Abstract
This paper combines the empirical finding of a functional specialization of cities with regional dynamics. We distinguish between cities dominated by headquarters and service firms (urban agglomerations), those with large stand-alone production plants in one sector (industrial agglomerations), and cities with integrated smaller firms (industrial districts). Based on German data, we find differing dynamics across these three city types. Cities that host basic research or integrated incumbents are more conducive to entrepreneurial activity, whereas the opposite is true of industrial agglomerations. Urban agglomerations dominated by headquarters with only administrative functions and the service sector are not very entrepreneur-friendly, either. However, although this type of city provides few externalities for startups in manufacturing, they could very well provide opportunities for service sector startups.
Article PDF
Similar content being viewed by others
Avoid common mistakes on your manuscript.
References
Aarland K, Davis J, Henderson JV, Ono Y (2007) Spatial organization of firms: the decision to split production and administration. RAND J Econ 38(2): 480–494
Amin A, Thrift N (1992) Neo-Marshallian nodes in global networks. Int J Urban Reg Res 16: 571–587
Audretsch D (1995) Innovation and industry evolution. MIT Press, Cambridge
Audretsch DB, Feldman MP (1996) Innovative clusters and the industry life-cycle. Rev Ind Organ 11: 253–273
Bade F-J, Laaser C-F, Soltwedel R (2003) Urban specialization in the internet age—empirical findings for Germany. Working Paper 1215, Kiel Institute of World Economics
Bauernschuster S, Falck O, Heblich S (2008) Occupational choice and social contacts across regions. Jena Economic Research Papers 2008-079
BBR (2006) ESPON ATLAS. Mapping the structure of the European territory. Bundesamt für Bauwesen und Raumordnung, Bonn
Becattini G (1979) Dal Settore Industriale al Distreto Industriale. Alcune consideración sull’unitá di indagine dell economía industriale. Revista di Economia e Politica Industriale 1: 1–8
Becattini G (1990) The Marshallian industrial district as a socio-economic notion. In: Pyke F, Becattini G, Sengenberger W (eds) Industrial districts and inter-firm cooperation in Italy. International Institute for Labour Studies, Geneva, pp 37–51
Best M (1990) The new competition: institutions of industrial restructuring. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Blundell R, Griffith R, Van Reenen J (1995) Dynamic count data models of technological innovation. Econ J 105: 333–344
Boente W, Heblich S, Falck O (2009) The impact of regional age structure on entrepreneurship. Econ Geogr 85: 269–287
Bramoullé Y, Kranton R (2007) Public goods in networks. J Econ Theory 135: 478–494
Brixy U, Fritsch M (2004) The establishment file of the German social insurance statistics. J Appl Social Sci Stud 124: 183–190
Buenstorf G, Klepper S (2009) Heritage and agglomeration: the akron tire cluster revisited. Econ J 119: 705–733
Callois J-M, Aubert F (2007) Towards indicators of social capital for regional development issues: the case of french rural areas. Reg Stud 41(6): 809–821
Carlton DW (1983) The location and employment choices of new firms: an econometric model with discrete and continuous endogenous variables. Rev Econ Stat 65(3): 440–449
Chandler AD (1977) The visible hand: the managerial revolution in American business. Belknap, Cambridge
Cohen W, Klepper S (1996) Firm size and the nature of innovation within industries: the case of process and product R&D. Rev Econ Stat 78: 232–243
Cooke P (1996) The new wave of regional innovation networks: analysis, characteristics and strategy. Small Bus Econ 8: 159–171
Davis JC, Henderson JV (2008) The agglomeration of headquarters. Reg Sci Urban Econ 38: 445–460
Duranton G, Puga D (2001) Nursery cities: urban diversity, process innovation, and the life cycle of products. Am Econ Rev 91: 1454–1477
Duranton G, Puga D (2005) From sectoral to functional urban specialization. J Urban Econ 57: 343–370
Falck O, Fritsch M, Heblich S (2008) The apple doesn’t fall far from the tree: location of start-ups relative to incumbents. CESifo Working Paper 2486
Fallick B, Fleischman CA, Rebitzer JB (2006) Job-hopping in Silicon valley: some evidence concerning the microfoundations of a high-technology cluster. Rev Econ Stat 88: 472–481
Florida R (2002) Bohemia and Economic Geography. J Econ Geogr 2: 55–71
Fritsch M (2008) How does new business formation affect regional development? Introduction to the special issue. Small Bus Econ 30(1): 1–14
Fujita M, Krugman PR, Venables AJ (1999) The spatial economy—cities, regions, and international trade. MIT Press, Cambridge, http://mitpress.mit.edu/catalog/item/default.asp?ttype=2&tid=8555
Glaeser E (2007) Entrepreneurship and the City, NBER Working Paper 13551
Glaeser E, Kolko J, Saiz A (2001) Consumer city. J Econ Geogr 1: 27–50
Granovetter M (1985) Economic action and social structures: the problem of embeddedness. Am J Sociol 91: 481–510
