Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Plate removal without loss of correction after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is possible when posterior cortex bone union reaches osteotomy gap center even in incompletely filled gaps

  • KNEE
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The study aimed to evaluate the optimal timing for plate removal after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy (OWHTO) without loss of correction and to investigate risk factors for loss of correction after plate removal. The study presents the hypothesis that plate removal without loss of correction was possible when gap filling reached zone 2 (25–50%) on anteroposterior radiographs.

Methods

Ninety-one patients (101 knees) who underwent OWHTO using the TomoFix® plate were enrolled. Plate removal was performed at an average 16.4 ± 5.4 months after OWHTO. Clinical evaluation included plate-related symptoms, the Japanese Orthopedic Association Knee Score (JOA score), and Oxford Knee Score (OKS). Radiological outcomes, including the hip–knee–ankle angle (HKA), weight-bearing line ratio (WBLR), medial proximal tibial angle (MPTA), and posterior tibial slope (PTS), were evaluated preoperatively, at plate removal and at 1 year after plate removal. Computed tomography (CT) was performed at plate removal to evaluate the flange bone union, progression rates of gap filling, and posterior cortex bone union. In addition, the risk factors for loss of correction after plate removal were evaluated.

Results

At plate removal, 63 (62.4%) knees had plate-related symptoms (mild, 56 knees; moderate, 7 knees; severe, 0). After plate removal, the JOA score did not change, whereas OKS further improved; six knees developed loss of correction. On CT evaluation at plate removal, the flange bone union was achieved in all cases; the progression rates of gap filling and posterior cortex bone union were 47.0% ± 16.6% and 62.8% ± 16.5%, respectively. A posterior cortex union rate of < 43.3% was the only predictor for loss of correction after plate removal (odds ratio: 1.38, P < 0.01).

Conclusions

Plate removal without loss of correction after OWHTO was possible when bone union of the posterior cortex reached the center of the osteotomy gap even in incompletely filled gaps.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic case series, Level IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Agneskirchner JD, Freiling D, Hurschler C, Lobenhoffer P (2006) Primary stability of four different implants for opening wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:291–300

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aoki Y, Yasuda K, Mikami S, Ohmoto H, Majima T, Minami A (2006) Inverted V-shaped high tibial osteotomy compared with closing-wedge high tibial osteotomy for osteoarthritis of the knee: ten-year follow-up result. J Bone Jt Surg Br 88:1336–1340

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bode G, von Heyden J, Pestka J, Schmal H, Salzmann G, Südkamp N, Niemeyer P (2015) Prospective 5-year survival rate data following open-wedge valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:1949–1955

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brinkman JM, Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD, Staubli AE, Wymenga AB, van Heerwaarden RJ (2008) Osteotomies around the knee: patient selection, stability of fixation and bone healing in high tibial osteotomies. J Bone Jt Surg Br 90:1548–1557

    Article  Google Scholar 

  5. Brosset T, Pasquier G, Migaud H, Gougeon F (2011) Opening wedge high tibial osteotomy performed without filling the defect but with locking plate fixation (TomoFix™) and early weight-bearing: prospective evaluation of bone union, precision and maintenance of correction in 51 cases. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 97:705–711

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Conteduca F, Di Sette P, Iorio R, Caperna L, Argento G, Mazza D, Ferretti A (2016) Nanohydroxyapatite promotes the healing process in open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a CT study. Knee 23:763–769

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Cotic M, Vogt S, Feucht MJ, Saier T, Minzlaff P, Hinterwimmer S, Imhoff AB (2015) Prospective evaluation of a new plate fixator for valgus-producing medial open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23:3707–3716

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Darees M, Putman S, Brosset T, Roumazeille T, Pasquier G, Migaud H (2018) Opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy performed with locking plate fixation (TomoFix) and early weight-bearing but without filling the defect. A concise follow-up note of 48 cases at 10 years’ follow-up. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 104:477–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Dexel J, Fritzsche H, Beyer F, Harman MK, Lutzner J (2017) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy: incidence of lateral cortex fractures and influence of fixation device on osteotomy healing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:832–837

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Floerkemeier S, Staubli AE, Schroeter S, Goldhahn S, Lobenhoffer P (2013) Outcome after high tibial open-wedge osteotomy: a retrospective evaluation of 533 patients. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:170–180

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Fucentese SF, Tscholl PM, Sutter R, Brucker PU, Meyer DC, Koch PP (2018) Bone autografting in medial open wedge high tibial osteotomy results in improved osseous gap healing on computed tomography, but no functional advantage: a prospective, randomised, controlled trial. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-018-5285-8

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Sakagoshi D, Shigemoto K, Hatsuchi Y, Akahane M (2017) Age does not affect the clinical and radiological outcomes after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25:918–923

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Goshima K, Sawaguchi T, Shigemoto K, Iwai S, Nakanishi A, Inoue D, Shima Y (2019) Large opening gaps, unstable hinge fractures, and osteotomy line below the safe zone cause delayed bone healing after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 27:1291–1298

