Abstract
Purpose
Glenoid bone loss contributes to recurrent instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair alone. With significant glenoid bone loss, better results have been reported after arthroscopic Bankart repair with glenoid arc reconstruction. However, no reports compare augmentation using bone graft with non-augmentation for glenoid bone loss. The purpose of this study was to assess clinical results of an arthroscopic Bankart repair with or without arthroscopic bone graft augmentation. It was hypothesized that such bone graft augmentation would restore shoulder stability, and lead to excellent outcomes.
Methods
Of 552 patients treated for anterior glenohumeral instability with arthroscopic Bankart repair, 68 met this study’s inclusion criteria of glenoid bone loss over 20% and follow-up of at least 2 years. Patients were divided into 2 groups based on whether with bone graft augmentation for glenoid bone loss [Group A: n = 35, median age; 21 years (range 13–72 years)], or not (Group B: n = 33, median age; 21 years (range 13–50 years)]. For grafting, either autologous iliac bone or artificial bone made of hydroxyapatite was used. Rowe score, recurrence rate, and return to sport were used to assess the results.
Results
Mean Rowe score was 95.0 (SD 10.6) in Group A and 69.7 (SD 27.2) in Group B (p < 0.05). The recurrence rate was 2.9% (1/36) in Group A and 48.5% (16/33) in Group B (p < 0.05). Regarding contact/collision athletes, 24 were contained in Group A and 22 in Group B. Of the patients with recurrence in Group B, 13 (59.1%) were contact/collision athletes. Finally, 50% of the contact/collision sports athletes for both groups returned to their sports at the same as pre-injury level. Of the 11 patients who returned to the same level of contact/collision sports in Group B, seven returned with residual instability. Nine athletes in Group A and 3 in Group B quit their sports for personal or social reasons.
Conclusions
Bone graft augmentation was beneficial when used with Arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Especially, for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss in contact/collision sports athletes, bone graft augmentation should be strongly considered as beneficial.
Level of evidence
Level IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
Abbreviations
- SLAP:
-
Superior labrum anterior–posterior
- 3D-CT:
-
Three-dimensional reconstructed computed tomography
- CT:
-
Computed tomography
- ABR:
-
Arthroscopic Bankart repair
References
Ahmad CS, Galano GJ, Vorys GC, Covey AS, Gardner TR, Levine WN (2009) Evaluation of glenoid capsulolabral complex insertional anatomy and restoration with single- and double-row capsulolabral repairs. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 18(6):948–954
Allain J, Goutallier D, Glorion C (1998) Long-term results of the Latarjet procedure for the treatment of anterior instability of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 80(6):841–852
Anderl W, Pauzenberger L, Laky B, Kriegleder B, Heuberer PR (2016) Arthroscopic implant-free bone grafting for shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss: clinical and radiological outcome at a minimum 2-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 44(5):1137–1145
Boileau P, Thélu CÉ, Mercier N, Ohl X, Houghton-Clemmey R, Carles M, Trojani C (2014) Arthroscopic Bristow-Latarjet combined with bankart repair restores shoulder stability in patients with glenoid bone loss. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 472(8):2413–2424
Bois AJ, Fening SD, Polster J, Jones MH, Miniaci A (2012) Quantifying glenoid bone loss in anterior shoulder instability: reliability and accuracy of 2-dimensional and 3-dimensional computed tomography measurement techniques. Am J Sports Med. 40:2569–2577
Burkhart SS, De Beer JF (2000) Traumatic glenohumeral bone defects and their relationship to failure of arthroscopic Bankart repairs: significance of the inverted-pear glenoid and the humeral engaging Hill-Sachs lesion. Arthroscopy 16(7):677–694
Calandra JJ, Baker CL, Uribe J (1989) The incidence of Hill-Sachs lesions in initial anterior shoulder dislocations. Arthroscopy 5(4):254–257
Dumont GD, Fogerty S, Rosso C, Lafosse L (2014) The arthroscopic Latarjet procedure for anterior shoulder instability: 5-year minimum follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 42(11):2560–2566
Griesser MJ, Harris JD, McCoy BW, Hussain WM, Jones MH, Bishop JY, Miniaci A (2013) Complications and re-operations after Bristow-Latarjet shoulder stabilization: a systematic review. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22(2):286–292
Ilg A, Bankes MJ, Emery RJ (2001) The intra- and inter-observer reliability of the Samilson and Prieto grading system of glenohumeral arthropathy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 9:187–190
Kaito T, Mukai Y, Nishikawa M, Ando W, Yoshikawa H, Myoui A (2006) Dual hydroxylapatite composite with porous and solid parts: experimental study using canine lumbar interbody fusion model. J Biomed Master Res B Appl Biomater. 78(2):378–384
Kraus N, Amphansap T, Gerhardt C et al (2014) Arthroscopic anatomic glenoid reconstruction using an autologous iliac crest bone grafting technique. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 23(11):1700–1708
Lafosse L, Boyle S, Gutierrez-Aramberri M, Shah A, Meller R (2010) Arthroscopic Latarjet procedure. Orthop Clin N Am. 41(3):393–405
Longo UG, Loppini M, Rizzello G, Ciuffreda M, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2014) Latarjet, Bristow, and Eden-Hybinette procedures for anterior shoulder dislocation: systematic review and quantitative synthesis of the literature. Arthroscopy 30(9):1184–1211
Moroder P, Plachel F, Huettner A, Ernstbrunner L, Minkus M, Boehm E, Gerhardt C, Scheibel M (2018) The effect of scapula tilt and best-fit circle placement when measuring glenoid bone loss in shoulder instability patients. Arthroscopy 34(2):398–404
Nakagawa S, Ozaki R, Take Y et al (2015) Bone fragment union and remodeling after arthroscopic bony Bankart repair for traumatic anterior shoulder instability with a glenoid defect: influence on postoperative recurrence. Am J Sports Med. 43(6):1438–1449
Nakagawa S, Mae T, Sato S, Okimura S, Kuroda M. (2017) Risk factors for the postoperative recurrence of instability after arthroscopic Bankart repair in athletes. Orthop J Sports Med. 5(9). doi: 10.1177/2325967117726494.