Greene F, Mole K, Storey DJ (2008) Three decades of enterprise culture. Palgrave, London
Griliches Z (1992) Patent statistics as economic indicator: a survey. J Econ Lit 28: 1661–1707
Grotz R, Brixy U, Otto A (2002) Räumlicher Vergleich der Datengrundlagen zum Gründungs- und Stilllegungsgeschehen in Deutschland. In: Fritsch M, Grotz R (eds) Das Gründungsgeschehen in Deutschland. Physica, Heidelberg, pp 165–198
Guimarães P, Figueiredo O, Woodward D (2000) A tractable approach to the firm location decision problem. Rev Econ Stat 85(1): 201–204
Hamermesh DS, Pfann GA (2003) Plant closings, learning and worker displacement. The Death of Fokker Aircraft, Mimeo
Henderson JV (1988) Urban development: theory, fact, and illusion. Oxford University Press, New York
Henderson JV, Ono Y (2008) Where do manufacturing firms locate their headquarters? J Urban Econ 63: 431–450
Jacobs J (1969) The economy of cities. Random House, New York
Jaffe A, Trajtenberg M, Henderson R (1993) Geographic localization of knowledge spillovers as evidenced by patent citations. Q J Econ 63: 577–598
Johansson M, Rauhut D (2006) ESPON Project 1.1.4. The spatial effects of demographic trends and migration. Swedish Institute for Growth Policy Studies (ITPS), Stockholm
Keeble D, Walker S (1994) New firms, small firms and dead firms: spatial patterns and determinants in the United Kingdom. Reg Stud 28: 411–427
Kim S (1999) The rise of multiunit firms in US manufacturing. Explorations Econ Hist 36(4): 360–386
Klepper S (2007) Disagreements, spinoffs, and the evolution of detroit as the capital of the U.S. automobile industry. Manage Sci 53: 616–631
Klepper S, Thompson P (2007) Spinoff entry in high-tech industries: motives and consequences. In: Malerba F, Brussoni S (eds) Economic perspectives on innovation. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, pp 187–218
Krugman P (1991) Geography and trade. MIT Press, Cambridge
Markusen A (1996) Sticky places in slippery space: a typology of industrial districts. Econ Geogr 72: 293–313
Marshall A (1920) Principles of economics, 8th edn. MacMillan, London
Michelacci C, Silva O (2007) Why so many local entrepreneurs? Rev Econ Stat 89: 615–633
Nelson R, Winter S (1982) An evolutionary theory of economic change. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Ono Y (2003) Outsourcing business services and the role of central administrative offices. J Urban Econ 53: 377–395
Piore M, Sabel C (1984) The second industrial divide. Possibilities for prosperity. Basic Books Inc, New York
Porter M (1990) The competitive advantage of nations. McMillan, London
Rosenthal SS, Strange WC (2003) Geography, industrial organization, and agglomeration. Rev Econ Stat 85(2): 377–393
Sabel C (2002) Diversity, not specialization: the ties that bind the (new) industrial district. In: Curzio A, Fortis M (eds) Complexity and industrial clusters: dynamics and models in theory and practice. Physica, New York, pp 107–122
Saxenian A (1994) Regional advantage: culture and competition in silicon valley and Rte, vol 128. Harvard University Press, Cambridge
Saxenian A (1999) Silicon valley’s new immigrant entrepreneurs. Public Policy Institute of California, San Francisco
Schmalensee R (1977) Using the H-index of concentration with published data. Rev Econ Stat 59: 186–193
Stam E (2007) Why butterflies don’t leave. Locational behavior of entrepreneurial firms. Econ Geogr 83: 27–50
Stuart TE, Sorenson O (2005) Social networks and entrepreneurship. In: Alvarez S, Agarwal R, Sorenson O (eds) The handbook of entrepreneurship: disciplinary perspectives. Springer, Berlin, pp 211–228
Venohr B, Meyer KE (2007) The German miracle keeps running: how Germany’s hidden champions stay ahead in the global economy. Working Paper 30, FHW Berlin
Ward JH (1963) Hierarchical grouping to optimize an objective function. J Am Stat Assoc 58: 236–244
Winkelmann R (2008) Econometric analysis of count data. Springer, Berlin
Womack J, Jones D, Roos D (1990) The machine that changed the world: the story of lean production. Rawson and Associates, New York
Acknowledgments
We are indebted to the editor of the special issue, Andreas Stephan, two anonymous referees, and the participants of the summer meeting 2007 of the German speaking section of the Regional Science Association (GfR) for helpful comments on earlier versions of this paper.
Open Access
This article is distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
Open Access This is an open access article distributed under the terms of the Creative Commons Attribution Noncommercial License (https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/2.0), which permits any noncommercial use, distribution, and reproduction in any medium, provided the original author(s) and source are credited.
About this article
Cite this article
Audretsch, D., Falck, O. & Heblich, S. Who’s got the aces up his sleeve? Functional specialization of cities and entrepreneurship. Ann Reg Sci 46, 621–636 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0353-0
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-009-0353-0