Skip to main content
Log in

ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR) aims to restore knee function and stability, allowing patients to return to the activities they enjoy and minimize further injury to the meniscus and cartilage and their ultimate progression to osteoarthritis. This study aims to present the evolution of graft choice over the last three decades according to members of the ACL Study Group (SG).

Methods

Prior to the January 2020 ACL SG biannual meeting, a survey was administered consisting of 87 questions and 16 categories, including ACLR graft choice. A similar questionnaire has been administered prior to each meeting and survey results from the past 14 meetings (1992 through 2020, excluding 1994) are included in this work. Survey responses are reported as frequencies in percentages to quantify changes in practice over the surgery period.

Results

In 1992, the most frequent graft choice for primary ACLR was bone-patellar tendon-bone (BTB) autograft, at nearly 90%. Hamstring tendon (HT) autografts have increased in popularity, currently over 50%, followed by just under 40% BTB autograft. Recently, quadriceps tendon (QT) autograft has increased in popularity since 2014.

Conclusion

Autograft (HT, BTB, QT) is an overwhelming favorite for primary ACLR over allograft. The preference for HT autograft increased over the study period relative to BTB autograft, with QT autograft gaining in popularity in recent years. Graft selection should be individualized for each patient and understanding the global trends in graft choice can help orthopaedic surgeons discuss graft options with their patients and determine the appropriate graft for each case.

Level of evidence

Level V, Expert Opinion.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abe S, Kurosaka M, Iguchi T, Yoshiya S, Hirohata K (1993) Light and electron microscopic study of remodeling and maturation process in autogenous graft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 9:394–405

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aglietti P, Buzzi R, Pisaneschi A, Strobe F, D’Andria S (1985) Follow-up of 30 reconstructions of the anterior cruciate ligament with free patellar tendon grafts for correction of chronic laxity. Ital J Sport Traumatol 7:201–210

    Google Scholar 

  3. Anderson MJ, Browning WM, Urband CE, Kluczynski MA, Bisson LJ (2016) A systematic summary of systematic reviews on the topic of the anterior cruciate ligament. Orthop J Sports Med 4(3):2325967116634074

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Ardern CL, Taylor NF, Feller JA, Webster KE (2012) Return-to-sport outcomes at 2 to 7 years after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery. Am J Sports Med 40:41–48

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Ardern CL, Webster KE, Taylor NF, Feller JA (2011) Return to sport following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction surgery: a systematic review and meta-analysis of the state of play. Br J Sports Med 45:596–606

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Arliani GG, Pereira VL, Leão RG, Lara PS, Ejnisman B, Cohen M (2019) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in professional soccer players by orthopedic surgeons. Rev Bras Ortop 54:703–708

    Google Scholar 

  7. Barrett AM, Craft JA, Replogle WH, Hydrick JM, Barrett GR (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a comparison of graft type based on age and tegner activity level. Am J Sports Med 39:2194–2198

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Barrett GR, Luber K, Replogle WH, Manley JL (2010) Allograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the young, active patient: Tegner activity level and failure rate. Arthroscopy 26:1593–1601

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Björnsson H, Samuelsson K, Sundemo D, Desai N, Sernert N, Rostgård-Christensen L, Karlsson J, Kartus J (2016) A randomized controlled trial with mean 16-year follow-up comparing hamstring and patellar tendon autografts in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 44:2304–2313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Borchers JR, Pedroza A, Kaeding C (2009) Activity level and graft type as risk factors for anterior cruciate ligament graft failure: a case-control study. Am J Sports Med 37:2362–2367

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Brophy RH, Schmitz L, Wright RW, Dunn WR, Parker RD, Andrish JT, McCarty EC, Spindler KP (2012) Return to play and future ACL injury risk after ACL reconstruction in soccer athletes from the Multicenter Orthopaedic Outcomes Network (MOON) group. Am J Sports Med 40:2517–2522

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  12. Cavaignac E, Coulin B, Tscholl P, Nik Mohd Fatmy N, Duthon V, Menetrey J (2017) Is quadriceps tendon autograft a better choice than hamstring autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A comparative study with a mean follow-up of 3.6 years. Am J Sports Med 45:1326–1332

