Skip to main content
Log in

Location quotients versus spatial autocorrelation in identifying potential cluster regions

  • Original Paper
  • Published:
The Annals of Regional Science Aims and scope Submit manuscript

Abstract

Most cluster-based economic development programs use co-location to initially identify the spatial footprint of cluster areas. Geographic proximity (co- location) is a necessary, but not a sufficient, condition for potential clustering activity. Therefore, an assessment of industry location and density patterns becomes the first phase in the identification of potential cluster regions to be included in a cluster driven development policy. This paper compares the use of location quotients and Getis–Ord G i * in the identification of potential cluster regions in the transportation equipment industry of four states in the Midwestern USA. Also, both location quotients and G i * are used to classify counties with respect to their concentration of transportation equipment manufacturing.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  • Akoorie M (2000). Organizational clusters in a resource-based industry: empirical evidence from New Zealand. In: Green, MB and McNaughton, RB (eds) Industrial networks and proximity, pp 133–164. Ashgate, Burlington

    Google Scholar 

  • Akundi K (2003) Cluster-based economic development, part 1: a survey of state initiatives. Texas Economic Development, Business and Industry Data Center. http://www.bidc.state.tx.us/Cluster%20Based%20EconDev%20PART1.pdf

  • Blair J (1995). Local economic development; analysis and practice. Sage, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Ertur C and Koch W (2006). Regional disparities in the European Union and the enlargement process: an exploratory spatial data analysis, 1995–2000. Ann Reg Sci 40: 723–765

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • ESRI (2005) Spatial statistics for commercial applications, an ESRI white paper. http://www.esri.com/library/whitepapers/pdfs/spatial-stats-comm-apps.pdf

  • Fang F (2006). Quantitative methods and applications in GIS. Taylor & Francis, Boca Raton

    Google Scholar 

  • Feldman MP and Francis JL (2004). Homegrown solutions: fostering cluster formation. Econ Dev Q 18(2): 127–137

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser E and Bergman E (2000). National industry cluster templates: a framework for applied regional cluster analysis. Reg Stud 34: 1–19

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Feser E, Isserman A (2005) Clusters and rural economies. http://www.urban.uiuc.edu/faculty/feser/Pubs/Clusters_and_rural_economies.pdf

  • Feser E and Sweeney S (2002). Theory, methods and a cross-metropolitan of comparison of business clusters. In: McCann, P (eds) Industrial location economics, pp 222–257. Edward Elgar, Cheltenham

    Google Scholar 

  • Feser E, Sweeney S and Renski H (2005). A descriptive analysis of discrete US industrial complexes. J Reg Sci 45: 395–419

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Getis A and Aldstadt J (2004). Constructing the spatial weights matrix: using a local statistic. Geogr Anal 36: 90–104

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Gordon I and McCann P (2000). Industrial clusters: complexes, agglomeration and/or social networks. Urban Stud 37: 513–532

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Helsel J, Kim H and Lee J (2007). An evolutional model of US manufacturing and services industries. In: Gatrell, J and Reid, N (eds) Enterprising worlds, pp 83–98. Springer, Dordrecht

    Google Scholar 

  • Hendry C and Brown J (2006). Dynamics of clustering and performance in the UK opto-electronics industry. Reg Stud 7: 707–725

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Henry N and Pinch S (2001). Neo-marshallian nodes, institutional thickness and Britain’s ‘motor sport valley’: thick or thin. Environ Plan A 33: 1169–1183

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Hill E and Brennan J (2000). A Methodology for identifying the drivers of industrial clusters: The foundation of regional competitive advantage. Econ Dev Q 14: 65–96

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kennedy L. (1999). Cooperating for survival: tannery pollution and joint action in the Palar Valley (India). World Dev 27(9): 1673–1691

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Kenney M and Florida R (1992). The Japanese transplants: production, organization and regional development. J Am Plan Assoc 58: 21–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Klier T (2005). Determinants of supplier plant location: evidence from the auto industry. Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives 29: 2–14