Privitera DM, Sinz NJ, Miller LR, Siegel EJ, Solberg MJ, Daniels SD, Higgins LD (2018) Clinical outcomes following the Latarjet procedure in contact and collision athletes. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 100(6):459–465
Randelli P, Ragone V, Carminati S et al (2012) Risk factors for recurrence after Bankart repair a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(11):2129–2138
Rice SG (2008) American Academy of Pediatrics Council on Sports Medicine and Fitness. Medical conditions affecting sports participation. Pediatrics. 121(4):841–848
Samilson RL, Prieto V (1983) Dislocation arthropathy of the shoulder. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 65:456–460
Shaha JS, Cook JB, Song DL et al (2015) Redefining “critical” bone loss in shoulder instability: functional outcomes worsen with “subcritical” bone loss. Am J Sports Med. 43(7):1719–1725
Shin SJ, Ko YW, Scott J, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2016) The effect of defect orientation and size on glenohumeral instability: a biomechanical analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 24(2):533–539
Sperber A, Hamberg P, Karlsson J et al (2001) Comparison of an arthroscopic and an open procedure for posttraumatic instability of the shoulder: A prospective, randomized multicenter study. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 10(2):105–108
Steffen V, Hertel R (2013) Rim reconstruction with autogenous iliac crest for anterior glenoid deficiency: forty-three instability cases followed for 5–19 years. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 22(4):550–559
Sugaya H, Moriishi J, Dohi M, Kon Y, Tsuchiya A. (2003) Glenoid rim morphology in recurrent anterior glenohumeral instability. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 85-A(5):878–84.
Sugaya H, Takahashi N, Kawai N, Nagai H, Shimada N, Tanaka M, Moriishi J (2012) Arthroscopic iliac bone grafting for unstable shoulders with signify glenoid bone loss. The Shoulder Joint (English abstract). 36(2):383–387
Wong IH, King JP, Boyd G, Mitchell M, Coady C (2018) Radiographic analysis of glenoid size and shape after arthroscopic coracoid autograft versus distal tibial allograft in the treatment of anterior shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med. 46(11):2717–2724
Yamamoto N, Itoi E, Minagawa H, Seki N, Shimada Y, Okada K (2007) Contact between the glenoid and the humeral head in abduction, external rotation, and horizontal extension: a new concept of glenoid track. J Shoulder Elbow Surg. 16(5):649–656
Yoneda M, Hayashida K, Wakitani S, Nakagawa S, Fukushima S (1999) Bankart procedure augmented by coracoid transfer for contact athletes with traumatic anterior shoulder instability. Am J Sports Med. 27(1):21–26
Yoneda M, Mizuno N, Yamada S, Sahara W, Mae T (2016) Transosseous-equivalent arthroscopyic Bankart repair by twin anchor footprint fixateon (TAFF) technique using JuggerKnotTM soft anchor. Advances in shoulder surgery, Springer Japan, pp 69–84
Zhao J, Huangfu X, Yang X, Xie G, Xu C (2014) Arthroscopic glenoid bone grafting with nonrigid fixation for anterior shoulder instability: 52 patients with 2- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med. 42(4):831–839
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Ethical approval
This study was approved by the institutional review board of Osaka Hospital of Japan Community Health Care Organization (No. 201855).
Informed consent
Written informed consent was obtained from all patients.
Additional information
Publisher's Note
Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.
Electronic supplementary material
Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Iizawa, N., Yoneda, M., Yamada, S. et al. Benefits of bone graft augmentation to arthroscopic Bankart repair for recurrent anterior shoulder instability with glenoid bone loss. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 2325–2333 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05746-2
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05746-2