Abstract
Are ethnic minorities more likely to emigrate from the new EU Member States? Who are the potential minority and majority migrants? This paper studies emigration intentions of the Russian speaking minority in Latvia after the 2004 EU enlargement. Using a survey on emigration intentions conducted in 2005, I show that the minority is more likely to emigrate than the majority. For the Russian speakers, higher education levels tend to be associated with higher probability of emigration, suggesting a minority brain drain. These findings can be explained by (1) linguistic and citizenship policies potentially disadvantaging Russian speakers in the Latvian labour market; (2) family migration capital; and (3) low acceptance of the way in which minority education is provided.
Similar content being viewed by others
Notes
The share of ethnic minorities varies from 1.2 % in Poland to 41 % in Latvia. Romania hosts the highest absolute population of minorities (2,310,000) among the new EU Members States. Source: author’s calculations based on Predan (2004).
The official average yearly emigration rate (the number of emigrants as % of total population) has been as follows: 1.46 % in 1991–1994; 0.46 % in 1995–1999; 0.20 % in 2000–2003; and 0.24 % in 2004–2010 (source: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia). The official emigration statistics significantly underestimate actual work emigration as people going for work abroad do not have to inform the state authorities about their move. It is also not possible to disaggregate the publically available statistics on emigration by migrants’ ethnicity. The high emigration rate in early 1990s reflects the ethnic return migration (predominantly) to the Russian Federation.
See SKDS (2005) for the survey report.
The share of non-citizens in Latvian population decreased from 25 % in 1994 (when the status was introduced) to 15 % in 2011 (source: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia). To acquire the Latvian citizenship, the applicant must pass the exams of the State language, history, and constitution. The process of naturalisation takes on average 8 months (source: Naturalisation Board of the Republic of Latvia, www.np.gov.lv).
In addition, up until 2007, the non-citizens needed visas for travel in the EU countries. In 2007 the non-citizens obtained the right to travel visa-free within the Schengen area, but they still need work permits to work in the EU countries.
A widening male wage gap in favour of native-speaking population has also been reported in Estonia (Leping and Toomet 2007), a country which adopted very similar linguistic and citizenship legislation vis-à-vis the Russian speaking minority.
The ethnically divided education system as well as high concentration of the Russian speaking minority in particular localities (the capital, big cities, the Latgale region) could explain why there has been limited linguistic integration in Latvia.
In Latvia, a person’s official ethnic origin (tautība in Latvian) cannot be different from that of his or her parents; if the parents have different ethnicity, the person can choose. Until 2000, the ethnic origin appeared in the main identification document (passport); after 2000 one could choose whether to indicate ethnicity in the passport (but it still has to be recorded in the State Population Register).
In 2006, 21.7 % of ethnic Latvian men and 19.9 % of ethnic Latvian women were married to ethnic non-Latvians. Source: Central Statistical Bureau of Latvia, www.csb.gov.lv.
Respondents were asked: ‘Thinking about work migration abroad, what would be your preferred destination?’
Given that Table 2 reports unconditional means, this does not contradict with the finding of Hazans (2005) that the earnings of the minority are higher than the earnings of the majority. Regressing the average monthly income per family member (the variable which is the closest proxy for individual earnings in our survey) on the respondents’ linguistic background, other observable socio-demographic characteristics, and district fixed effects also reveals a premium of 13 LVL (significant at 10 %) for the majority.
Excluding respondents who do not report their income would reduce the sample by one quarter.
Recall that the non-citizens of Latvia are not considered citizens of the EU and cannot work freely within the EU. In addition, at the moment of interviews (December 2005) non-citizens of Latvia needed visas to travel within the EU.
Excluding individuals who did not report their emigration intentions could result in selection bias and inconsistent estimates. I apply Heckman selection procedure to check whether the problem is present. Using information on whether or not a respondent answered a question on attitudes towards immigration as identification variable, I find no evidence of selection bias.