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Chee MYK, Chen Y, Pearce CJ, Murphy DP, Krishna L, Hui JHP, Wang WEJ, Tai BC, Salunke AA, Chen X, Chua ZKH, Satkunanantham K (2017) Outcome of Patellar tendon versus 4-strand Hamstring tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of prospective randomized trials. Arthroscopy 33:450–463

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Ciccotti MC, Secrist E, Tjoumakaris F, Ciccotti MG, Freedman KB (2017) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction via independent tunnel drilling: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials comparing Patellar tendon and Hamstring autografts. Arthroscopy 33:1062–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Claes S, Hermie L, Verdonk R, Bellemans J, Verdonk P (2013) Is osteoarthritis an inevitable consequence of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? A meta-analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(9):1967–1976

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Claes S, Verdonk P, Forsyth R, Bellemans J (2011) The “Ligamentization” process in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: what happens to the human graft? A systematic review of the literature. Am J Sports Med 39(11):2476–2483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Clancy WG, Nelson DA, Reider B, Narechania RG (1982) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using one-third of the patellar ligament, augmented by extra-articular tendon transfers. J Bone Joint Surg 64:352–359

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Duchman KR, Lynch TS, Spindler KP (2017) Graft selection in anterior cruciate ligament surgery: who gets what and why? Clin Sports Med 36:25–33

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. van Eck CF, Illingworth KD, Fu FH (2010) Quadriceps tendon: the forgotten graft. Arthroscopy 26:441–2; author reply 442–3

  20. Ellis HB, Matheny LM, Briggs KK, Pennock AT, Steadman JR (2012) Outcomes and revision rate after bone-patellar tendon-bone allograft versus autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in patients aged 18 years or younger with closed physes. Arthroscopy 28:1819–1825

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Erickson BJ, Harris JD, Fillingham YA, Frank RM, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR, Cole BJ, Verma NN (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practice patterns by NFL and NCAA football team physicians. Arthroscopy 30:731–738

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Falconiero RP, DiStefano VJ, Cook TM (1998) Revascularization and ligamentization of autogenous anterior cruciate ligament grafts in humans. Arthroscopy 14:197–205

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Farber J, Harris JD, Kolstad K, McCulloch PC (2014) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries by major league Soccer team physicians. Orthop J Sports Med 2:232596711455989

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Gabler CM, Jacobs CA, Howard JS, Mattacola CG, Johnson DL (2015) Comparison of graft failure rate between autografts placed via an anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction technique. Am J Sports Med 44:1069–1079

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Gifstad T, Foss OA, Engebretsen L, Lind M, Forssblad M, Albrektsen G, Drogset JO (2014) Lower risk of revision with patellar tendon autografts compared with hamstring autografts: a registry study based on 45,998 primary ACL reconstructions in Scandinavia. Am J Sports Med 42:2319–2328

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Hamrin Senorski E, Sundemo D, Svantesson E, Sernert N, Kartus J-T, Karlsson J, Samuelsson K (2019) Preoperative and intraoperative predictors of long-term acceptable knee function and osteoarthritis after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an analysis based on 2 randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 35:489–499

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Herzog MM, Marshall SW, Lund JL, Pate V, Mack CD, Spang JT (2018) Trends in incidence of acl reconstruction and concomitant procedures among commercially insured individuals in the United States 2002–2014. Sports Health 10:523–531

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  28. Hulet C, Sonnery-Cottet B, Stevenson C, Samuelsson K, Laver L, Zdanowicz U, Stufkens S, Curado J, Verdonk P, Spalding T (2019) The use of allograft tendons in primary ACL reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27(6):1754–1770

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Janssen KW, Orchard JW, Driscoll TR, van Mechelen W (2012) High incidence and costs for anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions performed in Australia from 2003–2004 to 2007–2008: time for an anterior cruciate ligament register by Scandinavian model? Scand J Med Sci Sports 22:495–501

