Skip to main content
Log in

Locational and managerial decisions as interdependent choices in the headquarter-manufacturing plant relationship: a theoretical approach

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

The main purpose of the paper is to provide a link between the location decision and the internal organization of vertically integrated firms. The results of the model show that the decisions about location and managerial (de)centralization are interdependent: For certain parameters, firms should change both aspects simultaneously as a response to lower communication costs. The positive correlation between the decentralization of decision-making and geographic decentralization predicted by the model is supported by empirical research.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Aghion P, Tirole J (1997) Formal and real authority in organizations. J Political Econ 105(1): 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras P (2003) Firms, contracts, and trade structure. Q J Econ 118(4): 1374–1418

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Antras P, Helpman E (2004) Global sourcing. J Political Econ 112: 1–29

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Arita T, McCann P (2002) The Relationship between the spatial and hierarchical organization of multiplant firms: observations from the global semiconductor industry. In: McCann P (eds) Industrial location economics. Elgar Publishing Limited, Massachusetts, pp 319–363

    Google Scholar 

  • Birkinshaw J, Morrison AJ (1995) Configurations of strategy and structure in subsidiaries of multinational corporations. J Int Bus Studies 26: 729–753

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Coase R (1937) The Nature of the firm. Economica 4: 386–405

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Constantin F, Giusti G, e Tattara G (2010) Strategies of Italian firms in Romenia: evidence from selected case studies. Trans Studies Rev V 16: 829–847

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crestanello P, e Tattara G (2010) Industrial Clusters and the governance of the global value chain: the Romenia—Veneto network in footwear and clothing. Regional Studies, pp 1–16

  • Delany E (2000) Strategic development of the multinational subsidiary through subsidiary initiative-taking. Long Range Plann 33: 220–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Earle JS, Pagano U, Lesi M (2006) Information technology, organizational form, and transition to the market. J Econ Behav Org 60: 471–489

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Fujita M, Thisse J-F (2006) Globalization and the evolution of the supply chain: who gains and who loses?. Int Econ Rev 47(3): 811–836

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gates SR, Egelhof WG (1986) Centralization in headquarters-subsidiary relationships. J Int Bus Studies 17(2): 71–92

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gereffi G, Humphrey J, e Sturgeon T (2005) The Governance of global value chains. Rev Int Political Econ 12: 78–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Grossman SJ, Hart OD (1986) The Costs and benefits of ownership: a theory of vertical and lateral integration. J Political Econ 94: 691–719

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helpman E (1984) A simple theory of international trade with multinational corporations. J Political Econ 92: 451–471

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jones RW (2000) Globalization and the theory of input trade. the MIT Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RW, Kierzkowski H (1990) The role of services in production and international trade: a theoretical framework. In: Jones RW, Krueger A (eds) The political economy of international trade. Basil Blackwell, Oxford, pp 31–48

    Google Scholar 

  • Jones RW, Kierzkowski H (2003) International trade and agglomeration: an alternative framework (unpublished manuscript)

  • Jones RW, Kierzkowski H (2005) International fragmentation and the new economic geography. North Am J Econ Finance 16: 1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kolko J, Neumark D (2008) Changes in the location of employment and ownership: evidence from California. J Reg Sci 48(4): 717–744

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi R (2007) Offshoring: economic geography and the multinational firm. J Int Bus Studies 38(1): 206

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudambi R (2008) Location, control and innovation in knowledge-intensive industries. J Econ Geogr 8(5): 699–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mudanbi R, Navarra P (2004) Is knowledge power? Knowledge flows subsidiary power and rent-seeking within MNCs. J Int Bus Studies 35(5): 385–406

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Phelps NA, Fuller C (2000) Multinationals, intracorporate competition, and regional development. Econ Geogr 76(3): 224–243

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Puga D, Trefler D (2003) Knowledge creation and control in organizations. NBER Working Paper 9121, November 2003

  • Sheard P (1983) Auto-production system in Japan: organizational and locational features. Aust Geogr Studies 21(1): 49–68

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yomogida M (2007) Fragmentation, welfare, and imperfect competition. J Jpn Int Econ 21: 365–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Carlos Eduardo Lobo e Silva.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

e Silva, C.E.L., Hewings, G.J.D. Locational and managerial decisions as interdependent choices in the headquarter-manufacturing plant relationship: a theoretical approach. Ann Reg Sci 48, 703–717 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0410-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-010-0410-8

JEL Classification

Navigation