    Google Scholar 

  • Klier T, McMillen D (2005) Clustering of auto supplier plants in the US: GMM spatial logit for large samples, Federal Reserve Bank of Chicago Economic Perspectives. http://www.chicagofed.org/publications/workingpapers/wp2005_18.pdf

  • Litzenberger T and Sternber R (2005). Regional clusters and entrpeneurial activities: empirical evidence from German regions. In: Karlsson, C, Johannson, B and Stough, R (eds) Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks, pp 260–302. Edward Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

  • Martin R and Sunley P (2003). Deconstructing clusters: chaotic concept or policy panacea. J Econ Geogr 3: 5–35

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • May W, Mason C and Pinch S (2001). Explaining industrial agglomeration: The case of the British high-fidelity industry. Geoforum 32: 363–376

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Miller P, Botham R, Martin R and Moore B (2001). Business clusters in the UK: a first assessment. Department of Trade and Industry, London

    Google Scholar 

  • Mitchell A (2005). The ESRI guide to GIS analysis, volume 2: spatial measurements and statistics. ESRI Press, Redlands

    Google Scholar 

  • Mulligan G and Schmidt C (2005). A note on localization and specialization. Growth Change 36: 565–590

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Nadvi K (1999). Collective efficiency and collective failure: the response of the Sialkot surgical instrument cluster to global quality pressures. World Dev 27(9): 1605–1626

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (1998). On competition. Harvard Business School Press, Boston

    Google Scholar 

  • Porter M (2000). Location, competition and economic development: local clusters in a global economy. Econ Dev Q 14: 15–34

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Reid N and Carroll MC (2006). Collaborating to compete: the case of the Northwest Ohio greenhouse cluster. In: Gattrel, J and Reid, N (eds) Enterprising worlds, pp 41–56. Springer, Dordrecht

    Chapter  Google Scholar 

  • Roberts B and Stimson R (1998). Multi-sectoral qualitative analysis: A tool for assessing the competitiveness of regions and formulating strategies for economic development. Ann Reg Sci 32: 469–494

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Rubenstein J (1988). Changing distribution of American motor-vehicle-parts suppliers. Geogr Rev 78: 288–98

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • SANDAG (2001) San Diego regional employment clusters: engines of the modern economy. SANDAG Info, No. 1, 1–31

  • Schmitz H and Nadvi K (1999). Clustering and industrialization: introduction.. World Dev 27(9): 1503–1514

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Solvell O, Lindqvist G and Ketels C (2003). The cluster initiative greenbook. Ivory Tower AB, Stockholm

    Google Scholar 

  • Stimson R, Stough R and Roberts B (2006). Regional economic development; analysis and planning strategy, 2nd edn. Springer, Berlin

    Google Scholar 

  • Tully J and Berkeley N (2004). Visualising the operating behavior of SMEs in sector and cluster: evidence from the West Midlands. Local Econ 19: 38–54

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Unwin A and Unwin D (1998). Exploratory spatial data analysis with local statistics. Statistician 47: 415–421

    Google Scholar 

  • US Census Bureau (2002) County business patterns, 2002. http://www.census.gov/epcd/cbp/view/cbpview.html

  • US Census Bureau (2002) Economic census, 2002. http://www.census.gov/econ/census02/

  • Wong D and Lee J (2005). Statistical analysis of geographic information with ArcView GIS and ArcGIS. Wiley, Hoboken

    Google Scholar 

  • Woodward D (1992). Locatonal determinants of Japanese manufacturing startups in the United States. South Econ J 58: 690–708

    Article  Google Scholar 

  • Yang G and Stough R (2005). A preliminary analysis of functional and spatial clustering: the case of the Baltimore metropolitan region. In: Karlsson, C, Johannson, B and Stough, R (eds) Industrial clusters and inter-firm networks, pp 303–320. Edward Elgar, Northampton

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Neil Reid.

Additional information

This research is funded by US Department of Commerce, Economic Development Administration grant #06-66-05054-01.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Carroll, M.C., Reid, N. & Smith, B.W. Location quotients versus spatial autocorrelation in identifying potential cluster regions. Ann Reg Sci 42, 449–463 (2008). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0163-1

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00168-007-0163-1

JEL Classification

Navigation