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Janssen RPA, van der Wijk J, Fiedler A, Schmidt T, Sala HAGM, Scheffler SU (2011) Remodelling of human hamstring autografts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:1299–1306

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Jones KG (1963) Reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. A technique using the central one-third of the patellar ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 45:925–932

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kaeding CC, Léger-St-Jean B, Magnussen RA (2017) Epidemiology and diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injuries. Clin Sports Med 36(1):1–8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kane PW, Wascher J, Dodson CC, Hammoud S, Cohen SB, Ciccotti MG (2016) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bone-patellar tendon-bone autograft versus allograft in skeletally mature patients aged 25 years or younger. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3627–3633

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Kim SJ, Choi CH, Kim SH, Lee SK, Lee W, Kim T, Jung M (2018) Bone–patellar tendon–bone autograft could be recommended as a superior graft to hamstring autograft for ACL reconstruction in patients with generalized joint laxity: 2 and 5-year follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:2568–2579

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Krych AJ, Jackson JD, Hoskin TL, Dahm DL (2008) A meta-analysis of patellar tendon autograft versus patellar tendon allograft in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 24:292–298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Lai CCH, Feller JA, Webster KE (2018) Fifteen-year audit of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions in the Australian football league from 1999 to 2013: return to play and subsequent ACL injury. Am J Sports Med 46:3353–3360

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Lopes TJA, Simic M, Pappas E (2016) Epidemiology of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in Brazil’s public health system. Rev Bras Med do Esporte 22:297–301

    Article  Google Scholar 

  38. Magnussen RA, Carey JL, Spindler KP (2011) Does autograft choice determine intermediate-term outcome of ACL reconstruction? Knee Surgery, Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 19:462–472

    Article  Google Scholar 

  39. Maletis GB, Inacio MCS, Funahashi TT (2013) Analysis of 16,192 anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions from a community-based registry. Am J Sports Med 41:2090–2098

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marshall JL, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Reider B (1979) The anterior cruciate ligament: a technique of repair and reconstruction. Clin Orthop Relat Res 143:97–106

    Google Scholar 

  41. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev CD005960

  42. Mouarbes D, Menetrey J, Marot V, Courtot L, Berard E, Cavaignac E (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review and meta-analysis of outcomes for quadriceps tendon autograft versus bone-patellar tendon–bone and hamstring-tendon autografts. Am J Sports Med 47:3531–3540

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Musahl V, Karlsson J (2019) Anterior cruciate ligament tear. N Engl J Med 380:2341–2348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Nwachukwu BU, Anthony SG, Lin KM, Wang T, Altchek DW, Allen AA (2017) Return to play and performance after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in the National Basketball Association: surgeon case series and literature review. Phys Sportsmed 45:303–308

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Nyland J, Collis P, Huffstutler A, Sachdeva S, Spears JR, Greene J, Caborn DNM (2020) Quadriceps tendon autograft ACL reconstruction has less pivot shift laxity and lower failure rates than hamstring tendon autografts. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:509–518

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Okoroha KR, Keller RA, Jung EK, Khalil L, Marshall N, Kolowich PA, Moutzouros V (2016) Pain assessment after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: bone-patellar tendon–bone versus hamstring tendon autograft. Orthop J Sports Med 4(12):2325967116674924

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  47. Pallis M, Svoboda SJ, Cameron KL, Owens BD (2012) Survival comparison of allograft and autograft anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction at the United States military academy. Am J Sports Med 40:1242–1246

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Paulos L, Noyes FR, Grood E, Butler DL (1981) Knee rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and repair. Am J Sports Med 9:140–149

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Pauzenberger L, Syré S, Schurz M (2013) “Ligamentization” in hamstring tendon grafts after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review of the literature and a glimpse into the future. Arthroscopy 29(10):1712–1721

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Roe J, Pinczewski LA, Russell VJ, Salmon LJ, Kawamata T, Chew M (2005) A 7-year follow-up of patellar tendon and hamstring tendon grafts for arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: differences and similarities. Am J Sports Med 33:1337–1345

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rougraff B, Shelbourne KD, Gerth PK, Warner J (1993) Arthroscopic and histologic analysis of human patellar tendon autografts used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 21:277–284

