Skip to main content
Log in

Good clinical and MRI outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair in the knee

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To analyze the clinical outcome and cartilage regeneration after all-arthroscopic Autologous Chondrocyte Implantation (ACI) using chondrospheres® (ACT3D) for the treatment of full-size articular cartilage lesions at the knee.

Methods

Thirty consecutive patients treated by all-arthroscopic ACI for full-size articular cartilage lesions in an otherwise healthy knee were enrolled. The defects were located on the femoral condyles (n = 18), in the trochlea (n = 7) and at the patella (n = 5). Follow-up consisted of a clinical evaluation with assessment of subjective scores. Patient satisfaction was evaluated on a visual analog scale (VAS). 3-Tesla MRI and T2 mapping of the operated and the contralateral healthy knees were included to control the quality of the regenerated cartilage. The MOCART score was assessed by three blinded independent radiologists.

Results

At the mean follow-up of 3 years ± 10.2 months 26 of the 30 patients (86.6%) were subjectively highly satisfied with the surgical result and assured they would undergo the same procedure again. The mean Lysholm score increased to 77.7 ± 14.6, the mean subjective IKDC significantly to 84.2 ± 5.6 (p < 0.05) and all five subgroups of the KOOS improved significantly (p < 0.05). The subjective outcome was not influenced by the duration of symptoms, age, location, size of defects nor dose of spheroids. The modified MOCART score was a mean of 60 ± 21 (0–80) points. Twenty-four patients (82.7%) were rated higher than 60 points. T2 mapping documented similar cartilage quality of the area of the ACI and the same location at the contralateral knee. Three patients had a MOCART score of 0 with few or no cartilage regeneration on MRI and were considered as failure of the ACI.

Conclusion

In this small cohort of 30 patients, minimal invasive all-arthroscopic ACT 3D using spheroids led to convincing clinical short-to-mid-term results with a significant increase in patients quality of life, satisfaction, reduction of pain, and improvement in knee function. The high morphologic integrity and quality of the ACI was reconfirmed by the Mocart Score and T2 mapping.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Bartlett W, Krishnan SP, Skinner JA, Carrington RWJ, Briggs TWR, Bentley G (2006) Collagen-covered versus matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects of the knee: a comparison of tourniquet times. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol 16(4):315–317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  2. Bhosale AM, Richardson JB (2008) Articular cartilage: structure, injuries and review of management. Br Med Bull 87:77–95

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Blackman AJ, Smith MV, Flanigan DC, Matava MJ, Wright RW, Brophy RH (2013) Correlation between magnetic resonance imaging and clinical outcomes after cartilage repair surgery in the knee: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Am J Sports Med 41(6):1426–1434

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331(14):889–895

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Brittberg M, Peterson L, Sjogren-Jansson E, Tallheden T, Lindahl A (2003) Articular cartilage engineering with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. A review of recent developments. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A(Suppl 3):109–115

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Brittberg M, Tallheden T, Sjogren-Jansson B, Lindahl A, Peterson L (2001) Autologous chondrocytes used for articular cartilage repair: an update. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S337–S348

    Article  Google Scholar 

  7. Browne JE, Anderson AF, Arciero R, Mandelbaum B, Moseley JB Jr, Micheli LJ, Fu F, Erggelet C (2005) Clinical outcome of autologous chondrocyte implantation at 5 years in US subjects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 436:237–245

    Article  Google Scholar 

  8. Cain EL, Clancy WG (2001) Treatment algorithm for osteochondral injuries of the knee. Clin Sports Med 20(2):321–342

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Cherubino P, Grassi FA, Bulgheroni P, Ronga M (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report. J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) 11(1):10–15

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Cicchetti DV (1994) Guidelines, criteria, and rules of thumb for evaluating normed and standardized assessment instruments in psychology. Psychol Assess 6(4):284–290

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Dell’Accio F, Vanlauwe J, Bellemans J, Neys J, De Bari C, Luyten FP (2003) Expanded phenotypically stable chondrocytes persist in the repair tissue and contribute to cartilage matrix formation and structural integration in a goat model of autologous chondrocyte implantation. J Orthop Res 21(1):123–131

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Erggelet C, Sittinger M, Lahm A (2003) The arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the knee joint. Arthroscopy 19(1):108–110

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Ewing JW, Voto SJ (1988) Arthroscopic surgical management of osteochondritis dissecans of the knee. Arthroscopy 4(1):37–40

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Farr J (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation improves patellofemoral cartilage treatment outcomes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 463:187–194

