Skip to main content
Log in

A graph and matrix representation scheme for functional design of mechanical products

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

This paper presents a graph and matrix representation scheme for the functional design of mechanical products, which provides a good basis to generate an explicit and comprehensive functional model used for functional reasoning. Three key features of the scheme are (1) The representation of the causal way behaviors are interconnected; (2) The representation of two types of functional relations: decomposed into and supported by; and (3) Support for diverse functional reasoning paths: three alternative B-FES/e paths are currently available. The scheme can guide functional design of mechanical products through functional reasoning steps including functional supportive synthesis, causal behavioral reasoning and functional decomposition. The developed functional model and its representation applied in a knowledge-based design environment can speed up the functional design process by automating functional reasoning steps. The proposed approach has been evaluated with a functional design example of a terminal cutoff unit in an automatic assembly system for manufacturing electronic connectors.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Pahl G, Beitz W (1996) Engineering design – a systematic approach, 2nd edn. Springer, London

  2. Otto K, Wood K (2001) Product design: techniques in reverse engineering and new product development. Prentice-Hall, Upper Saddle River, NJ

    Google Scholar 

  3. Tor SB, Britton GA, Chandrashekar M, Ng KW (1998) Functional design. In: Usher J, Roy U, Parsaei H (eds) Integrated product and process development: methods, tools and technologies. Wiley, New York, pp 29–58

  4. Bracewell RH, Sharpe JEE (1996) Functional descriptions used in computer support for qualitative scheme generation – ‘schemebuilder’. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(4):333–345

    Google Scholar 

  5. Umeda Y, Ishii M, Yoshioka M, et al. (1996) Supporting conceptual design based on the function-behavior-state modeler. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(4):275–288

    Google Scholar 

  6. Deng Y-M, Tor SB, Britton GA (2000) Abstracting and exploring functional design information for conceptual product design. Eng Comput 16:36–52

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Tor SB, Britton GA, Zhang WY, Deng Y-M (2002) Guiding functional design through rule-based causal behavioral reasoning. Int J Prod Res 40:667–682

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Giarratano J, Riley G (1998) Expert systems: principles and programming, 3rd edn. PWS, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  9. Chakrabarti A, Blessing L (1996) Special issue: representing functionality in design. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(4):251–253

    Google Scholar 

  10. de Kleer J, Brown JS (1984) A qualitative physics based on confluences. Artif Intell 24:7–83

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Paynter HM (1961) Analysis and design of engineering systems. MIT Press, Cambridge, MA

  12. Rosenberg RC, Karnopp DC (1983) Introduction to physical system dynamics. McGraw-Hill, New York

  13. Lind M (1994) Modeling goals and functions of complex industrial plants. Applied artificial intelligence. 8(2):259–283

  14. Szykman S, Racz J, Sriram R (1999) The representation of function in computer-based design. Proceedings of the ASME design theory and methodology conference, DETC99/DTM-8742, Las Vegas, NV

  15. Chittaro L, Ranon R (1999) Diagnosis of multiple faults with flow-based functional models: the functional diagnosis with efforts and flows approach. Reliab Eng Syst Safety 64:137–150

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Umeda Y, Takeda H, Tomiyama T, et al. (1990) Function, behavior and structure. In: Gero JS (ed) Applications of artificial intelligence in engineering V. Springer-Verlag, Berlin, pp 177–193

  17. Qian L, Gero JS (1996) Function-behavior-structure paths and their role in analogy-based design. Artif Intell Eng Des Anal Manuf 10(4):289–312

    Google Scholar 

  18. Goel A (1991) Model revision: a theory of incremental model learning, Proceedings of the 8th International Conference on Machine Learning, Chicago, IL. Morgan Kaufmann, Los Altos, CA, pp 605–609

    Google Scholar 

  19. Prabhakar S, Goel A (1998) Functional modeling for enabling adaptive design of devices for new environments. Artif Intell Eng 12:417–444

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Forbus K (1984) Qualitative process theory. Artif Intell 24(3):85–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Deng Y-M, Britton GA, Tor SB (1998) A design perspective of mechanical function and its object-oriented representation scheme. Eng Comput 14:309–320

    Google Scholar 

  22. Zhang WY, Tor SB, Britton GA (2002) An approach of two-level modeling to acquire functional design knowledge in mechanical engineering systems. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 19(6):454–460

    Article  Google Scholar 

  23. Valero A, Torres C (1988) Algebraic thermodynamic analysis of energy systems. Approaches to the Design Optimization of Thermal Systems, ASME AES-7, pp 13–23

  24. Li CL, Tan ST, Chan KW (1996) A qualitative and heuristic approach to the conceptual design of mechanisms. Eng Appl Artif Intell 9(1):17–31

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W.Y. Zhang.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Zhang, W., Tor, S. & Britton, G. A graph and matrix representation scheme for functional design of mechanical products. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 25, 221–232 (2005). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1827-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1827-3

Keywords

Navigation