Abstract
In this study a series of procedures were implemented to compare acquired surfaces with the nominal data or to directly compare different scanned surfaces. In particular a morphological evaluation algorithm based on the extended Gaussian curvature (EGC) and a method to compare features based on aggregate normal orientation are presented. To perform the comparing feature method a simple procedure for segmentation was developed. The main characteristic of the two methods is robust behavior referring to the scan orientation. The procedures were implemented as software modules in a graphic environment.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Chen F, Brown GM, Song M (2000) Overview of three dimensional shape measurement using optical methods. Opt Eng 39:10–22
Karbacher S, Häusler G, Schonfeld H (1999) Reverse Engineering using optical range sensors. Handbook of computer vision and applications. Academic, San Diego
Huang H, Zerncke R (1996) Localization and comparison of two free-form surfaces. CAD 28(12):1017–1022
Kase K, Makinouchi A, Nakagawa T, Suzuki H, Kimura F (1999) Shape error evaluation method offree-form surfaces. CAD 31:495–505
Yadong L, Peihua G (2004) Free-form surface inspection techniques, state of the art review. CAD 36:1395–1417
Weiß V, Andor L, Renner G, Váradi T (2002) Advanced surface fitting techniques. Comput Aided Geom Des 19:19–42
Piegl L, Richard M (1995) Tessellating trimmed nurbs surfaces. CAD 27:16–26
Beck JM, Farouki RT, K HJ (1986) Surface analysis methods. IEEE Comput Graph App l6:18–36
Hagen H, Hahmann S, T S (1995) Visualization and computation of curvature behavior of free form curves and surfaces. CAD 27:545–552
Meyer M, Desbrun M, Schröeder P, Barr AH (2002) Discrete differential-geometry operators for triangulated 2- manifolds. In: VisMath ’02, vol 25
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Orazi, L., Tani, G. Geometrical inspection of designed and acquired surfaces. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34, 149–155 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0587-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0587-2