Skip to main content
Log in

The normalized revealed comparative advantage index

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

In this paper, we propose the normalized revealed comparative advantage (NRCA) index as an alternative measure of comparative advantage. The NRCA index is demonstrated capable of revealing the extent of comparative advantage that a country has in a commodity more precisely and consistently than other alternative RCA indices in the literature. As a result, the NRCA index is comparable across commodity, country, and time. Therefore, the NRCA index provides a useful tool for quantitative regional research, especially for studies on regional comparative advantage.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Balassa B (1965) Trade liberalisation and revealed comparative advantage. Manch Sch Econ Soc Sci 33: 99–123

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballance R, Forstner H, Murray T (1985) On measuring revealed comparative advantage: a note on Bowen’s indices. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 121: 346–350

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Ballance R, Forstner H, Murray T (1986) More on measuring comparative advantage: a reply. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 122: 375–378

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Benedictis LD, Tamberi M (2001) A note on the Balassa index of revealed comparative advantage. Working Papers #158, Dipartimento di Economia, Universita’ Politecnica delle Marche (I), doi:10.2139/ssrn.289602

  • Bojnec S (2001) Trade and revealed comparative advantage measures: regional and central and east European agricultural trade. Eastern Eur Econ 39: 72–98

    Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HP (1983) On the theoretical interpretation of indices of trade intensity and revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 119: 464–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HP (1985) On measuring comparative advantage: a reply and extension. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 121: 351–354

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Bowen HP (1986) On measuring comparative advantage: further comments. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 122: 379–381

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Cai JN, Leung PS (2007) Toward a more general measure of revealed comparative advantage variation. Appl Econ Lett 1–4. doi:10.1080/13504850600748992

  • Cai JN, Leung PS, Loke M (2007) Comparative advantage of selected agricultural products in Hawaii: a revealed comparative advantage assessment. Economic Issues EI-11, College of Tropical Agriculture and Human Resources, University of Hawaii at Manoa

  • Dalum B, Laursen K, Villumsen G (1998) Structural change in OECD export specialisation patterns: de-specialisation and stickiness. Int Rev Appl Econ 12: 447–467

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Deardorff A (1994) Exploring the limits of comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Archiv 130: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Havrila I, Gunawardana P (2003) Analyzing comparative advantage and competitiveness: an application to Australia’s textile and clothing industries. Aust Econ Pap 42: 103–117

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hiley M (1999) The dynamics of changing comparative advantage in the Asia-Pacific region. J Asia Pac Econ 4: 446–476

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hillman AL (1980) Observations on the relation between “revealed comparative advantage” and comparative advantage as indicated by pre-trade relative prices. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 116: 315–321

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hoen AR, Oosterhaven J (2006) On the measurement of comparative advantage. Ann Reg Sci 40: 677–691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kunimoto K (1977) Typology of trade intensity indexes. Hitotsubashi J Econ 17: 15–32

    Google Scholar 

  • Laursen K (1998) Revealed comparative advantage and the alternatives as measures of international specialisation. DRUID Working Paper 98–30

  • Leamer E, Stern RM (1970) Quantitative international economics. Allyn and Bacon, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Mack E, Grubesic TH, Kessler E (2007) Indices of industrial diversity and regional economic composition. Growth Change 38: 474–509

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan G, Schmidt C (2005) A note on localization and specialization. Growth Change 36: 565–576

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Proudman J, Redding S (1998) Openness and growth. The Bank of England, UK

  • Thongdee K, Kunnatee K (2003) Comparative advantage and competitive strength of Thai canned tuna export in the world market: 1982–1998. ABAC J 23: 19–33

    Google Scholar 

  • Vollrath TL (1991) A theoretical evaluation of alternative trade intensity measures of revealed comparative advantage. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 127: 265–280

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yeats AJ (1985) On the appropriate interpretation of the revealed comparative advantage index: implications of a methodology based on industry sector analysis. Weltwirtschaftliches Arch 121: 61–73

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Run Yu.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Yu, R., Cai, J. & Leung, P. The normalized revealed comparative advantage index. Ann Reg Sci 43, 267–282 (2009). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-008-0213-3

JEL Classification

Navigation