Skip to main content
Log in

The neglected heterogeneity of spatial agglomeration and co-location patterns of creative employment: evidence from Portugal

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Empirical literature on the geographical location of creative activities has been traditionally based on the spatial analysis of industries, often disregarding the creative employment that lies outside the necessarily limited boundaries of creative industries. As an extension to the most recent methodologies using industry and occupational data on industrial cluster analysis, this paper analyses agglomeration and co-location patterns of core creative activities, considering both ‘embedded’ (creative professionals working outside the creative sectors) and ‘specialized’ (creative professionals working in the creative sectors) creative employment. Using location quotients and principal component factor and cluster analyses, applied to all 308 Portuguese municipalities, we found that the geographical agglomeration and co-location patterns of core creative groups differ substantially. The typical arguments sustained by the literature—the tendency of creative industries/employment to agglomerate and co-locate in large metropolises—are only supported in the case of knowledge-intensive activities subjected to Intellectual Property Rights, most notably ‘Advertising/Marketing’, ‘Publishing’, ‘TV/Radio’, and ‘Software/Digital Media’, densely concentrated and co-located in highly developed, large urban centres, with high levels of human capital. These arguments do not hold for the traditional creative activities of ‘Architecture’, ‘Design/Visual Arts’ and ‘Crafts’, which, although co-located, appear mostly dispersed with small concentrations around intermediate urban centres. ‘Teaching/training/research’ present quite dispersed geographical patterns with some clusterization around municipalities with tertiary education institutions. ‘Film/video/photography’ and ‘Music/Performing Arts’ show some dispersion throughout the Portuguese territory with concentration around small urban centres and in rural areas. It is evident that, from agglomeration to co-location patterns, creative employment reveals heterogeneous characteristics across creative groups.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Notes

  1. To have an idea, a search in the Scopus database with the keywords ‘creative industries’ or ‘creative occupations’ yielded 554 articles using these keywords in the fields ‘title’, ‘abstract’ and ‘keywords’. Adding the keyword ‘location’ to the search only returns 37 articles (and 54 articles if the word ‘geography’ is added), 6 % (9 %) of the unrestricted search on creative industries and occupations.

  2. According to the latest data available (2009), national employment in the private, structured sector totalled 3.128.126 workers. It covers all employment in industries and establishments operating in the national territory with at least one employee, excluding Public Administration and self-employment. Cruz and Teixeira (2013) discuss the implications of such exclusions in the estimation of core creative employment.

  3. Factor analysis assesses the structure of a set of interrelated observed variables in order to find a low number of intrinsic/latent factors that may partially explain the behaviour of original variables. If two variables are (not spuriously) correlated, their interdependency results from a common, not directly observable feature, i.e. a latent factor (Maroco 2011: 471).

  4. A simple industry-based analysis was complementarily undertaken. It yielded modest results when compared to the present industry and occupational analysis. Data on industry/SIC sectors only served to conclude that core creative industries are agglomerated and co-located in two large urban centres: Lisbon and Oeiras.

References

  • Andersen K, Hansen H, Isaksen A, Raunio M (2010) Nordic city regions in the creative class debate—putting the creative class thesis to a test. Ind Innov 17(2):215–240

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Barbour E, Markusen A (2007) Regional occupational and industrial structure: Does one imply the other? Int Reg Sci Rev 30(1):72–90

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bathelt H (2002) The re-emergence of a media industry cluster in Leipzig. Eur Plan Stud 10(5):583–611

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bertacchini E, Borrione P (2013) The geography of the Italian creative economy: the special role of the design and craft-based industries. Reg Stud 47(2):135–147

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boix R, Lazzeretti L, Capone F, De Propris L, Sánchez D (2013) The geography of creative industries in Europe: comparing France, Great Britain, Italy and Spain. In: Lazzeretti L (ed) Creative industries and innovation in Europe: concepts, measures and comparative case studies. Routledge, New York, pp 23–44

    Google Scholar 

  • Borén T, Young C (2013) The migration dynamics of the “creative class”: evidence from a study of artists in Stockholm, Sweden. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 103(1):195–210

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boschma R, Fritsch M (2009) Creative class and regional growth: empirical evidence from seven European countries. Econ Geogr 85(4):391–423

