Abstract
Design of experiments (DOE) and statistical process control (SPC) have been separately used in many traditional and non-traditional machining processes, but recently these two approaches are being combined and reevaluated for more effective use and accurate conclusions. DOE and SPC are very efficient tools to maintain the process on target and within boundaries of natural variations and to achieve the maximum accuracy and effectiveness of an experimental program. This paper proposes an integrated framework of SPC and DOE to execute the experimental procedures and to investigate a reliable mathematical model for optimizing the wire electrochemical turning process (WECT). WECT is a non-traditional machining process which has tremendous applications in modern industries especially in the aerospace and military industries. Response surface methodology is used to determine the sufficient number of experiments and also the recommended values of the input parameters. Univariate and multivariate control charts are used to assess the statistical control of the output parameters. Multi-objective optimization is conducted for determining the optimum values of the input parameters.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Weller EJ, Matthew H (1984) Non-traditional machining processes. Society of Manufacturing Engineers, Dearborn
Zhu D, Wang K, Qu NS (2007) Micro wire electrochemical cutting by using in situ fabricated wire electrode. Annals of the CIRP 56:241–244
Hewidy M S (1982) Electrochemical wire cutting. Dissertation, University of Munofya, Egypt.
Bejar MA, Eterovich F (1995) Wire-electrochemical cutting with a NaNO3 electrolyte. J Mater Process Technol 55:417–420
Maeda R, Chikamori K, Yamamoto H (1984) Feed rate of wire electrochemical machining using pulsed current. Precis Eng 6:193–199
Hofstede A, Van Den Brekel J W (1970) Some remarks on electrochemical turning. Annals of the CIRP XVIII: 93-106
Shewhart WA (1931) Economic control of quality of manufactured product. Van Nostrand, New York
Alexander SM (1987) The application of expert systems to manufacturing process control. Comput Ind Eng 12:307–314
MINITAB software version 14, Minitab Inc., www.minitab.com.
Statgraphics Centurion XV software, Statpoint Technologies Inc., www.statgraphics.com.
Design Expert software version 7, State-Ease Inc., www.statease.com.
Kazmer David O, Sarah W (2009) A model-based methodology for on-line quality control. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:280–292
Hidetoshi M, Takashi M (2010) A nonparametric control chart based on the mood statistic for dispersion. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 49:757–763
Nandini D (2009) A comparison study of three non-parametric control charts to detect shift in location parameters. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 41:799–807
Abbas S, Marzieh M, Amirhossein A (2009) A CUSUM-based method for monitoring simple linear profiles. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:1252–1260
Zhang Wu, Penghui W, Qinan W (2009) A loss function-based adaptive control chart for monitoring the process mean and variance. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 40:948–959
Roberts SW (1959) Control chart tests based on geometric moving average. Technometrics 1:239–250
Box GE, Jenkins GM, Reinsel GC (1994) Time series analysis, forecasting and control, 3rd edn. Holden-Day, San Francisco
Hunter JS (1986) The exponentially weighted moving average. J Qual Technol 18:203–210
Montgomery DC (2005) Introduction to statistical quality control, 5th edn. Wiley, New York
Elsayed BA (2000) Perspectives and challenges for research in quality and reliability engineering. Int J Prod Res 38:1953–1976
Lowry CA, Woodall WH, Champ CW, Rigdon SE (1992) A multivariate exponentially weighted moving average control chart. Technometrics 34:46–53
Prabhu SS, Runger GC (1997) Designing a multivariate EWMA control chart. J Qual Technol 29:8–15
Montgomery DC (2001) Design and analysis of experiments. Wiley, New York
Antony J (2003) Design of experiments for engineers and scientists. Jordan Hill, Oxford
Karnik SR, Gaitonde VN, Davim JP (2008) A comparative study of the ANN and RSM modeling approaches for predicting burr size in drilling. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 38:868–883
Aminollah M, Fadaei TA, Ehsan E, Davoud K (2008) A new approach to surface roughness and roundness improvement in wire electrical discharge turning based on statistical analyses. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 39:64–73
Narayanasamy R, Padmanabhan P (2009) Application of response surface methodology for predicting bend force during air bending process in interstitial free steel sheet. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:38–48
Aravindan S, Naveen SA, Noorul HA (2008) A machinability study of GFRP pipes using statistical techniques. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 37:1069–1081
Munda J, Bhattacharyya B (2008) Investigation into electrochemical micromachining (EMM) through response surface methodology based approach. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 35:821–832
Neto JC, Malaquias E, Bacci M (2006) Intervening variables in electrochemical machining. J Mater Process Technol 179:92–96
El-Taweel TA, Ebeid SJ (2009) Effect of hybrid electrochemical smoothing-roller burnishing process parameters on roundness error and micro-hardness. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 42:643–655
Hocheng H, Pa PS (2002) The application of a turning tool as the electrode in electropolishing. J Mater Process Technol 120:6–12
Dowdy S, Wearden S (1983) Statistics for research. Wiley, New York
Utts Jessica M (2005) Seeing through statistics, 3rd edn. Brooks/Cole, California
Derringer G, Suich R (1980) Simultaneous optimization of several response variables. J Qual Technol 12:214–219
Castillo ED, Montgomery DC, McCarville DR (1996) Modified desirability functions for multiple response optimization. J Qual Technol 28:337–345
El-Taweel TA (2009) Multi-response optimization of EDM with Al–Cu–Si–TiC P/M composite electrode. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 44:100–113
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Haridy, S., Gouda, S.A. & Wu, Z. An integrated framework of statistical process control and design of experiments for optimizing wire electrochemical turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 53, 191–207 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2828-7
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2828-7