Skip to main content

Advertisement

Log in

Successful return to sport in patients with symptomatic borderline dysplasia following hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication

  • HIP
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

This study aims to evaluate the return to sport and correlations of patients with symptomatic borderline hip dysplasia (BHD) after hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication at a minimum follow-up of 24 months.

Methods

Twenty-five patients who underwent hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication for symptomatic BHD were included in the study. All the patients were evaluated clinically prior to surgery (T0) and at two consecutive follow-ups (T1:15 ± 1.2 months and T2: 53.9 ± 23.2 months) using the visual analogue scale (VAS) pain score, whereas sports activity was assessed by the Hip Outcome Score Sport Specific Subscale (HOS-SSS), the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) activity scale, the Tegner score and the physical component (PCS) of the Short Form-12 (SF-12). Furthermore, the presence of correlations and the possible differences between subgroups were evaluated and analysed.

Results

A significant difference was found for HOS-SSS, VAS, Tegner, UCLA and PCS with the Friedman test for repeated measures through time points (p < 0.0001). Moreover, all the scores reported significant improvement compared to the previous time point (p < 0.0001) except the HOS-SSS between T1 and T2 (n.s.). Body Mass Index (BMI) was negatively correlated with HOS-SSS at T0 (rho = − 0.526 p = 0.006) and T1 (rho = − 0.425; p = 0.034), with Tegner at each follow-up (T0: rho = − 0470 p = 0.017; T1: rho = − 0.450; p = 0.024; T2: rho = − 0.448; p = 0.024), with UCLA at T1 (rho = − 0.396 p = 0.049), with pre-operative PCS (rho = − 0.413 p = 0.0401), and positively correlated with pre-operative VAS (rho = 0.436 p = 0.0291).

Conclusions

Hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication in young patients with symptomatic BHD demonstrates a significant increase in return to sport and physical activity and low risk of complications. T-shaped capsular plication procedure may be considered in young and active patients for whom non-operative treatment failed and who have a significant limitation in sports activity; in these patterns of patients, the ideal treatment should reliably allow fast recovery in combination with very low invasiveness which will prevent osteoarthritis. The results of this study provide more accurate information regarding return to sport in patients with BHD after hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication.

Level of evidence

Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bech NH, Kodde IF, Dusseldorp F, Druyts PA, Jansen SP, Haverkamp D (2015) Hip arthroscopy in obese, a successful combination? J Hip Preserv Surg 3(1):37–42

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Chandrasekaran S, Darwish N, Martin TJ, Suarez-Ahedo C, Lodhia P, Domb BG (2017) Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral seal restoration in borderline hip dysplasia: 2-year clinical outcomes in 55 cases. Arthroscopy 33(7):1332–13340

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Cooperman D (2013) What is the evidence to support acetabular dysplasia as a cause of osteoarthritis? J Pediatr Orthop 33(Suppl 1):S2–7

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Degen RM, Mayer SW, Fields KG, Coleman SH, Kelly BT, Nawabi DH (2017) Functional outcomes and cam recurrence after arthroscopic treatment of femoroacetabular impingement in adolescents. Arthroscopy 33(7):1361–1369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Domb BG, Chaharbakhshi EO, Perets I, Yuen LC, Walsh JP, Ashberg L (2018) Hip arthroscopic surgery with labral preservation and capsular plication in patients with borderline hip dysplasia: minimum 5-year patient-reported outcomes. Am J Sports Med 46(2):305–313

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Domb BG, Lareau JM, Baydoun H, Botser I, Millis MB, Yen YM (2014) Is intraarticular pathology common in patients with hip dysplasia undergoing periacetabular osteotomy? Clin Orthop Rel Res 472:674–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Domb BG, Stake CE, Lindner D, El-Bitar Y, Jackson TJ (2013) Arthroscopic capsular plication and labral preservation in borderline hip dysplasia: two-year clinical outcomes of a surgical approach to a challenging problem. Am J Sports Med 41(11):2591–2598

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Ekhtiari S, de Sa D, Haldane CE, Simunovic N, Larson CM, Safran MR, Ayeni OR (2017) Hip arthroscopic capsulotomy techniques and capsular management strategies: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25(1):9–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  9. Evans PT, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE, Liu Y, Chaharbakhshi EO, Domb BG (2017) Arthroscopic treatment of hip pain in adolescent patients with borderline dysplasia of the hip: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 33(8):1530–1536

    Article  Google Scholar 

  10. Fredensborg N (1976) The CE angle of normal hips. Acta Orthop Scand 47:403–405

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Gupta A, Redmond JM, Hammarstedt JE, Lindner D, Stake CE, Domb BG (2015) Does obesity affect outcomes after hip arthroscopy? A cohort analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 97(1):16–23

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Hatakeyama A, Utsunomiya H, Nishikino S, Kanezaki S, Matsuda DK, Sakai A, Uchida S (2018) Predictors of poor clinical outcome after arthroscopic labral preservation, capsular plication, and cam osteoplasty in the setting of borderline hip dysplasia. Am J Sports Med 46(1):135–143

