Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimal machining allocation of clutch assembly

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Nowadays tolerance optimization is increasingly becoming an important tool for manufacturing and mechanical design. This seemingly, arbitrary task of assigning dimension tolerance can have a large effect on the cost and performance of manufactured products. With the increase in competition in today’s market place, small savings in cost or small increase in performance may determine the success of a product. In practical applications, tolerances are most often assigned as informal compromises between functional quality and manufacturing cost. Frequently the compromise is obtained interactively by trial and error. A more scientific approach is often desirable for better performance. In this paper particle swarm optimization (PSO) is used for the optimal machining tolerance allocation of over running clutch assembly to obtain the global optimal solution. The objective is to obtain optimum tolerances of the individual components for the minimum cost of manufacturing. The result obtained by PSO is compared with the geometric programming (GP) and genetic algorithm (GA) and the performance of the result are analyzed .

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Michael W, Siddall JN (1982) The optimal tolerance assignment with less than full acceptance. ASME J Mech Des 104:855–860

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Lee WJ, Woo TC (1990) Tolerances: their analysis and synthesis. J Eng Ind 112:113–121

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Gadallah MH, ElMaraghy HA (1994) A new algorithm for discrete tolerance optimization. Proc Fourth International Conference on Computer Integrated Manufacturing and Automation Technology (IEEE Comput Soc Press), pp 292–297

  4. Choi H-GR, Park M-H, Salisbury E (2000) Optimal tolerance allocation with loss functions. J Manuf Sci Eng Trans ASME 122:529–535

    Google Scholar 

  5. Cho B-R, Kim YJ, Kimbler DL, Phillips MD (2000) An integrated joint optimization procedure for robust and tolerance design. Int J Prod Res 38:2309–2325

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  6. Feng C-X, Wang J, Wang J-S (2001) An optimization model for concurrent selection of tolerances and suppliers. Comput Ind Eng 40:15–33

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Kopardekar P, Anand S (1995) Tolerance allocation using neural networks. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 10:269–276

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Dupinet E, Balazinski M, Czogala E (1996) Tolerance allocation based on fuzzy logic and simulated annealing. J Intell Manuf 7:487–497

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Ji S, Li X, Ma Y, Cai H (2000)Optimal tolerance allocation based on fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 16(7):461–468

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Chen T-C, Fischer GW (2000) A GA–based search method for the tolerance allocation problem . Int J Artif Intell Eng 14:133–141

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Ji S, Li X, Du R (2000) Tolerance synthesis using second fuzzy comprehensive evaluation and genetic algorithm. Int J Prod Res 38(15):3471–3483

    Article  MATH  Google Scholar 

  12. Noorul Haq A, Sivakumar K, Saravanan R, Muthiah V (2005) Tolerance design optimization machine elements using genetic algorithm. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25:385–391

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Feng C-X, Kusiak A (1997) Robust tolerance design with the integer programming approach. Journal of Manufacturing Science and Engineering: Transactions of the ASME 119:603–610

    Google Scholar 

  14. Eberhart R, Kennedy J (1995) A new optimizer using particle swarm theory. Proc Sixth International Symposium on Micro Machine and Human Science Nagoya, Japan, IEEE Service Center, Piscataway, NJ, pp 39–43

  15. Eberhart RC, Shi Y (2000) Comparing inertia weights and constriction factors in particle swarm optimization. 2000 Congress on Evolutionary Computing 1:84–88

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to A. Noorul Haq.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Noorul Haq, A., Karthikeyan, K., Sivakumar, K. et al. Particle swarm optimization (PSO) algorithm for optimal machining allocation of clutch assembly. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 27, 865–869 (2006). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2274-5

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-004-2274-5

Keywords

Navigation