Skip to main content
Log in

Italian version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury scale (IT ACL-RSI): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation and ability to predict the return to sport at medium-term follow-up in a population of sport patients

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The timing of psychological and physical recovery after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction represents an open issue in current orthopedic practice. Several tools have been developed to evaluate these factors, with the most recent being represented by the anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) return to sport injury scale (ACL-RSI). The aims of this study were to provide a validated Italian translation of the ACL-RSI in a population of sport patients, and to identify a possible correlation of the ACL-RSI score with the return to sport (RTS) time and the level of sport participation in comparison to the pre-injury one.

Methods

The Italian translation and cultural adaptation of the scale were completed using a using the “translation–back translation” method. A total of 130 patients were enrolled and completed the study questionnaires 6 months after ACL reconstruction. Randomly, 65 of them were re-tested for the ACL-RSI within 2 weeks. The internal consistency, reliability, feasibility, and construct validity of the Italian version of ACL-RSI were assessed and compared to Italian version of the KOOS, the Lysholm Score, the AKPS and the IKDC subjective score. Responsiveness was tested comparing patients returning to sport at 6 and 12 months. The Tegner activity scale was collected at baseline, 6 and 12 months to identify the level of activity after return to sport, in relation to the ACL-RSI score.

Results

The Italian adaptation of the ACL-RSI demonstrated excellent internal consistency (Cronbach’s alpha = 0.953), reliability (test–retest ICC = 0.916) and feasibility, with no ceiling or floor effect. Construct validity was confirmed by the moderate to strong correlation with all the other scales (p < 0.0001). Slight and non-significant higher ACL-RSI score was shown by patients returned to sport at 6 or 12 months after surgery. Nevertheless, the ACL-RSI score at 6 months was significantly different between patients who returned and those who did not returned to the same level of sport activity 12 months after the procedure.

Conclusions

This study demonstrated that the Italian ACL-RSI is a reliable tool for evaluating the psychological readiness for return to sports of athletes who underwent ACL reconstruction, especially when collected at the end of the rehabilitation process. Since the IT ACL-RSI used in this study is a faithful translation of the original English version, this finding can be generalized to other cultural contexts and languages too.

Level of evidence

Level II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Fear of re-injury in people who have returned to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. J Sci Med Sport 15:488–495

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 40:41–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Whitehead TS, Webster KE (2013) Psychological responses matter in returning to preinjury level of sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 41:1549–1558

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Baez SE, Hoch MC, Hoch JM (2020) Psychological factors are associated with return to pre-injury levels of sport and physical activity after ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:495–501

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Beaton DE, Bombardier C, Guillemin F, Ferraz MB (2000) Guidelines for the process of cross-cultural adaptation of self-report measures. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 25:3186–3191

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Bohu Y, Klouche S, Lefevre N, Webster K, Herman S (2015) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the French version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1192–1196

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Brand E, Nyland J (2009) Patient outcomes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: the influence of psychological factors. Orthopedics 32:335

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Cerciello S, Corona K, Morris BJ, Visonà E, Maccauro G, Maffulli N, Ronga M (2018) Cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian versions of the kujala, larsen, lysholm and fulkerson scores in patients with patellofemoral disorders. J Orthop Traumatol 19:18

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Chen T, Zhang P, Li Y, Webster K, Zhang J, Yao W, Yin Y, Ai C, Chen S (2017) Translation, cultural adaptation and validation of simplified Chinese version of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. PLoS ONE 12:e0183095

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Crawford SN, Waterman BR, Lubowitz JH (2013) Long-term failure of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 29:1566–1571

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Fitzpatrick R, Davey C, Buxton MJ, Jones DR (1998) Evaluating patient-based outcome measures for use in clinical trials. Health Technol Assess i:iv (1–74)

    Google Scholar 

  12. Fleiss JL (2011) Design and analysis of clinical experiments. John Wiley & Sons

  13. French DJ, France CR, Vigneau F, French JA, Evans RT (2007) Fear of movement/(re)injury in chronic pain: a psychometric assessment of the original English version of the Tampa scale for kinesiophobia (TSK). Pain 127:42–51

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Griffin LY, Agel J, Albohm MJ, Arendt EA, Dick RW, Garrett WE, Garrick JG, Hewett TE, Huston L, Ireland ML, Johnson RJ, Kibler WB, Lephart S, Lewis JL, Lindenfeld TN, Mandelbaum BR, Marchak P, Teitz CC, Wojtys EM (2000) Noncontact anterior cruciate ligament injuries: risk factors and prevention strategies. J Am Acad Orthop Surg 8:141–150

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Harput G, Tok D, Ulusoy B, Eraslan L, Yildiz TI, Turgut E, Demirci S, Duzgun I, Tunay VB, Baltaci G, Ergun N (2017) Translation and cross-cultural adaptation of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale into Turkish. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:159–164

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Hirohata K, Aizawa J, Furuya H, Mitomo S, Ohmi T, Ohji S, Ohara T, Koga H, Yagishita K, Webster KE (2020) The Japanese version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale has acceptable validity and reliability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:2519–2525

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Kujala UM, Jaakkola LH, Koskinen SK, Taimela S, Hurme M, Nelimarkka O (1993) Scoring of patellofemoral disorders. Arthroscopy 9:159–163

