Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Accelerometer-based portable navigation, a faster guide compared to computer-assisted navigation in bilateral total knee arthroplasty—a randomized controlled study

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

There are limited studies in the literature comparing the alignment accuracy of  the large console, imageless, computer-assisted navigation (CAN) and portable, hand-held, accelerometer-based navigation (ABN) in total knee arthroplasty (TKA).  This study was aimed to compare the operative time, blood loss, radiological, clinical and functional outcomes between CAN- and ABN-guided bilateral TKA.

Methods

From Jan 2016 to Dec 2017, 50 patients who underwent bilateral TKA were randomized to undergo either CAN-guided or ABN-guided TKA. Tourniquet time and blood loss were recorded, and intra-op complications were noted. Post-op radiological outcomes at 2 weeks were compared between the groups. The clinical and functional outcomes using the American Knee Society Scores (KSS) and Oxford Knee Score (OKS) were recorded pre-operatively and post-operatively at 3, 6, 12 months and at the end of the study with a minimum follow-up of 48 months.

Results

Both groups were well-matched in terms of patient demographic parameters. The mean surgical time per knee was significantly lower in the ABN group (54.5 ± 5.6 min) compared to the CAN group (61.7 ± 13.7 min; p < 0.01). Mean blood loss per knee in the ABN group was 592.1 ± 245.3 mL compared to 682.8 ± 322.0 in the CAN group (p = 0.11). In the ABN group, the mean post-op mechanical axis was 1.2 ± 3.2° (vs 1.5 ± 2.2° in the CAN group, p 0.6), the frontal femoral angle was 88.8 ± 2.3° (vs 88.8 ± 1.8° in the CAN group, p 1.0) and frontal tibial angle was 90.1 ± 1.6° (vs 89.7 ± 1.1° in the CAN group, p 0.14). At 48 month follow-up, the mean functional KSS in the ABN group was 89.0 ± 5.7 (vs 88.1 ± 4.5 in the CAN group, p 0.37) and the mean OKS was 40.5 ± 2.8 (vs 39.6 ± 3.2 in the CAN group, p 0.12).

Conclusion

Portable, hand-held ABN offers alignment accuracy and functional outcomes in TKA similar to that with CAN, with a reduced duration of surgery. There was no advantage of either of the techniques in terms of clinical or functional outcomes at 48 month follow-up.

Level of evidence 1.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Cozzi Lepri A, Innocenti M, Matassi F, Villano M, Civinini R, Innocenti M (2019) Accelerometer-based navigation in total knee arthroplasty for the management of extra-articular deformity and retained femoral hardware: analysis of component alignment. Joints 7:1–7

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  2. Cundy W, Theodoulou A, Ling C, Krishnan J, Wilson C (2017) Blood loss in total knee arthroplasty. J Knee Surg 30:452–459

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Deep K, Shankar S, Mahendra A (2017) Computer assisted navigation in total knee and hip arthroplasty. SICOT-J 3:50

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Desseaux A, Graf P, Dubrana F, Marino R, Clavé A (2016) Radiographic outcomes in the coronal plane with iASSISTTM versus optical navigation for total knee arthroplasty: a preliminary case-control study. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 102:363–368

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Gao X, Sun Y, Chen Z-H, Dou T-X, Liang Q-W, Li X (2019) Comparison of the accelerometer-based navigation system with conventional instruments for total knee arthroplasty: a propensity score-matched analysis. J Orthop Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-019-1258-y

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  6. Gharaibeh MA, Solayar GN, Harris IA, Chen DB, MacDessi SJ (2017) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation (KneeAlign) vs conventional instrumentation for total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized comparative trial. J Arthroplasty 32:777–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Gibon E, Courpied J-P, Hamadouche M (2013) Total joint replacement and blood loss: what is the best equation? Int Orthop 37:735–739

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Goh GS-H, Liow MHL, Lim WS-R, Tay DK-J, Yeo SJ, Tan MH (2016) Accelerometer-based navigation is as accurate as optical computer navigation in restoring the joint line and mechanical axis after total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 31:92–97

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Goh GS-H, Liow MHL, Tay DK-J, Lo N-N, Yeo S-J, Tan M-H (2018) Accelerometer-based and computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty: a reduction in mechanical axis outliers does not lead to improvement in functional outcomes or quality of life when compared to conventional total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 33:379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Huang EH, Copp SN, Bugbee WD (2015) Accuracy of a handheld accelerometer-based navigation system for femoral and tibial resection in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 30:1906–1910

