Skip to main content
Log in

Feedback improves the scapular-focused treatment effects in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome

  • SHOULDER
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

An Editorial Expression of Concern to this article was published on 27 June 2023

This article has been updated

Abstract

Purpose

This study aimed to evaluate the effects of scapular-focused treatment with (SFTF) and without (SFT) feedback on pain, function, and scapular kinematics in patients with Shoulder Impingement Syndrome (SIS).

Methods

Seventy-five males and females with SIS were randomly assigned into SFTF (n = 25), SFT (n = 25) and control (n = 25) groups. The primary outcome was pain, assessed by Visual Analog Scale (VAS). The secondary outcomes were function and scapular kinematics, assessed by DASH Questionnaire and a 3-D motion capture, respectively. All outcomes were measured at the baseline and after the 8-week interventions.

Results

A post hoc analysis performed to show significant differences between groups after the 8-week interventions. For pain, there were significant differences between SFTF vs. SFT (ES (95% CI) = − 0.3(− 0.4 to − 0.1); P = 0.04), SFTF vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 1.3(0.7–1.9); P = 0.01). For DASH, also, there were significant differences between SFTF vs. SFT (ES (95% CI) = 1.8(1.1–2.4); P = 0.03), SFTF vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 4.4(3.3–5.4); P = 0.01), and SFT vs. control (ES (95% CI) = 2.6(1.8–3.4); P = 0.01). For scapular internal rotation (the sagittal or scapular planes), scapular upward rotation, and the scapular tilt, however, there were no differences between SFTF vs. SFT.

Conclusion

Based on the study results, a rehabilitation program integrated with verbal feedbacks is effective to relieve pain, and improve function and scapular kinematics in patients with SIS. Adding feedback to an exercise therapy could clinically enhance outcomes in patients with SIS.

Level of evidence

Level II.

Trial registration

This study was prospectively registered at UMIN-CTR website, and the unique trail number is UMIN000036399.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

Change history

References

  1. Başkurt Z, Başkurt F, Gelecek N, Özkan MH (2011) The effectiveness of scapular stabilization exercise in the patients with subacromial impingement syndrome. J Back Musculoskelet Rehabil 24(3):173–179

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bijur PE, Silver W, Gallagher EJ (2001) Reliability of the visual analog scale for measurement of acute pain. Acad Emerg Med 8(12):1153–1157

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Burnetto A, Paulin E, Yamaguti W (2002) Comparação entre a escala de Borg modificada e a escala de Borg modificada análogo visual aplicadas em pacientes com dispnéia. Braz J Phys Ther 6(1):41–45

    Google Scholar 

  4. Camargo PR, Alburquerque-Sendín F, Avila MA, Haik MN, Vieira A, Salvini TF (2015) Effects of stretching and strengthening exercises, with and without manual therapy, on scapular kinematics, function, and pain in individuals with shoulder impingement: a randomized controlled trial. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 45(12):984–997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Chu Y, Akins J, Lovalekar M, Tashman S, Lephart S, Sell T (2012) Validation of a video-based motion analysis technique in 3-D dynamic scapular kinematic measurements. J Biomech 45(14):2462–2466

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Clarsen B, Bahr R, Andersson SH, Munk R, Myklebust G (2014) Reduced glenohumeral rotation, external rotation weakness and scapular dyskinesis are risk factors for shoulder injuries among elite male handball players: a prospective cohort study. Br J Sports Med 48(17):1327–1333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Desjardins-Charbonneau A, Roy J-S, Dionne CE, Frémont P, MacDermid JC, Desmeules F (2015) The efficacy of manual therapy for rotator cuff tendinopathy: a systematic review and meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 45(5):330–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Diercks R, Bron C, Dorrestijn O, Meskers C, Naber R, de Ruiter T (2014) Guideline for diagnosis and treatment of subacromial pain syndrome: a multidisciplinary review by the Dutch Orthopaedic Association. Acta Orthop 85(3):314–322

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  9. Franchignoni F, Vercelli S, Giordano A, Sartorio F, Bravini E, Ferriero G (2014) Minimal clinically important difference of the disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand outcome measure (DASH) and its shortened version (QuickDASH). J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44(1):30–39

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fu FH, Harner CD, Klein AH (1991) Shoulder impingement syndrome. A critical review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 269:162–173

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Haik MN, Alburquerque-Sendín F, Camargo PR (2014) Reliability and minimal detectable change of 3-dimensional scapular orientation in individuals with and without shoulder impingement. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 44(5):341–349

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Hawkins R, Kennedy J (1980) Impingement syndrome in athletes. Am J Sports Med 8(3):151–158

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Jobe F, Bradley J (1989) The diagnosis and nonoperative treatment of shoulder injuries in athletes. Clin Sports Med 8(3):419–438

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Junghyun Kim DS, Song C (2017) Visual feedback to improve the effects of scapular stabilization exercises on pain intensity, range of motion, strength, and disability in patients with shoulder impingement syndrom. Med Sci Tech 58:42–48

