Abstract
Most cluster-based economic development programs use co-location to initially identify the spatial footprint of cluster areas. Geographic proximity (co- location) is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for potential clustering activity. Therefore, an assessment of industry location and density patterns becomes the first phase in the identification of potential cluster regions to be included in a cluster driven development policy. This paper compares the use of location quotients and Getis–Ord G i * in the identification of potential cluster regions in the transportation equipment industry of four states in the Midwestern USA. Also, both location quotients and G i * are used to classify counties with respect to their concentration of transportation equipment manufacturing.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Akoorie M (2000). Organizational clusters in a resource-based industry: empirical evidence from New Zealand. In: Green, MB and McNaughton, RB (eds) Industrial networks and proximity, pp 133–164. Ashgate, Burlington
Akundi K (2003) Cluster-based economic development, part 1: a survey of state initiatives. Texas Economic Development, Business and Industry Data Center. http://www.bidc.state.tx.us/Cluster%20Based%20EconDev%20PART1.pdf
Blair J (1995). Local economic development; analysis and practice. Sage, London
Ertur C and Koch W (2006). Regional disparities in the European Union and the enlargement process: an exploratory spatial data analysis, 1995–2000. Ann Reg Sci 40: 723–765
ESRI (2005) Spatial statistics for commercial applications, an ESRI white paper. http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/spatial-stats-comm-apps.pdf
Fang F (2006). Quantitative methods and applications in GIS. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton
Feldman MP and Francis JL (2004). Homegrown solutions: fostering cluster formation. Econ Dev Q 18(2): 127–137
Feser E and Bergman E (2000). National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Reg Stud 34: 1–19
Feser E, Isserman A (2005) Clusters and rural economies. http://www.urban.uiuc.edu/faculty/feser/Pubs/Clusters_and_rural_economies.pdf
Feser E and Sweeney S (2002). Theory, methods and a cross-metropolitan of comparison of business clusters. In: McCann, P (eds) Industrial location economics, pp 222–257. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham
Feser E, Sweeney S and Renski H (2005). A descriptive analysis of discrete US industrial complexes. J Reg Sci 45: 395–419
Getis A and Aldstadt J (2004). Constructing the spatial weights matrix: using a local statistic. Geogr Anal 36: 90–104
Gordon I and McCann P (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks. Urban Stud 37: 513–532
Helsel J, Kim H and Lee J (2007). An evolutional model of US manufacturing and services industries. In: Gatrell, J and Reid, N (eds) Enterprising worlds, pp 83–98. Springer, Dordrecht
Hendry C and Brown J (2006). Dynamics of clustering and performance in the UK opto-electronics industry. Reg Stud 7: 707–725
Henry N and Pinch S (2001). Neo-marshallian nodes, institutional thickness and Britain’s ‘motor sport valley’: thick or thin. Environ Plan A 33: 1169–1183
Hill E and Brennan J (2000). A Methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Econ Dev Q 14: 65–96
Kennedy L. (1999). Cooperating for survival: tannery pollution and joint action in the Palar Valley (India). World Dev 27(9): 1673–1691
Kenney M and Florida R (1992). The Japanese transplants: production, organization and regional development. J Am Plan Assoc 58: 21–38
Klier T (2005). Determinants of supplier plant location: evidence from the auto industry. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 29: 2–14
Klier T, McMillen D (2005) Clustering of auto supplier plants in the US: GMM spatial logit for large samples, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives. http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/workingpapers/wp2005_18.pdf
Litzenberger T and Sternber R (2005). Regional clusters and entrpeneurial activities: empirical evidence from German regions. In: Karlsson, C, Johannson, B and Stough, R (eds) Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks, pp 260–302. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Martin R and Sunley P (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea. J Econ Geogr 3: 5–35
May W, Mason C and Pinch S (2001). Explaining industrial agglomeration: The case of the British high-fidelity industry. Geoforum 32: 363–376
Miller P, Botham R, Martin R and Moore B (2001). Business clusters in the UK: a first assessment. Department of Trade and Industry, London
Mitchell A (2005). The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, volume 2: spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI Press, Redlands
Mulligan G and Schmidt C (2005). A note on localization and specialization. Growth Change 36: 565–590
Nadvi K (1999). Collective efficiency and collective failure: the response of the Sialkot surgical instrument cluster to global quality pressures. World Dev 27(9): 1605–1626
Porter M (1998). On competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston
Porter M (2000). Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Q 14: 15–34
Reid N and Carroll MC (2006). Collaborating to compete: the case of the Northwest Ohio greenhouse cluster. In: Gattrel, J and Reid, N (eds) Enterprising worlds, pp 41–56. Springer, Dordrecht
Roberts B and Stimson R (1998). Multi-sectoral qualitative analysis: A tool for assessing the competitiveness of regions and formulating strategies for economic development. Ann Reg Sci 32: 469–494
Rubenstein J (1988). Changing distribution of American motor-vehicle-parts suppliers. Geogr Rev 78: 288–98
SANDAG (2001) San Diego regional employment clusters: engines of the modern economy. SANDAG Info, No. 1, 1–31
Schmitz H and Nadvi K (1999). Clustering and industrialization: introduction.. World Dev 27(9): 1503–1514
Solvell O, Lindqvist G and Ketels C (2003). The cluster initiative greenbook. Ivory Tower AB, Stockholm
Stimson R, Stough R and Roberts B (2006). Regional economic development; analysis and planning strategy, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin
Tully J and Berkeley N (2004). Visualising the operating behavior of SMEs in sector and cluster: evidence from the West Midlands. Local Econ 19: 38–54
Unwin A and Unwin D (1998). Exploratory spatial data analysis with local statistics. Statistician 47: 415–421
US Census Bureau (2002) County business patterns, 2002. http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html
US Census Bureau (2002) Economic census, 2002. http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/
Wong D and Lee J (2005). Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS. Wiley, Hoboken
Woodward D (1992). Locatonal determinants of Japanese manufacturing startups in the United States. South Econ J 58: 690–708
Yang G and Stough R (2005). A preliminary analysis of functional and spatial clustering: the case of the Baltimore metropolitan region. In: Karlsson, C, Johannson, B and Stough, R (eds) Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks, pp 303–320. Edward Elgar, Northampton
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Additional information
This research is funded by US Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration grant #06-66-05054-01.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Carroll, M.C., Reid, N. & Smith, B.W. Location quotients versus spatial autocorrelation in identifying potential cluster regions. Ann Reg Sci 42, 449–463 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0163-1
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0163-1