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Ikawa T, Takemura S, Kim M, Takaoka K, Minoda Y, Kadoya Y (2017) Usefulness of an accelerometer-based portable navigation system in total knee arthroplasty. Bone Joint J 99-B:1047–1052

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Kamara E, Berliner ZP, Hepinstall MS, Cooper HJ (2017) Pin site complications associated with computer-assisted navigation in hip and knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 32:2842–2846

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Kim Y-H, Park J-W, Kim J-S, Park S-D (2014) The relationship between the survival of total knee arthroplasty and postoperative coronal, sagittal and rotational alignment of knee prosthesis. Int Orthop 38:379–385

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Lin S-J, Lee C-Y, Huang K-C, Peng K-T, Huang T-W, Lee MS, Hsu RW-W, Shen W-J (2015) Improved femoral component rotation in advanced genu valgum deformity using computer-assisted measured resection total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Surg Res. https://doi.org/10.1186/s13018-015-0279-4

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  15. Malhotra R, Jain A, Gupta S, Gautam D (2021) Outcomes of total knee arthroplasty in patients with prior hardware: a case-control study using handheld navigation. J Knee Surg. https://doi.org/10.1055/s-0041-1726419

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Malhotra R, Singla A, Lekha C, Kumar V, Karthikeyan G, Malik V, Mridha AR (2015) A prospective randomized study to compare systemic emboli using the computer-assisted and conventional techniques of total knee arthroplasty. J Bone Jt Surg Am 97:889–894

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Mathis DT, Hirschmann MT (2021) Why do knees after total knee arthroplasty fail in different parts of the world? J Orthop 23:52–59

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. McConnell J, Dillon J, Kinninmonth A, Sarungi M, Picard F (2012) Blood loss following total knee replacement is reduced when using computer-assisted versus standard methods. Acta Orthop Belg 78:75–79

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Nam D, Weeks KD, Reinhardt KR, Nawabi DH, Cross MB, Mayman DJ (2013) Accelerometer-based, portable navigation vs imageless, large-console computer-assisted navigation in total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 28:255–261

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Peersman G, Taeymans K, Jans C, Vuylsteke P, Fennema P, Heyse T (2016) Malrotation deformities of the lower extremity and implications on total knee arthroplasty: a narrative review. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 136:1491–1498

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Petursson G, Fenstad AM, Gøthesen Ø, Dyrhovden GS, Hallan G, Röhrl SM, Aamodt A, Furnes O (2018) Computer-assisted compared with conventional total knee replacement: a multicenter parallel-group randomized controlled trial. J Bone Jt Surg Am 100:1265–1274

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Shihab Z, Clayworth C, Nara N (2020) Handheld, accelerometer-based navigation versus conventional instrumentation in total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis. ANZ J Surg 90:2068–2079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Singla A, Malhotra R, Kumar V, Lekha C, Karthikeyan G, Malik V (2015) A randomized controlled study to compare the total and hidden blood loss in computer-assisted surgery and conventional surgical technique of total knee replacement. Clin Orthop Surg 7:211

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  24. Slevin O, Hirschmann A, Schiapparelli FF, Amsler F, Huegli RW, Hirschmann MT (2018) Neutral alignment leads to higher knee society scores after total knee arthroplasty in preoperatively non-varus patients: a prospective clinical study using 3D-CT. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:1602–1609

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Ueyama H, Minoda Y, Sugama R, Ohta Y, Yamamura K, Nakamura S, Takemura S, Nakamura H (2019) An accelerometer-based portable navigation system improved prosthetic alignment after total knee arthroplasty in 3D measurements. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1580–1586

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

No funding was received from any source for this study.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

AS drafted the manuscript. RM conceived the study and performed all the surgeries. VD and VM participated in the design of the study. VM and DG performed the post-operative clinical and functional scoring. DS and AS independently measured the various radiological angles. RM shaped the final version of the manuscript. All the authors read and approved the manuscript.

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rajesh Malhotra.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All the authors have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by institute ethics committee, AIIMS, New Delhi, India and was registered under Clinical trials Registry of India (CTRI). All the procedures performed in the study involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the Institutional and/or the National Research Committee and with 1964 Helsinki Declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Informed consent

Informed and written consent was taken from all the patients who had participated in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Swamy, A.M., Malhotra, R., Digge, V. et al. Accelerometer-based portable navigation, a faster guide compared to computer-assisted navigation in bilateral total knee arthroplasty—a randomized controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 31, 786–792 (2023). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06842-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06842-y

Keywords

Navigation