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Runer A, Wierer G, Herbst E, Hepperger C, Herbort M, Gföller P, Hoser C, Fink C (2018) There is no difference between quadriceps- and hamstring tendon autografts in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 2-year patient-reported outcome study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26:605–614

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Sajovic M, Stropnik D, Skaza K (2018) Long-term comparison of semitendinosus and gracilis tendon versus patellar tendon autografts for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a 17-year follow-up of a randomized controlled trial. Am J Sports Med 46:1800–1808

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Samuelsen BT, Webster KE, Johnson NR, Hewett TE, Krych AJ (2017) Hamstring autograft versus patellar tendon autograft for ACL reconstruction: is there a difference in graft failure rate? a meta-analysis of 47,613 patients. Clin Orthop Relat Res 475:2459–2468

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  55. Samuelsson K, Andersson D, Karlsson J (2009) Treatment of anterior cruciate ligament injuries with special reference to graft type and surgical technique: an assessment of randomized controlled trials. Arthroscopy 25(10):1139–1174

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Sánchez M, Anitua E, Azofra J, Prado R, Muruzabal F, Andia I (2010) Ligamentization of tendon grafts treated with an endogenous preparation rich in growth factors: gross morphology and histology. Arthroscopy 26:470–480

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sanders TL, Maradit Kremers H, Bryan AJ, Larson DR, Dahm DL, Levy BA, Stuart MJ, Krych AJ (2016) Incidence of anterior cruciate ligament tears and reconstruction: A 21-year population-based study. Am J Sports Med 44:1502–1507

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Shah AA, McCulloch PC, Lowe WR (2010) Failure rate of achilles tendon allograft in primary anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 26:667–674

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  59. Shah VM, Andrews JR, Fleisig GS, McMichael CS, Lemak LJ (2010) Return to play after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in national football league athletes. Am J Sports Med 38:2233–2239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  60. Slone HS, Romine SE, Premkumar A, Xerogeanes JW (2015) Quadriceps tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comprehensive review of current literature and systematic review of clinical results. Arthroscopy 31(3):541–554

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  61. Tan SHS, Lau BPH, Krishna L (2019) Outcomes of Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in females using patellar-tendon-bone versus hamstring autografts: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Knee Surg 32:770–787

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tisherman R, Wilson K, Horvath A, Byrne K, De Groot J, Musahl V (2019) Allograft for knee ligament surgery: an American perspective. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1882–1890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  63. Weitz FK, Sillanpää PJ, Mattila VM (2020) The incidence of paediatric ACL injury is increasing in Finland. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28:363–368

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  64. Zbrojkiewicz D, Vertullo C, Grayson JE (2018) Increasing rates of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young Australians, 2000–2015. Med J Aust 208:354–358

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Seth L. Sherman.

Ethics declarations

Conflicts of interest

Dr. Markus P. Arnold has no disclosures to report. Dr. Jacob G. Calcei has no disclosures to report. Ms. Nicole Vogel has no disclosures to report. Dr. Robert Magnussen has no disclosures to report. Dr. Mark Clatworthy reports fellowship funding from Arthrex and Johnson and Johnson, royalties from Arthrex, and paid consultant for Johnson and Johnson. Dr. Tim Spalding reports royalties from ConMed, advisory board consultant with Episurf, and speaker fees from ConMed and Smith and Nephew. Dr. John D. Campbell has no disclosures to report. Dr. John A. Bergfeld has no disclosures to report. Dr. Seth L. Sherman reports paid consultant for Arthrex, Bioventus, ConMed, Joint Restoration Foundation, Smith and Nephew, and Vericel, royalties from ConMed, advisory board for EPIC BIO, Joint Restoration Foundation, and Vericel, and stock/stock options from Vivorte.

Ethical approval

This article does not contain any studies with human participants or animals performed by any of the authors.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Arnold, M.P., Calcei, J.G., Vogel, N. et al. ACL Study Group survey reveals the evolution of anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction graft choice over the past three decades. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 3871–3876 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06443-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-021-06443-9

Navigation