Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Impacts of self-selection and transit proximity on commute mode choice: evidence from Taipei rapid transit system

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Debate over how land use and self-selection affect travel behavior continues. Prior research contributes limited empirical evidence to this debate, and characterizing self-selection remains problematic. This empirical research explores the impacts of self-selection and proximity to transit at both residence and workplace. The research hypothesis is self-selection and proximity to transit increase the probability of workers commuting by rapid rail transit. To conduct this research, a station-exit passenger survey was conducted along the Taipei Rapid Transit System. Analysis methods include binomial logit modeling and sensitivity analysis. Research results support the idea that transit proximity to both work and residence increase the probability of transit commuting, but the hypothesis about the impact of self-selection is only partly supported. Policy implications suggest that, on one hand, increasing density around transit stations could realize unfulfilled self-selection; on the other hand, improved quality-of-life characteristics in neighborhoods around station areas may induce residents and companies to relocate to the neighborhood, thereby increasing residents’ and workers’ probabilities of commuting by transit.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Alonso W (1964) Location and land use. Harvard University Press, Cambridge

    Google Scholar 

  • Bagley MN, Mokhtarian PL (2002) The impact of residential neighborhood type on travel behavior: a structural equations modeling approach. Ann Reg Sci 36: 279–297

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Boarnet MN, Crane R (2001) Travel by design: the influence of urban form on travel. Oxford University Press, New York

    Google Scholar 

  • Cao X-Y, Handy S, Mokhtarian PL (2006) The influences of the built environment and residential self-selection on pedestrian behavior: evidence from Austin, TX. Transportation 33: 1–20

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (1996) California’s transit village movement. J Public Transport 1(1): 103–130

    Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R (2007) Transit-oriented development’s ridership bonus: a product of self-selection and public policies. Environ Plan A 39: 2068–2085

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cervero R, Duncan M (2002) Residential self selection and rail commuting: a nested logit analysis. UCTC Working Paper, Berkeley: http://www.uctc.net/papers/604.pdf

  • Clark WAV, Deurloo MC, Dieleman FM (2006) Residential mobility and neighborhood outcomes. Housing Stud. 21: 323–342

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Crane R (2000) The influence of urban form on travel: an interpretative review. J Plan Lit 15(1): 3–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ewing R, Cervero R (2001) Travel and the built environment—synthesis. Transport Res Rec 1780: 87–114

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Executive Yuan of Taiwan Government (2005) Urban and regional development statistics. http://www.cepd.gov.tw/upload/URBA/Statistic/Urds/94URDS@47546.47266827328@.pdf

  • Giuliano G (1995) The weakening transportation-land use connection. Transport Res Rec 1466:63–70; (Access, 6:3–11)

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy S, Cao X-Y, Mokhtarian PL (2005) Correlation or causality between the built environment and travel behavior? Evidence from Northern California. Transport Res D, 10, pp 427–444.

    Google Scholar 

  • Handy S, Cao X-Y, Mokhtarian PL (2006) Self-selection in the relationship between built environment and walking: Evidence from Northern California. J Am Plan Assoc 72(1): 55–74

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Jarvis H (2003) Dispelling the myth that preference makes practice in residential location and transport behaviour. Housing Stud 18(4): 587–606

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kaohsiung City Government (2006) http://www.krtco.com.tw

  • Krizek KJ (2003a) Residential relocation and changes in urban travel: does neighborhood-scale urban form matter. J Am Plan Assoc 69(3): 265–281

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Krizek KJ (2003b) The complex role of urban design and theoretical models of physical activity. Prog Plan Mag Plann Netw 157: 28–29

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine J (2005) Zoned out: regulation, markets, and transportation-land use choice. RFF Press, Washington DC

    Google Scholar 

  • Levine J, Inam A, Torng G-W (2005) A choice-based rationale for land use and transportation alternatives: evidence form Boston and Atlanta. J Plan Educ Res (24): 317–330

  • McFadden DL (1978) Modelling the choice of residential location. In: Karlqvist A, Lundqvist L, Snickars F, Weibull J(eds) Spatial interaction theory and planning models. North-Holland, Amsterdam, pp 75–96

    Google Scholar 

  • McFadden DL (2001) Economic choices. Am Econ Rev 91(3): 351–378

    Google Scholar 

  • Mokhtarian PL, Cao X (2008) Examining the impacts of residential self-selection on travel behavior: a focus on methodologies. Transport Res B 42: 204–228

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T, Mokhtarian PL (2004) The extent and determinants of dissonance between actual and preferred residential neighborhood type. Environ Plan B 31: 759–784

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T, Mokhtarian PL (2007) Attitudes toward travel and land use and choice of residential neighborhood type: evidence from the San Francisco Bay area. Housing Policy Debate 18: 171–207

    Google Scholar 

  • Svenson O (1992) Differentiation and consolidation theory of human decision making: a frame of reference for the study of pre- and post-decision consolidation. Acta Psychologica 80: 143–168

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Salomon I, Ben-Akiva M (1983) The use of the life-style concept in travel demand models. Environ Plann A 15: 623–638

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T, Mokhtarian PL (2005a) What affects commute mode choice: neighborhood physical structure or preferences toward neighborhoods. J Transport Geogr 13: 83–99

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Schwanen T, Mokhtarian PL (2005b) What if you live in the wrong neighborhood? The impact of residential neighborhood type dissonance on distance traveled. Transport Res D 10: 127–151

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Scheiner J, Kasper B (2003) Lifestyles, choice of housing location and daily mobility: The lifestyle approach in the context of spatial mobility and planning. Int Soc Sci J 55: 319–322

    Google Scholar 

  • Taipei City Government (2004) Monthly statistical report of transportation, Taipei City. http://www.dot.taipei.gov.tw/ch/

  • Taipei County Government (2004) http://www.ris.tpc.gov.tw/p9/person_hose.cfm

  • Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation (2008) General information on Taipei Rapid Rail Transit systems. http://www.trtc.com.tw/c/future.asp

  • Taipei Rapid Transit Corporation (2006) Yearly report of Taipei Rapid Rail Transit systems.—2006 http://www.trtc.com.tw/img/all/A61/report2006.pdf

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2006a) WPP2004 annual population indicators. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WPP2004/WPP2004_SUP_F2_Annual_Population_Indicators.zip

  • United Nations, Department of Economic and Social Affairs (2006b) WPP2004 annual population. http://www.un.org/esa/population/publications/WPP2004/WPP2004_SUP_F3_Annual_Population_Indicators_Percentage.zip

  • Waddell P (1993) Exogenous workplace choice in residential location models: is the assumption valid?. Geogr Anal 25: 65–75

    Google Scholar 

  • Weisbrod GE, Lerman SR, Ben-Akiva M (1980) Tradeoffs in residential location decisions: transportation versus other factors. Transport Policy Decis Mak 1: 13–26

    Google Scholar 

  • Wikipedia (2006) List of selected cities by population density. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_selected_cities_by_population_density

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Yu-Hsin Tsai.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Tsai, YH. Impacts of self-selection and transit proximity on commute mode choice: evidence from Taipei rapid transit system. Ann Reg Sci 43, 1073–1094 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0233-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0233-z

JEL Classification

Navigation