Skip to main content
Log in

Which stabilization technique corrects anatomy best in patients with AC-separation? An experimental study

An experimental study

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

In ten human cadaveric shoulder specimens four different parameters were documented prior to, and after, dissecting all passive stabilizers. These included the vertical, horizontal and mediolateral acromioclavicular distance, as well as the clavicular rotation. In addition, the same parameters were documented after acromioclavicular (AC) reconstruction using eight different techniques. The results showed a good reconstruction of the vertical ac-distance. Most of the techniques, especially the coracoid-sling procedure, led to a significant anterior displacement of the clavicle in relation to the scapula. To a lesser degree, most of the conventional procedures also resulted in a lateralization of the acromion and/or clavicular rotation. A bone anchor system for distal fixation in the base of the coracoid process and a medialized hole in the clavicle restored anatomy best. This new technique therefore is recommended for anatomical AC-reconstruction.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Additional information

Received: 13 November 1998 Accepted: 20 April 1999

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Jerosch, J., Filler, T., Peuker, E. et al. Which stabilization technique corrects anatomy best in patients with AC-separation? An experimental study. Knee Surgery 7, 365–372 (1999). https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050182

Download citation

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s001670050182

Navigation