References
Bardhan P (1997) Method in the madness? A political economy analysis of the ethnic conflicts in less developed countries. World Dev 25(9):1381–1398
Barrington L (2000) Understanding citizenship policy in the Baltic states. In: Klusmeyer D, Aleinikoff A (eds) From migrants to citizens. Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, Washington, DC, pp 253–301
BBC (2010) France sends Roma Gypsies back to Romania, 20 Aug 2010. Available at http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/world-europe-11020429
Beine M, Docquier F, Ozden C (2008) ‘Diasporas’, a paper presented at the conference ‘Migration and Development’. University of Lille, Lille. Available at http://go.worldbank.org/09Y2WTJOX0
Burda MC, Härdle W, Müller M, Werwatz A (1998) Semiparametric analysis of German east-west migration intentions: facts and theory. J Appl Econom 13(5):525–541
Docquier F, Rapoport H (2003) Ethnic discrimination and the migration of skilled labor. J Dev Econ 70(1):159–172
Drinkwater S, Ingram P (2009) How different are the British in their willingness to move? evidence from international social survey data. Reg Stud 43(2):287–303
Epstein GS, Gang IN (2006) The influence of others on migration plans. Rev Dev Econ 10(4):652–665
Hazans M (2005) Unemployment and the earnings structure in Latvia, World Bank Policy Research Working Paper No. 3504. Available at http://ssrn.com/abstract=659103
Heleniak T (2004) Migration of the Russian diaspora after the breakup of the Soviet Union. J Int Aff 57(2):99–117
Horowitz DL (1998) Structure and strategy in ethnic conflict: a few steps towards synthesis. In: Pleskovic B, Stiglitz JE (eds) Annual World Bank Conference on Development Economics, The World Bank
Hughes J (2005) “Exit” in deeply divided societies: regimes of discrimination in Estonia and Latvia and the potential for Russophone migration. J Common Mark Stud 43(4):739–762
Ivlevs A, King R (2012) Family migration capital and migration intentions. J Fam Econ Iss 33(1):118–129. doi:10.1007/s10834-011-9269-9 (Published online first on 5 Aug 2011)
Karklins R (1994) Ethnic politics and transition to democracy: the collapse of the USSR and Latvia. Woodrow Wilson Center Press and Johns Hopkins University Press, Baltimore
Laitin D (1998) Identity in formation: the Russian-speaking populations in the near abroad. Cornell University Press, New York
Leping K, Toomet O (2007) Ethnic wage gap and political break-ups: Estonia during political and economic transition. Tartu University, Faculty of Economics and Business Administration Working Paper No.39/2007
Liebig T, Sousa-Poza A (2004) Migration, self-selection and income inequality: an international analysis. Kyklos 57:125–146
Massey D, Arango J, Hugo G, Kouaouci A, Pellegrino A, Taylor E (2005) Worlds in motion. Understanding international migration at the end of the millennium. Clarendon Press, Oxford
McKenzie D, Rapoport H (2007) Network effects and the dynamics of migration and inequality: theory and evidence from Mexico. J Dev Econ 84(1):1–24
Muiznieks N (2005) ‘Response to James Hughes. Dev Trans 2:26–27. UNDP/London School of Economic and Political Science
Munz R, Ohliger R (eds) (2003) Diasporas and ethnic migrant: Germany. Israel and post-Soviet successor states in comparative perspective. Frank Cass, London
Papapanagos H, Sanfey P (2001) Intention to emigrate in transition countries: the case of Albania. J Popul Econ 14(3):491–504
Predan M (ed) (2004) Minorities and the Central European initiative : on the occasion of the 10th anniversary of the CEI instrument for the protection of minority rights (1994–2004). CEI Executive Secretariat. Available at http://www.ceinet.org/main.php?pageID=64; http://www.ceinet.org/download/CEI_Publication_7.4.05.pdf
Schmid C (2008) Ethnicity and language tensions in Latvia. Lang Policy 7(1):3–19
Schmid C, Zepa B, Snipe A (2004) Language policy and ethnic tensions in Quebec and Latvia. Int J Comp Sociol 45:231–252
Silova I (2002) Bilingual education theater: behind the scenes of Latvian minority education reform. Intercult Educ 13(4):463–476
SKDS (2005) Sabiedrības attieksme pret darbaspēka migrāciju, Riga, Public Opinion Research Centre (SKDS). Available at http://www.politika.lv/index.php?id=6134
Smith G (1996) The ethnic democracy thesis and the citizenship question in Estonia and Latvia. Natl Pap 24(2):57–93
Smooha S (2001) The model of ethnic democracy. ECMI working papers #13. Flensburg, Germany: European Centre for minority issues. Available at http://www.ecmi.de/doc/public_papers.html
Uebelmesser S (2006) To go or not to go: emigration from Germany. Ger Econ Rev 7(2):211–231
United Kingdom Border Agency (UKBA) (2011) Closure of the worker registration scheme. 10 Mar 2011. Available at http://www.ukba.homeoffice.gov.uk/sitecontent/newsarticles/2011/march/24-wrs-closure
van Dalen HP, Henkens K (2008) Emigration intentions: mere words or true plans? Explaining international migration intentions and behavior. Available at SSRN: http://ssrn.com/abstract=1153985
Woolfson C (2009) Labour migration, neo-liberalism and ethno-politics in the New Europe: the case of Latvia. Antipode 41(5):952–982
Zepa B, \({{\check{\text{ S}}}}{\bar{\text{ u}}}\text{ pule}\) I, \(\text{ K}\text{ l}\!\!_{,}\text{ ave}\) E, \(\text{ Krasti}\text{ n}\!\!_{,}\text{ a}\) L, \(\text{ Kri}{\check{\text{ s}}}{\bar{\text{ a}}}\text{ ne}\) J, Tomsone I (2005) Ethnopolitical tension in Latvia: looking for the conflict solution. Baltic Institute of Social Sciences. Available at http://www.biss.soc.lv/downloads/resources/Etnopol_krize/Repot.pdf
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix
Appendix
See Table 8.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Ivlevs, A. Minorities on the move? Assessing post-enlargement emigration intentions of Latvia’s Russian speaking minority. Ann Reg Sci 51, 33–52 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0534-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-012-0534-0