Skip to main content
Log in

Optimization of the rough cutting factors of impeller with five-axis machine using response surface methodology

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Turbo-machinery gradually has expanded its business into the automotive and aircraft industries. A core part of turbo-machinery is the impeller which can lead to manufacturing problems because it has twisted surfaces. Therefore, impeller machining requires five-axis machining technology and expert knowledge. Five-axis machining has the advantages of being able to select a variety of tool axis in the machining and remove uncut region which are impossible in the three-axis machining, which could obtain high productivity and good surface quality. Rough cutting is one very important operation as it affects productivity in the impeller machining and it is necessary to determine cutting strategies and select optimal cutting condition. This paper proposes a statistical method to optimize the rough cutting parameters in impeller machining by response surface methodology and efficient strategy to divide cutting region. Firstly, the rough operation was divided into three steps to remove volume from inducer to exducer and two steps were also added to remove the fillets between blade surfaces and hub surfaces. These machining strategies are selected as the qualitative factors when the response surface method is used. Secondly, cutting time was set as the response factor for productivity, and step-down, step over, and feed rate were determined as independent factors. Finally, the response surface model was estimated by a single surface in order to predict rough cutting time and the optimum cutting conditions were searched by the estimated model.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Young HT, Chuang LC, Gerschwiler K, Kamps S (2004) A five-axis rough machining approach for a centrifugal impeller. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23:233–239. doi:10.1007/s00170-003-1677-z

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Senatore J, Monies F, Redonnet JM, Rubio W (2007) Improved positioning for side milling of ruled surfaces: analysis of the rotation axis's influence on machining error. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 47(6):934–945. doi:10.1016/j.ijmachtools.2006.07.008

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Lee CM, Kim SW, Lee YH, Lee DW (2004) The optimal cutting orientation in ball end milling of cantilever-shaped thin plate. J Mater Process Technol 153–154:900–906. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2004.04.106

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Lauwers B, Dejonghe P, Kruth JP (2003) Optimal and collision free tool posture in five-axis machining through the tight integration of tool path generation and machine simulation. Comput Aid Des 35(5):421–432. doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(02)00045-3

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Senatore J, Monies F, Redonnet JM, Rubio W (2005) Analysis of improved positioning in five-axis ruled surface milling using envelope surface. Comput Aid Des 37(10):989–998

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Jensen CG, Red WE, Pi J (2002) Tool selection for five-axis curvature matched machining. Comput Aid Des 34:251–266. doi:10.1016/S0010-4485(01)00086-0

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Chen SL, Wang WT (2001) Computer-aided manufacturing technologies for centrifugal compressor impellers. J Mater Process Technol 115:284–293. doi:10.1016/S0924-0136(01)00828-7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Manna A, Salodkar S (2008) Optimization of machining conditions for effective turning of E0300 alloy steel. J Mater Process Technol 203(1–3):147–153. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2007.09.052

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Suresh PVS, Venkateswara Rao P, Deshmukh SG (2002) A genetic algorithmic approach for optimization of surface roughness prediction model. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 42(6):675–680. doi:10.1016/S0890-6955(02)00005-6

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Zhang JZ, Chen JC, Kirby ED (2007) Surface roughness optimization in an end-milling operation using the Taguchi design method. J Mater Process Technol 184(1–3):233–239. doi:10.1016/j.jmatprotec.2006.11.029

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Pyo Lim.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Lim, P. Optimization of the rough cutting factors of impeller with five-axis machine using response surface methodology. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 45, 821–829 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2011-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-009-2011-1

Keywords

Navigation