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Campbell-Kelly M, Danilevsky M, Garcia-Swartz D, Pederson S (2010) Clustering in the creative industries: insights from the origins of computer software. Ind Innov 17(3):309–329

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Capone F (2008) Mapping and analysing creative systems in Italy (1991–2001). In: Cooke P, Lazzeretti L (eds) Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development, Chapter 14. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 338–364

    Google Scholar 

  • Chapain C, Cooke P, De Propris L, MacNeill S, Mateos-Garcia J (2010) Creative clusters and innovation. Putting creativity on the map. NESTA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Clifton N, Cooke P (2010) Creative knowledge workers and location in Europe and North America: a comparative review. Creat Ind J 2(1):73–89

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cruz S, Teixeira A (2013) Assessing the magnitude of creative employment: a comprehensive mapping and estimation of existing methodologies. Eur Plan Stud. doi:10.1080/09654313.2013.822475

  • Currid E, Stolarick K (2010a) The occupation-industry mismatch: new trajectories for regional cluster analysis and economic development. Urban Stud 47(2):337–362

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currid E, Stolarick K (2010b) Cultural capital and metropolitan distinction: views of Los Angeles and New York. City Cult Soc 1:217–223

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currid E, Williams S (2010) Two cities, five industries: similarities and differences within and between cultural industries in New York and Los Angeles. J Plan Educ Res 29:322–335

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Currid-Halkett E, Stolarick K (2011) The arts: not just artists (and vice versa). In: Andersson D, Andersson A, Mellander C (eds) The handbook of creative cities. Edward Elgar Publishing, London/New York, pp 259–283

    Google Scholar 

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (1998) Creative industries mapping document 1998. DCMS, London

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (2001) Creative industries mapping document 2001. DCMS, London

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (2010) Creative industries economic estimates—December 2010 (experimental statistics)—full statistical release. DCMS, London. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/77514/CIEE_Full_Release_Dec2010.pdf. Accessed June 2014

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (2011) Creative industries economic estimates—December 2011. DCMS, London. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/creative-industries-economic-estimates-december-2011. Accessed June 2014

  • Department for Culture, Media and Sport (DCMS) (2014) Creative industries economic estimates January 2014 statistical release. DCMS, London. Available online at: https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/271008/Creative_Industries_Economic_Estimates_-_January_2014.pdf. Accessed June 2014

  • De Propris L, Chapain C, Cooke P, MacNeill S, Mateos-García J (2009) The geography of creativity. NESTA Interim Report, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Faggian A, Comunian R, Jewell S, Kelly U (2013) Bohemian graduates in the UK: disciplines and location determinants of creative careers. Reg Stud 47(2):183–200

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002a) The rise of the creative class—and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life. Basic Books, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2002b) The economic geography of talent. Ann Assoc Am Geogr 92(4):743–755

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Florida R (2004) The rise of the creative class—and how it’s transforming work, leisure, community and everyday life (revised, paperback ed). Basic Books, New York

  • Florida R (2005) The flight of the creative class: the new global competition for talent. Harper Collins Publishers, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Florida R, Mellander C, Stolarick K (2008) Inside the black box of regional development—human capital, the creative class and tolerance. J Econ Geogr 8:615–649

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M, Stuetzer M (2009) The geography of creative people in Germany. Int J Foresight Innov Policy 5(1/2/3):7–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fritsch M, Stuetzer M (2012) The geography of creative people in Germany revisited. Jena Econ Res. Papers no. 2012/065

  • Hansen H, Asheim B, Vang J (2009) The European creative class and regional development: How relevant is Florida’s theory for Europe? In: Kong L, O’ Connor J (eds) Creative economies, creative cities: Asian-European perspectives. Springer, Dordrecht, pp 99–120

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Hansen H, Niedomysl T (2009) Migration of the creative class: evidence from Sweden. J Econ Geogr 9:191–206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Higgs P, Cunningham S, Bakshi H (2008) Beyond the creative industries: mapping the creative economy in the United Kingdom. National Endowment for Science, Technology and the Arts (NESTA), London

