Skip to main content
Log in

The dependence of tool overhang on surface quality and tool wear in the turning process

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In the turning process, the importance of machining parameter choice is increased, as it controls the surface quality required. Tool overhang is a cutting tool parameter that has not been investigated in as much detail as some of the better known ones. It is appropriate to keep the tool overhang as short as possible; however, a longer tool overhang may be required depending on the geometry of the workpiece and when using the hole-turning process in particular. In this study, we investigate the effects of changes in the tool overhang in the external turning process on both the surface quality of the workpiece and tool wear. For this purpose, we used workpieces of AISI 1050 material with diameters of 20, 30, and 40 mm; and the surface roughness of the workpiece and tool wear were determined through experiments using constant cutting speed and feed rates with different depth of cuts (DOCs) and tool overhangs. We observed that the effect of the DOC on the surface roughness is negligible, but tool overhang is more important. The deflection of the cutting tool increases with tool overhang. Two different analytical methods were compared to determine the dependence of tool deflection on the tool overhang. Also, the real tool deflection values were determined using a comparator. We observed that the tool deflection values were quite compatible with the tool deflection results obtained using the second analytical method.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Kassab SY, Khoshnaw YK (2007) The effect of cutting tool vibration on surface roughness of workpiece in dry turning operation. Eng Tech 25(7):879–889

    Google Scholar 

  2. Clancy BE, Shin YC (2002) A comprehensive chatter prediction model for face turning operation including tool wear effect. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(9):1035–1044

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Haddadi E, Shabghard MR, Ettefagh MM (2008) Effect of different tool edge conditions on wear detection by vibration spectrum analysis in turning operation. J Appl Sci 8(21):3879–3886

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tasdemir S, Neşeli S, Saritas I, Yaldız S (2008) Prediction on surface roughness using artificial neural network in lathe. Int Conf Comput Syst Tech-CompSysTech’08:IIIB.6-1-IIIB.6-8

  5. Lu C (2008) Study on prediction of surface quality in machining process. J Mater Process Technol 205:439–450

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Nurul Amin AKM, Nashron FR, Zubaire WWD (2006) Role of the frequency of secondary serrated teeth in chatter formation during turning of carbon steel AISI 1040 and stainless steel. Proc 1st Int Conf & 7th AUN/SEED-Net, Fieldwise Semin Manuf Mater Process: 181–186

  7. Audy J (2006) An appraisal of techniques and equipment for cutting force measurement. J Zhejiang Univ Sci A7(11):1781–1789

    Google Scholar 

  8. Abouelatta OB, Madl J (2001) Surface roughness prediction based on cutting parameters and tool vibrations in turning operations. J Mater Process Technol 118:269–277

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chiou RY, Liang SY (1998) Chatter stability of a slender cutting tool in turning with tool wear effect. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 38(4):315–327

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Kotaiah KR, Srinivas J, Sekar M (2009) Prediction of optimal stability states in inward-turning operation using neurogenetic algorithms. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45:679–689

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. http://www2.coromant.sandvik.com/coromant/pdf/Metalworking_Products_061/tech_a_4.pdf

  12. Beer FP, Johnston ER, DeWolf JT, Mazurek DF (2008) Mechanics of materials-5th ed. McGraw-Hill, New York

    Google Scholar 

  13. http://www2.coromant.sandvik.com/coromant/pdf/Hard_part_turning/C-1040-069.pdf

  14. Pal SK, Chakraborty D (2005) Surface roughness prediction in turning using artificial neural network. Neural Comput Appl 14:319–324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Feng CX (2001) An experimental study of the impact of turning parameters on surface roughness. Proc Ind Eng Res Conf, Dallas, TX, USA, Paper no:2036

  16. Grzesik W (2008) Influence of tool wear on surface roughness in hard turning using differently shaped ceramic tools. Wear 265:327–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Murat Kiyak.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Kiyak, M., Kaner, B., Sahin, I. et al. The dependence of tool overhang on surface quality and tool wear in the turning process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 51, 431–438 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2654-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-010-2654-y

Keywords

Navigation