    Article  Google Scholar 

  15. Kessel L, Watson M (1977) The painful arc syndrome. Clinical classification as a guide to management. J Bone Joint Surg 59(2):166–172

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Kibler WB, Ludewig PM, McClure PW, Michener LA, Bak K, Sciascia AD (2013) Clinical implications of scapular dyskinesis in shoulder injury: the 2013 consensus statement from the ‘Scapular Summit’. Br J Sports Med 47(14):877–885

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim B, Gong W, Lee S (2010) The effect of push-up plus exercise with visual biofeedback on the activity of shoulder stabilizer muscles for winged scapula. J Phys Ther Sci 22:355–358

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Kraus SL (1988) TMJ disorders: management of the craniomandibular complex: Churchill Livingstone. New York, Churchill Livingstone 18:32–50

    Google Scholar 

  19. Lewis JS, Green A, Wright C (2005) Subacromial impingement syndrome: the role of posture and muscle imbalance. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 14(4):385–392

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. MacDermid JC, Solomon P, Prkachin K (2006) The shoulder pain and disability index demonstrates factor, construct and longitudinal validity. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 7(1):12. https://doi.org/10.1186/1471-2474-7-12

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Marques AP (2014) Manual de goniometria: Editora Manole. 35. ISBN-10: 8520438970, ISBN-13: 978-8520438978

  22. McCormack HM, David JdL, Sheather S (1988) Clinical applications of visual analogue scales: a critical review. Psychol Med 18(4):1007–1019

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Michener LA, Walsworth MK, Doukas WC, Murphy KP (2009) Reliability and diagnostic accuracy of 5 physical examination tests and combination of tests for subacromial impingement. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 90(11):1898–1903

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Myers JB, Oyama S, Hibberd EE (2013) Scapular dysfunction in high school baseball players sustaining throwing-related upper extremity injury: a prospective study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 22(9):1154–1159

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Paine RM, Voight M (1993) The role of the scapula. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 18(1):386–391

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Roy JS, Moffet H, Hebert LJ, Lirette R (2009) Effect of motor control and strengthening exercises on shoulder function in persons with impingement syndrome: a single-subject study design. Man Ther 14:180–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Struyf F, Nijs J, Mollekens S, Jeurissen I, Truijen S, Mottram S (2013) Scapular-focused treatment in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome: a randomized clinical trial. Clin Rheumatol 32(3):417

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. Sturmberg C, Marquez J, Heneghan N, Snodgrass S, van Vliet P (2013) Attentional focus of feedback and instructions in the treatment of musculoskeletal dysfunction: a systematic review. Man Ther 18(6):458–467

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Turgut E, Duzgun I, Baltaci G (2017) Effects of scapular stabilization exercise training on scapular kinematics, disability, and pain in subacromial impingement: a randomized controlled trial. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 98(10):1915–1923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Van der Windt D, Koes BW, Boeke A, Devillé W, De Jong BA, Bouter LM (1996) Shoulder disorders in general practice: prognostic indicators of outcome. Br J Gen Pract 46(410):519–523

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  31. Weon JH, Kwon OY, Cynn HS, Lee WH, Kim TH, Yi CH (2011) Real-time visual feedback can be used to activate scapular upward rotators in people with scapular winging: an experimental study. J Physiother 57(2):101–107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Wu G, Van der Helm FC, Veeger HD, Makhsous M, Van Roy P, Anglin C (2005) ISB recommendation on definitions of joint coordinate systems of various joints for the reporting of human joint motion-Part II: shoulder, elbow, wrist and hand. J Biomech 38(5):981–992

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Ludewig MP, Cook MT (2000) Alterations in shoulder kinematics and associated muscle activity in people with symptoms of shoulder impingement. Phys Ther 80(3):276–291

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to express our deepest appreciation for valuable assistance and contribution of all the participants.

Funding

This research did not receive any specific grant from funding agencies in the public, commercial, or non-profit sectors.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Amir Letafatkar.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

We confirm that there are no known conflicts of interest associated with this publication and there has been no financial support for this work that could have influenced its outcome. The researchers independently collected, analyzed, and interpreted the results and have no financial interests in the results of this study. Furthermore, dissemination of the results of this study does not constitute endorsement by the researchers or their institutional affiliations.

Ethical approval

The protocol was approved by the local ethics committee, in the Kharazmi University, Tehran, Iran.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Rights and permissions

Springer Nature or its licensor (e.g. a society or other partner) holds exclusive rights to this article under a publishing agreement with the author(s) or other rightsholder(s); author self-archiving of the accepted manuscript version of this article is solely governed by the terms of such publishing agreement and applicable law.

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Moslehi, M., Letafatkar, A. & Miri, H. Feedback improves the scapular-focused treatment effects in patients with shoulder impingement syndrome. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 2281–2288 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06178-z

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06178-z

Keywords

Navigation