    Google Scholar 

  • Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Vintage, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Kolenda R, Yang Liu C (2012) Are central cities more creative? The intra-metropolitan geography of creative industries. J Urban Affairs 34(5):487–512

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke S (2002) Network analysis of production clusters: the Potsdam/Babelsberg film industry as an example. Eur Plan Stud 10(1):27–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krätke S (2010) Creative cities’ and the rise of the dealer class: a critique of Richard Florida’s approach to urban theory. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(4):835–853

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti L (2013) Creative industries and innovation in Europe: concepts, measures and comparative case studies. Routledge, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti L, Boix R, Capone F (2008) Do creative industries cluster? Mapping creative local production systems in Italy and Spain. Ind Innov 15(5):549–567

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lazzeretti L, Capone F, Boix R (2012) Reasons for clustering of creative industries in Italy and Spain. Eur Plan Stud 20(8):1243–1262

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen M, Frederiksen L (2008) Why do cultural industries cluster? Localization, urbanization, products and projects. In: Cooke P, Lazzeretti L (eds) Creative cities, cultural clusters and local economic development, Cheltenham, Chapter 7. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham, pp 155–179

    Google Scholar 

  • Lorenzen M, Andersen K (2009) Centrality and creativity: Does Richard Florida’s creative class offer new insights into urban hierarchy? Econ Geogr 85(4):363–390

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Markusen A, Wassall G, DeNatale D, Cohen R (2008) Defining the creative economy: industry and occupational approaches. Econ Dev Q 22(1):24–45

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Maroco J (2011) Análise Estatística com o SPSS statistics, 2nd edn. Report Number, Pero Pinheiro

  • Martin-Brelot H, Grossetti M, Eckert D, Gritsai O, Kovács Z (2010) The spatial mobility of the ‘creative class’: a European perspective. Int J Urban Reg Res 34(4):854–870

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mellander C (2009) Creative and knowledge industries: an occupational distribution approach. Econ Dev Q 23(4):294–305

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miguel-Molina B, Hervas-Oliver J, Boix R, Miguel-Molina M (2012) The importance of creative industry agglomerations in explaining the wealth of European regions. Eur Plan Stud 20(8):1263–1280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Pratt A (2006) Advertising and creativity, a governance approach: a case study of creative agencies in London. Environ Plan A 38(10):1883–1899

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Roodhouse S (2006) Cultural quarters: principles and practice. Intellect, Bristol

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (2000) The cultural economy of cities. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Scott A (2002) A new map of hollywood: the production and distribution of American motion pictures. Reg Stud 36(9):957–975

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Stoneman P (2009) Soft innovation: towards a more complete picture of innovative change. NESTA, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Turok I (2003) Cities, clusters and creative industries: the case of film and television in Scotland. Eur Plan Stud 11(5):549–565

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • UNCTAD (2008) Creative economy—report 2008. UNDP/UNCTAD, Geneva

  • Wiesand A, Söndermann M (2005) The “creative sector”—an engine for diversity, growth and jobs in Europe. European Cultural Foundation, Amsterdam

    Google Scholar 

  • Wu W (2005) Dynamic cities and creative clusters. World Bank Policy Research Working Paper 3509, February

Download references

Acknowledgments

A word of sincere appreciation to the referees for their insightful comments and suggestions. The authors are also grateful to Professor Armindo Carvalho (Faculdade de Economia, Universidade do Porto, Portugal) for the valuable suggestions. We acknowledge the courtesy of the GEE/MEE—Gabinete de Estratégia e Estudos/Ministry of Economy and Employment, Portugal, for permitting the access to data which turned this study possible. The GEE/MEE is not responsible for the results and interpretations contained in this paper. These are of the authors’ full responsibility. This study had the financial support of the Portuguese government—Foundation for Science and Technology (FCT), Ministry of Education and Science, and was co-financed by the European Social Fund (FCT Doctoral Grant SFRH-BD-69571-2010).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Aurora A. C. Teixeira.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Cruz, S.S., Teixeira, A.A.C. The neglected heterogeneity of spatial agglomeration and co-location patterns of creative employment: evidence from Portugal. Ann Reg Sci 54, 143–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0649-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-014-0649-6

JEL Classification

Navigation