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Kvist J, Österberg A, Gauffin H, Tagesson S, Webster K, Ardern C (2013) Translation and measurement properties of the Swedish version of ACL-return to sports after injury questionnaire. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23:568–575

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Langford JL, Webster KE, Feller JA (2009) A prospective longitudinal study to assess psychological changes following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Br J Sports Med 43:377–381

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. McHorney CA, Tarlov AR (1995) Individual-patient monitoring in clinical practice: are available health status surveys adequate? Qual Life Res 4:293–307

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Monticone M, Capone A, Frigau L, Marongiu G, Abelli P, Mola F, Maffulli N, Foti C (2018) Development of the Italian version of the high-activity arthroplasty score (HAAS-I) following hip and knee total arthroplasty: cross-cultural adaptation, reliability, validity and sensitivity to change. J Orthop Surg Res 13:81

    Article  Google Scholar 

  22. Murphy GC, Foreman PE, Simpson CA, Molloy GN, Molloy EK (1999) The development of a locus of control measure predictive of injured athletes’ adherence to treatment. J Sci Med Sport 2:145–152

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Nicholas MK (2007) The pain self-efficacy questionnaire: taking pain into account. Eur J Pain 11:153–163

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Padua R, Bondì R, Ceccarelli E, Bondì L, Romanini E, Zanoli G, Campi S (2004) Italian version of the international knee documentation committee subjective knee form: cross-cultural adaptation and validation. Arthroscopy 20:819–823

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. Park MS, Kang KJ, Jang SJ, Lee JY, Chang SJ (2018) Evaluating test-retest reliability in patient-reported outcome measures for older people: a systematic review. Int J Nurs Stud 79:58–69

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. Podlog L, Eklund R (2007) The psychosocial aspects of a return to sport following serious injury: a review of the literature from a self-determination perspective. Psychol Sport Exerc 8:535–566

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28:88–96

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  28. Sala-Barat E, Álvarez-Díaz P, Alentorn-Geli E, Webster KE, Cugat R, Tomás-Sabado J (2020) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation, and measurement properties of the Spanish version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI-Sp) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:833–839

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Salatkaitė S, Šiupšinskas L, Gudas R (2019) Translation and cultural adaptation of Lithuanian version of the anterior cruciate ligament return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. PLoS ONE 14:e0219593

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Silva LO, Mendes LMR, de Lima PO, P, Almeida GPL, (2018) Translation, cross-adaptation and measurement properties of the Brazilian version of the ACL-RSI Scale and ACL-QoL Questionnaire in patients with anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Braz J Phys Ther 22:127–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Smith AM, Scott SG, O’Fallon WM, Young ML (1990) Emotional responses of athletes to injury. Mayo Clin Proc 65:38–50

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  32. Smith F, Rosenlund E, Aune A, MacLean J, Hillis S (2004) Subjective functional assessments and the return to competitive sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Br J Sports Med 38:279–284

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  33. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Terwee CB, Bot SDM, de Boer MR, van der Windt DAWM, Knol DL, Dekker J, Bouter LM, de Vet HCW (2007) Quality criteria were proposed for measurement properties of health status questionnaires. J Clin Epidemiol 60:34–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  35. Thomeé P, Währborg P, Börjesson M, Thomeé R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2006) A new instrument for measuring self-efficacy in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury. Scand J Med Sci Sports 16:181–187

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Tortoli E, Francini L, Giovannico G, Ramponi C (2020) Translation, cross-cultural adaptation and validation of the Italian version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury (ACL-RSI) scale. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06169-0

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Webster KE, Feller JA, Lambros C (2008) Development and preliminary validation of a scale to measure the psychological impact of returning to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Phys Ther Sport 9:9–15

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Webster KE, Nagelli CV, Hewett TE, Feller JA (2018) Factors associated with psychological readiness to return to sport after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 46:1545–1550

    Article  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank SIAGASCOT (The Italian Arthroscopy, Knee, Upper Limb, Sports, Cartilage and Orthopaedic Technologies Society) for coordinating the conduction of this study. The Authors also thank Rocco D’Apolito, Alessandro Russo and Laura Mangiavini for evaluating the two initial score translations.

Funding

This research was funded by Italian Ministry of Health – “Ricerca Corrente”.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Contributions

All listed Authors contributed substantially to the work by participating in the study design (GT, DC, LdG), patients’ enrollment (FF, AS, SM), data collection (GT, DC, AS, SM, LV, FF) and analysis (MV, LdG) or manuscript writing (LdG, GT, MV) and editing (DC, FF, SM, FF, LV).

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Gabriele Thiebat.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The Authors declares that there is no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

The study protocol was approved by the competent Ethics Committee of the San Raffaele Hospital (authorization number 159/int/2018, November 8, 2018).

Informed consent

An informed consent was obtained from all the participants to the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Thiebat, G., Cucchi, D., Spreafico, A. et al. Italian version of the anterior cruciate ligament-return to sport after injury scale (IT ACL-RSI): translation, cross-cultural adaptation, validation and ability to predict the return to sport at medium-term follow-up in a population of sport patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 30, 270–279 (2022). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06498-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06498-8

Keywords

Navigation