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Heller GZ, Manuguerra M, Chow R (2016) How to analyze the visual analogue scale: myths, truths and clinical relevance. Scand J Pain 13:67–75

    Article  Google Scholar 

  14. Kodraliu G, Mosconi P, Groth N, Carmosino G, Perilli A, Gianicolo EA, Rossi C, Apolone G (2001) Subjective health status assessment: evaluation of the Italian version of the SF-12 Health Survey. Results from the MiOS Project. J Epidemiol Biostat 6(3):305–316

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Kovalenko B, Bremjit P, Fernando N (2018) Classifications in brief: Tönnis classification of hip osteoarthritis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 476(8):1680–1684

    Article  Google Scholar 

  16. Leunig M, Siebenrock KA, Ganz R (2001) Rationale of periacetabular osteotomy and background work. Instr Course Lect 50:229–238

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Lim SJ, Park YS (2015) Plain radiography of the hip: a review of radiographic techniques and image features. Hip Pelvis 27(3):125–134

    Article  Google Scholar 

  18. Loder RT, Skopelja EN (2011) The epidemiology and demographics of hip dysplasia. ISRN Orthop 2011:238607

    PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  19. Maldonado DR, Perets I, Mu BH, Ortiz-Declet V, Chen AW, Lall AC, Domb BG (2018) Arthroscopic capsular plication in patients with labral tears and borderline dysplasia of the hip: analysis of risk factors for failure. Am J Sports Med 46(14):3446–3453

    Article  Google Scholar 

  20. Martin RL, Philippon MJ (2007) Evidence of validity for the hip outcome score in hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 23(8):822–826

    Article  Google Scholar 

  21. Philippon MJ (2001) The role of arthroscopic thermal capsulorrhaphy in the hip. Clin Sports Med 20(4):817–829

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Philippon MJ (2006) New frontiers in hip arthroscopy: the role of arthroscopic hip labral repair and capsulorrhaphy in the treatment of hip disorders. Instr Course Lect 55:309–516

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Saadat AA, Lall AC, Battaglia MR, Mohr MR, Maldonado DR, Domb BG (2019) Prevalence of generalized ligamentous laxity in patients undergoing hip arthroscopy: a prospective study of patients' clinical presentation, physical examination, intraoperative findings, and surgical procedures. Am J Sports Med 47(4):885–893

    Article  Google Scholar 

  24. Sperling JW, Anderson K, McCarty EC, Warren RF (2001) Complications of thermal capsulorrhaphy. Instr Course Lect 50:37–41

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  26. Uchida S, Utsunomiya H, Mori T, Taketa T, Nishikino S, Nakamura T, Sakai A (2016) Clinical and radiographic predictors for worsened clinical outcomes after hip arthroscopic labral preservation and capsular closure in developmental dysplasia of the hip. Am J Sports Med 44(1):28–38

    Article  Google Scholar 

  27. van Arkel RJ, Amis AA, Cobb JP, Jeffers JR (2015) The capsular ligaments provide more hip rotational restraint than the acetabular labrum and the ligamentum teres: an experimental study. Bone Joint J 97(4):484–491

    Article  Google Scholar 

  28. von Elm E, Altman DG, Egger M, Pocock SJ, Gøtzsche PC, Vandenbroucke JP, STROBE Initiative (2014) The Strengthening the Reporting of Observational Studies in Epidemiology (STROBE) Statement: guidelines for reporting observational studies. Int J Surg 12(12):1495–1499

    Article  Google Scholar 

  29. Wuerz TH, Song SH, Grzybowski JS, Martin HD, Mather RC 3rd, Salata MJ, Espinoza Orías AA, Nho SJ (2016) Capsulotomy size affects hip joint kinematic stability. Arthroscopy 32(8):1571–1580

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Yoon SJ, Lee SH, Jang SW, Jo S (2019) Hip arthroscopy of a painful hip with borderline dysplasia. Hip Pelvis 31(2):102–109

    Article  Google Scholar 

  31. Zahiri CA, Schmalzried TP, Szuszczewicz ES, Amstutz HC (1998) Assessing activity in joint replacement patients. J Arthroplasty 13(8):890–895

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgements

The authors thank Sarai Llamas for professional medical illustrations

Funding

This study and all authors have received no funding.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Riccardo D’Ambrosi.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

All authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.

Ethical approval

All procedures performed in studies involving human participants were in accordance with the ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committee and with the 1964 Helsinki declaration and its later amendments or comparable ethical standards.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary file1 (XLSX 44 kb)

Supplementary file2 (DOCX 91 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

D’Ambrosi, R., Hantes, M.E., Mariani, I. et al. Successful return to sport in patients with symptomatic borderline dysplasia following hip arthroscopy and T-shaped capsular plication. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 29, 1370–1377 (2021). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06147-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-020-06147-6

Keywords

Navigation