Skip to main content
Log in

Measuring manufacturing capability based on lower confidence bounds of C pmk applied to current transmitter process

  • Original Article
  • Published:
The International Journal of Advanced Manufacturing Technology Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Several process capability indices, including C p, C pk, and C pm, have been proposed to provide numerical measures on manufacturing potential and actual performance. Combining the advantages of those indices, a more advanced index C pmk is proposed, taking the process variation, centre of the specification tolerance, and the proximity to the target value into account, which has been shown to be a useful capability index for manufacturing processes with two-sided specification limits. In this paper, we consider the estimation of C pmk, and we develop an efficient algorithm to compute the lower confidence bounds on C pmk based on the estimation, which presents a measure on the minimum manufacturing capability of the process based on the sample data. We also provide tables for practitioners to use in measuring their processes. A real-world example of current transmitters taken from a microelectronics device manufacturing process is investigated to illustrate the applicability of the proposed approach. Our implementation of the existing statistical theory for manufacturing capability assessment bridges the gap between the theoretical development and the in-plant applications.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1.
Fig 2. a
Fig. 3. a
Fig. 4.
Fig. 5.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Chan LK, Cheng SW, Spiring FA (1988) A new measure of process capability: Cpm. J Qual Technol 20(3):162–175

    Google Scholar 

  2. Chen SM, Hsu NF (1995) The asymptotic distribution of the process capability index: Cpmk. Commun Stat Theory Methods 24:1279–1291

    Google Scholar 

  3. Jessenberger J, Weihs C (2000) A note on the behavior of Cpmk with asymmetric specification limits. J Qual Technol 32(4):440–443

    Google Scholar 

  4. Kane VE (1986) Process capability indices. J Qual Technol 18(1):41–52

    Google Scholar 

  5. Pearn WL, Kotz S, Johnson NL (1992) Distributional and inferential properties of process capability indices. J Qual Technol 24:216–231

    Google Scholar 

  6. Pearn WL, Chen KS (1997) Multiprocess performance analysis: a case study. Qual Eng 10(1):1–8

    Google Scholar 

  7. Pearn WL, Chen KS, Lin PC (1999) On the generalizations of the capability index Cpmk for asymmetric tolerances. Far East J Theor Stat 3(1):47–66

    Google Scholar 

  8. Pearn WL, Yang SL, Chen KS, Lin PC (2001) Testing process capability using the index Cpmk with an application. Int J Reliability Qual Saf Eng 8(1):15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Pearn WL, Lin PC, Chen KS (2002) Estimating process capability index Cpmk for asymmetric tolerances: distributional properties. Metrika 54(3):261–279

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Pearn WL, Lin GH (2003) A Bayesian like estimator of the process capability index Cpmk. Metrika 57:303–312

    Google Scholar 

  11. Pearn WL, Lin PC (2002) Computer program for calculating the p-value in testing process capability Index Cpmk. Qual Reliability Eng Int 18(4):333–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Pearn WL, Ko CH, Wang KH (2002) A multiprocess performance analysis chart based on the incapability index Cpp: an application to the chip resistors. Microelectron Reliability 42(7):1121–1125

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Singhal SC (1991) Multiprocess performance analysis chart (MPPAC) with capability zones. Qual Eng 4(1):75–81

    Google Scholar 

  14. Wright PA (1998) The probability density function of process capability index Cpmk. Commun Stat Theory Methods 27(7):1781–1789

    Google Scholar 

  15. Montgomery DC (2001) Introduction to statistical quality control, 4th ed. John Wiley and Sons, New York.

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to W. L. Pearn.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Pearn, W.L., Shu, MH. Measuring manufacturing capability based on lower confidence bounds of C pmk applied to current transmitter process. Int J Adv Manuf Technol 23, 116–125 (2004). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1693-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00170-003-1693-z

Keywords

Navigation