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Jung WH, Chun CW, Lee JH, Ha JH, Kim JH, Jeong JH (2013) Comparative study of medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy using 2 different implants. Arthroscopy 29:1063–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Kobayashi H, Akamatsu Y, Kumagai K, Kusayama Y, Saito T (2017) Radiographic and computed tomographic evaluation of bone union after medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy with filling gap. Knee 24:1108–1117

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Lobenhoffer P, Agneskirchner JD (2003) Improvements in surgical technique of valgus high tibial osteotomy. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 11:132–138

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Murray DW, Fitzpatrick R, Rogers K, Pandit H, Beard DJ, Carr AJ, Dawson J (2007) The use of the Oxford hip and knee scores. J Bone Jt Surg Br 89:1010–1014

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Niemeyer P, Koestler W, Kaehny C et al (2008) Two-year results of open-wedge high tibial osteotomy with fixation by medial plate fixator for medial compartment arthritis with varus malalignment of the knee. Arthroscopy 24:796–804

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Niemeyer P, Schmal H, Hauschild O, von Heyden J, Südkamp NP, Köstler W (2010) Open-wedge osteotomy using an internal plate fixator in patients with medial-compartment gonarthritis and varus malalignment: 3-year results with regard to preoperative arthroscopic and radiographic findings. Arthroscopy 26:1607–1616

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Rodner CM, Adams DJ, Diaz-Doran V et al (2006) Medial opening wedge tibial osteotomy and the sagittal plane: the effect of increasing tibial slope on tibiofemoral contact pressure. Am J Sports Med 34:1431–1441

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Rubino LJ, Schoderbek RJ, Golish SR, Baumfeld J, Miller MD (2008) The effect of plate position and size on tibial slope in high tibial osteotomy: a cadaveric study. J Knee Surg 21:75–79

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Schuster P, Schulz M, Mayer P, Schlumberger M, Immendoerfer M, Richter J (2015) Open-wedge high tibial osteotomy and combined abrasion/microfracture in severe medial osteoarthritis and varus malalignment: 5-year results and arthroscopic findings after 2 years. Arthroscopy 31:1279–1288

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Slevin O, Ayeni OR, Hinterwimmer S, Tischer T, Feucht MJ, Hirschmann MT (2016) The role of bone void fillers in medial opening wedge high tibial osteotomy: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24:3584–3598

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Staubli AE, De Simoni C, Babst R, Lobenhoffer P (2003) TomoFix: a new LCP-concept for open wedge osteotomy of the medial proximal tibia–early results in 92 cases. Injury 34:B55–B62

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Staubli AE, Jacob HA (2010) Evolution of open-wedge high-tibial osteotomy: experience with a special angular stable device for internal fixation without interposition material. Int Orthop 34:167–172

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Takeuchi R, Ishikawa H, Kumagai K, Yamaguchi Y, Chiba N, Akamatsu Y, Saito T (2012) Fractures around the lateral cortical hinge after a medial opening-wedge high tibial osteotomy: a new classification of lateral hinge fracture. Arthroscopy 28:85–94

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Takeuchi R, Woon-Hwa J, Ishikawa H, Yamaguchi Y, Osawa K, Akamatsu Y, Kuroda K (2017) Primary stability of different plate positions and the role of bone substitute in open wedge high tibial osteotomy. Knee 24:1299–1306

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Funding

There is no funding source.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedic Surgery and Joint Reconstructive Surgery, Toyama Municipal Hospital, 2-1 Imaizumi Hokubu-machi, Toyama, 939-8511, Japan

    Kenichi Goshima, Takeshi Sawaguchi, Kenji Shigemoto, Shintaro Iwai, Kenji Fujita & Tomoyuki Kataoka

Authors
  1. Kenichi Goshima
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Takeshi Sawaguchi
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Kenji Shigemoto
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Shintaro Iwai
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  5. Kenji Fujita
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  6. Tomoyuki Kataoka
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kenichi Goshima.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors did not receive and will not receive any benefits or funding from any commercial party related directly or indirectly to the subject of this article.

Ethical approval

This retrospective case series was approved by the Ethics Committee of Toyama Municipal Hospital (IRB No. 2018-23).

Informed consent

Informed consent was obtained from all individual participants included in the study.

Additional information

Publisher's Note

Springer Nature remains neutral with regard to jurisdictional claims in published maps and institutional affiliations.

Electronic supplementary material

Below is the link to the electronic supplementary material.

Supplementary material 1 (XLSX 46 kb)

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Goshima, K., Sawaguchi, T., Shigemoto, K. et al. Plate removal without loss of correction after open-wedge high tibial osteotomy is possible when posterior cortex bone union reaches osteotomy gap center even in incompletely filled gaps. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 28, 1827–1834 (2020). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05615-y

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-019-05615-y

Keywords

Search

Navigation