Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Surface quality evaluation in ultrasonic drilling through the Taguchi technique

  • ORIGINAL ARTICLE
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Ultrasonic drilling of commercially pure titanium and titanium alloy (Ti-6Al-4v) was investigated in this study. During the experiments, process parameters such as work piece, grit size, slurry concentration, power rating and tools were changed to explore their effect on the surface roughness. Taguchi’s technique was applied to obtain an optimal setting of ultrasonic drilling (USD) process parameters. Average surface roughness (Ra) was measured by using the Optical Profiling System. Two-dimensional and three-dimensional contour plots were obtained from the profiling system to quantify and visualize the surface roughness. From the experimental results and further analysis, it is concluded that the effect of slurry concentration and grit size have a significant effect on surface roughness more than other parameters. In addition, the surface roughness is apparently similar in two and three dimensions as visualized from contour plots. Ultrasonic drilling is established as a material removal process with good surface quality.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Banerjii R, Bhattacharyya BC (1993) Evolutionary operation (EVOP) to optimize three-dimensional biological experiments. Biotechnol Bioeng 41:67–71

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bendell JD, Disney J, Pridmore WA (1989) Taguchi methods: applications in world industry. IFS Publications, Bedford

    Google Scholar 

  3. Byrne DM, Taguchi S (1987) The Taguchi approach to parameter design. Qual Prog 19–26, December

  4. Chen CY, Ling YC (1992) Optimizing electron-capture detector performance for gas chromatographic analysis of polychlorinated biphenyls. Chromatography 33:272–278

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Cobb BD, Clarkson JM (1994) A simple procedure for optimizing the polymerase chain reaction (PCR) using modified Taguchi methods. Nucleic Acids Res 22(18):3801–3805

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Dam H, Schreiber MP, Quist P (1995) Productivity, surface quality and tolerances in ultrasonic machining of ceramics. J Mater Process Technol 51(1–4):358–368

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Dawson EA, Barnes PA (1992) A new approach to the statistical optimization of catalyst preparation. Appl Catal A Gen 90:217–231

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Guzzo PL, Raslan AA, Demello JDB (2003) Ultrasonic abrasion of quartz crystals. Wear 255:67–77

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Hong SY, Markus I, Jeong W (2001) New cooling approach and tool life improvement in cryogenic machining of titanium alloy Ti-6Al-4V. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 41:2245–2260

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Ishikawa K (1976) Guide to quality control, Chap. 3. Asian Productivity Organization, Tokyo

    Google Scholar 

  11. Ito S, Nakamura M, Kanematsu W (1987) Machining of high performance ceramics. Bull Jpn Soc Precis Eng 21(3):167–172

    Google Scholar 

  12. Kennedy DK, Grieve RG (1975) Ultrasonic machining – a review. Prod Eng 54:481

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Kazantsev VF (1973) Ultrasonic cutting. In: Rozenberg LD (ed) Physical principles of ultrasonic technology, vol 1. Plenum Press, New York, pp 3–37

    Google Scholar 

  14. Komaraiah M, Narasimha Reddy P (1993) A study on the influence of work piece properties in ultrasonic machining. Int J Mach Tools Manuf 33(3):495–505

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kremer D, Saleh SM, Ghabrial SR, Moisan A (1981) The state of art of ultrasonic machining. Ann CIRP

  16. Markov AI (1966) Ultrasonic machining of intractable materials. Ilife Books Limited, London

    Google Scholar 

  17. McGeough JA (1988) Advanced methods of machining. Chapman and Hall, New York, pp 170–198

    Google Scholar 

  18. Nakai S, Koide K, Eugster K (1984) A new mapping super simplex optimization for food product and process development. J Food Science 49:1143–1170

    Article  Google Scholar 

  19. Ross Philip J (1988) Taguchi technique for quality engineering. Ann CIRP 30(1):107–110

    Google Scholar 

  20. Saranya AH (2003) Investigation of the effect of process parameters on the quality of hole drilled by ultrasonic machining. M Tech Dissertation, IIT Roorkee

  21. Sonic-Mill: “User’s Manual,” Sonic-Mill, Albuquerque, NM 87121–1962, USA

  22. Sreekumar O, Chand N, Basappa AC (1999) Optimization and interaction of media components in ethanol production using zymomonas mobilis by response surface methodology. J Biosci Bioeng 88(3):334–338

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Stone RA, Veevers A (1994) The Taguchi influence on designed experiments. J Chemometr 8:103–110

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Taguchi G (1987) System of experimental design. Engineering methods to optimize quality and minimize costs. Kraus International, White Plains, NY

    Google Scholar 

  25. Tunga R, Banerjii R, Bhattacharyya BC (1999) Optimization of n variable biological experiments by evolutionary operation-fractional design technique. J Biosci Bioeng 87(2):224–230

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Dvivedi.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Dvivedi, A., Kumar, P. Surface quality evaluation in ultrasonic drilling through the Taguchi technique. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 34, 131–140 (2007). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0586-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-006-0586-3

Keywords

Navigation