Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Sink-mark minimization in injection molding through response surface regression modeling and genetic algorithm

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper deals with minimization of sink depths in injection-molded thermoplastic components by integrating finite element (FE) flow analysis with central composite design (CCD) of experiments and genetic algorithm (GA). Sink-mark depth depends on various process and design variables. Out of all, four most influential variables viz. melt temperature, mold temperature, pack pressure, and rib-to-wall ratio were used for optimization. A set of FE analyses were conducted at various combinations of variables based on the CCD array. A second-order-response surface regression model (RSRM) was developed based on the CCD. The second-order model was effectively coupled with GA for optimization of variables to minimize the sink depth. Results are encouraging and the proposed methodology could be used effectively in minimizing sink-mark depths.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Beall G (1999) Sink and voids, injection molding magazine, IMM, June 1999

  2. Mathivanan D, Parthasarathy NS (2008) Sink mark prediction and optimization—a review. SPE-ANTEC 2008:2126–2132

    Google Scholar 

  3. Shi F, Lou ZL, Lu JG, Zhang YQ (2003) Optimisation of plastics injection moulding process with soft computing. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 21:656–661. doi:10.1007/s00170-002-1374-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Tursi D, Bistany SP (2000) Process and tooling factors affecting sink marks for amorphous and crystalline resins. J Inj Molding Technol 4(3):114–119

    Google Scholar 

  5. Kazmer D, Rowland J, Sherbelis G (1997) The foundation of intelligent process control for injection molding. J Inj Molding Technol 1(1):44–56

    Google Scholar 

  6. Erzurumlu T, Ozcelik B (2006) Minimization of warpage and sink index in injection-molded thermoplastics parts using Taguchi optimization method. Mater Des 27:853–861

    Google Scholar 

  7. Oktem H, Erzurumlu T, Uzman I (2007) Application of Taguchi optimization technique in determining plastic injection molding process parameters for a thin-shell part. Mater Des 28:1271–1278

    Google Scholar 

  8. Hua Y, Phillip ML (1999) Minimizing part sink marks using C-mold and genetic-optimization algorithm. SPE-ANTEC 1999

  9. Shen C, Wang L, Cao W, Qian L (2007) Investigation of the effect of molding variables on sink marks of plastics injection molded parts using taguchi DOE technique. Polymer Plast Tech Eng 46:219–225. doi:10.1080/03602550601152887

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Hayden KF (2005) Development of a statistical model for process control to eliminate sink marks in injection molded products M.S.E Thesis, WMU

  11. Liang J-M, Wang P-J (2002) Multi-objective optimization scheme for quality control in injection molding. J Inj Molding Technol 6(4):331–342

    MathSciNet  Google Scholar 

  12. Shen C, Wang L, Cao W, Wu J (2007) Optimization for injection molding process conditions of the refrigeratory top cover using combination method of artificial neural network and genetic algorithms. Polymer Plast Tech Eng 46(2):105–112. doi:10.1080/03602550601152853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Chang RY, Tsaur BD (1995) Experimental and theoretical studies of shrinkage, warpage, and sink marks of crystalline polymer injection molded parts. Poly Eng Sci 35(15):1222–1230. doi:10.1002/pen.760351505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Shi L, Gupta M (1998) A localized shrinkage analysis for predicting sink marks in injection-molded plastics parts. J Inj Molding Technol 2(4):149–155

    Google Scholar 

  15. Shi L, Gupta M (1999) An approximate prediction of sink mark depth in rib-reinforced plastics parts by empirical equations. J Inj Molding Technol 3(1):1–10

    Google Scholar 

  16. Iyer N, Ramani K (2002) A study of localized shrinkage in injection molding with high thermal conductivity molds. J Inj Molding Technol 6(2):73–90

    Google Scholar 

  17. Wang L, Qian L, Shen C, Lu S (2008) Effects of process parameters and two-way interactions on sink mark depth of injection molded parts by using the design of experiment method. Polymer Plast Tech Eng 47(1):30–35. doi:10.1080/03602550701575987

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Patel SA, Mallick PK (1998) Development of a methodology for defect reduction in injection molding using process simulations. J Inj Molding Technol 2(4):176–191

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lin T, Chananda B (2003) Quality improvement of an injection-molded product using design of experiments: a case study. Qual Eng 16(1):99–104. doi:10.1081/QEN-120020776

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Mathivanan D, Parthasarathy NS (2008) Prediction of sink depths using nonlinear modeling of injection molding variables. Int J Adv Manuf Technol. doi:10.1007/s00170-008-1749-1

  21. MPI user guide Version 6, Moldflow. Notes on sink mark index

  22. Rees H (1995) Mold engineering. Hanser/Gardner, Cincinnati

    Google Scholar 

  23. Haftka RT, Scott EP, Cruz JR (1998) Optimization and experiments: a survey. Appl Mech Rev 51(7):435–448

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Montgomery DC (2005) Design and analysis of experiments, 5th edn. Wiley, Singapore

    MATH  Google Scholar 

  25. Goldberg DE (1999) Genetic algorithms. Addison-Wesley, Boston

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to D. Mathivanan.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Mathivanan, D., Parthasarathy, N.S. Sink-mark minimization in injection molding through response surface regression modeling and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45, 867–874 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2021-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2021-z

Keywords

Navigation