skip to main content
Log in

An integrated framework of statistical process control and design of experiments for optimizing wire electrochemical turning process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Design of experiments (DOE) and statistical process control (SPC) have been separately used in many traditional and non-traditional machining processes, but recently these two approaches are being combined and reevaluated for more effective use and accurate conclusions. DOE and SPC are very efficient tools to maintain the process on target and within boundaries of natural variations and to achieve the maximum accuracy and effectiveness of an experimental program. This paper proposes an integrated framework of SPC and DOE to execute the experimental procedures and to investigate a reliable mathematical model for optimizing the wire electrochemical turning process (WECT). WECT is a non-traditional machining process which has tremendous applications in modern industries especially in the aerospace and military industries. Response surface methodology is used to determine the sufficient number of experiments and also the recommended values of the input parameters. Univariate and multivariate control charts are used to assess the statistical control of the output parameters. Multi-objective optimization is conducted for determining the optimum values of the input parameters.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Weller EJ, Matthew H (1984) Non-traditional machining processes. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn

    Google Scholar 

  2. Zhu D, Wang K, Qu NS (2007) Micro wire electrochemical cutting by using in situ fabricated wire electrode. Annals of the CIRP 56:241–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Hewidy M S (1982) Electrochemical wire cutting. Dissertation, University of Munofya, Egypt.

  4. Bejar MA, Eterovich F (1995) Wire-electrochemical cutting with a NaNO3 electrolyte. J Mater Process Technol 55:417–420

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Maeda R, Chikamori K, Yamamoto H (1984) Feed rate of wire electrochemical machining using pulsed current. Precis Eng 6:193–199

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Hofstede A, Van Den Brekel J W (1970) Some remarks on electrochemical turning. Annals of the CIRP XVIII: 93-106

  7. Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Van Nostrand, New York

    Google Scholar 

  8. Alexander SM (1987) The application of expert systems to manufacturing process control. Comput Ind Eng 12:307–314

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. MINITAB software version 14, Minitab Inc., www.minitab.com.

  10. Statgraphics Centurion XV software, Statpoint Technologies Inc., www.statgraphics.com.

  11. Design Expert software version 7, State-Ease Inc., www.statease.com.

  12. Kazmer David O, Sarah W (2009) A model-based methodology for on-line quality control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:280–292

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Hidetoshi M, Takashi M (2010) A nonparametric control chart based on the mood statistic for dispersion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:757–763

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Nandini D (2009) A comparison study of three non-parametric control charts to detect shift in location parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:799–807

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Abbas S, Marzieh M, Amirhossein A (2009) A CUSUM-based method for monitoring simple linear profiles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:1252–1260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Zhang Wu, Penghui W, Qinan W (2009) A loss function-based adaptive control chart for monitoring the process mean and variance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:948–959

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving average. Technometrics 1:239–250

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994) Time series analysis, forecasting and control, 3rd edn. Holden-Day, San Francisco

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  19. Hunter JS (1986) The exponentially weighted moving average. J Qual Technol 18:203–210

    Google Scholar 

  20. Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edn. Wiley, New York

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  21. Elsayed BA (2000) Perspectives and challenges for research in quality and reliability engineering. Int J Prod Res 38:1953–1976

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  22. Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (1992) A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 34:46–53

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  23. Prabhu SS, Runger GC (1997) Designing a multivariate EWMA control chart. J Qual Technol 29:8–15

    Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  25. Antony J (2003) Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. Jordan Hill, Oxford

    Google Scholar 

  26. Karnik SR, Gaitonde VN, Davim JP (2008) A comparative study of the ANN and RSM modeling approaches for predicting burr size in drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:868–883

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Aminollah M, Fadaei TA, Ehsan E, Davoud K (2008) A new approach to surface roughness and roundness improvement in wire electrical discharge turning based on statistical analyses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:64–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Narayanasamy R, Padmanabhan P (2009) Application of response surface methodology for predicting bend force during air bending process in interstitial free steel sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:38–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Aravindan S, Naveen SA, Noorul HA (2008) A machinability study of GFRP pipes using statistical techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:1069–1081

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Munda J, Bhattacharyya B (2008) Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:821–832

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Neto JC, Malaquias E, Bacci M (2006) Intervening variables in electrochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol 179:92–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  32. El-Taweel TA, Ebeid SJ (2009) Effect of hybrid electrochemical smoothing-roller burnishing process parameters on roundness error and micro-hardness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:643–655

    Article  Google Scholar 

  33. Hocheng H, Pa PS (2002) The application of a turning tool as the electrode in electropolishing. J Mater Process Technol 120:6–12

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Dowdy S, Wearden S (1983) Statistics for research. Wiley, New York

    Google Scholar 

  35. Utts Jessica M (2005) Seeing through statistics, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole, California

    Google Scholar 

  36. Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219

    Google Scholar 

  37. Castillo ED, Montgomery DC, McCarville DR (1996) Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. J Qual Technol 28:337–345

    Google Scholar 

  38. El-Taweel TA (2009) Multi-response optimization of EDM with Al–Cu–Si–TiC P/M composite electrode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:100–113

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Salah Haridy.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Haridy, S., Gouda, S.A. & Wu, Z. An integrated framework of statistical process control and design of experiments for optimizing wire electrochemical turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53, 191–207 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2828-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2828-7

Keywords

Navigation