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Fickert S, Gerwien P, Helmert B, Schattenberg T, Weckbach S, Kaszkin-Bettag M, Lehmann L (2012) One-year clinical and radiological results of a prospective, investigator-initiated trial examining a novel, purely autologous 3-dimensional autologous chondrocyte transplantation product in the knee. Cartilage 3(1):27–42

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  16. Friedman MJ, Berasi CC, Fox JM, Del Pizzo W, Snyder SJ, Ferkel RD (1984) Preliminary results with abrasion arthroplasty in the osteoarthritic knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 182:200–205

    Google Scholar 

  17. Ghivizzani SC, Oligino TJ, Robbins PD, Evans CH (2000) Cartilage injury and repair. Phys Med Rehabil Clin N Am 11(2):289–307

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Giannini S, Buda R, Vannini F, Di Caprio F, Grigolo B (2008) Arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation in osteochondral lesions of the talus: surgical technique and results. Am J Sports Med 36(5):873–880

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gooding CR, Bartlett W, Bentley G, Skinner JA, Carrington R, Flanagan A (2006) A prospective, randomised study comparing two techniques of autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondral defects in the knee: Periosteum covered versus type I/III collagen covered. Knee 13(3):203–210

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Grigolo B, Lisignoli G, Piacentini A, Fiorini M, Gobbi P, Mazzotti G, Duca M, Pavesio A, Facchini A (2002) Evidence for redifferentiation of human chondrocytes grown on a hyaluronan-based biomaterial (HYAff 11): molecular, immunohistochemical and ultrastructural analysis. Biomaterials 23(4):1187–1195

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Gudas R, Kalesinskas RJ, Kimtys V, Stankevicius E, Toliusis V, Bernotavicius G, Smailys A (2005) A prospective randomized clinical study of mosaic osteochondral autologous transplantation versus microfracture for the treatment of osteochondral defects in the knee joint in young athletes. Arthroscopy 21(9):1066–1075

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Haddo O, Mahroof S, Higgs D, David L, Pringle J, Bayliss M, Cannon SR, Briggs TW (2004) The use of chondrogide membrane in autologous chondrocyte implantation. Knee 11(1):51–55

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hunziker EB (2002) Articular cartilage repair: basic science and clinical progress. A review of the current status and prospects. Osteoarthr Cartil 10(6):432–463

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Johnson LL (1986) Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty historical and pathologic perspective: present status. Arthroscopy 2(1):54–69

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Johnson LL (2001) Arthroscopic abrasion arthroplasty: a review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S306–S317

    Article  Google Scholar 

  26. King PJ, Bryant T, Minas T (2002) Autologous chondrocyte implantation for chondral defects of the knee: indications and technique. J Knee Surg 15(3):177–184

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2009) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 37(1):33–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Krishnan SP, Skinner JA, Bartlett W, Carrington RW, Flanagan AM, Briggs TW, Bentley G (2006) Who is the ideal candidate for autologous chondrocyte implantation? J Bone Joint Surg Br 88(1):61–64

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Liess C, Lusse S, Karger N, Heller M, Gluer CC (2002) Detection of changes in cartilage water content using MRI T2-mapping in vivo. Osteoarthritis Cartilage 10(12):907–913

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Mandelbaum B, Browne JE, Fu F, Micheli LJ, Moseley JB Jr, Erggelet C, Anderson AF (2007) Treatment outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation for full-thickness articular cartilage defects of the trochlea. Am J Sports Med 35(6):915–921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Mankin HJ (1982) The response of articular cartilage to mechanical injury. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64(3):460–466

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Kutscha-Lissberg F, Resinger C, Aldrian SM, Vecsei V, Trattnig S (2005) Early postoperative adherence of matrix-induced autologous chondrocyte implantation for the treatment of full-thickness cartilage defects of the femoral condyle. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(6):451–457

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Marlovits S, Striessnig G, Resinger CT, Aldrian SM, Vecsei V, Imhof H, Trattnig S (2004) Definition of pertinent parameters for the evaluation of articular cartilage repair tissue with high-resolution magnetic resonance imaging. Eur J Radiol 52(3):310–319

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Marlovits S, Zeller P, Singer P, Resinger C, Vecsei V (2006) Cartilage repair: generations of autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Eur J Radiol 57(1):24–31

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Micheli LJ, Browne JE, Erggelet C, Fu F, Mandelbaum B, Moseley JB, Zurakowski D (2001) Autologous chondrocyte implantation of the knee: multicenter experience and minimum 3-year follow-up. Clin J Sport Med 11(4):223–228

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Micheli LJ, Moseley JB, Anderson AF, Browne JE, Erggelet C, Arciero R, Fu FH, Mandelbaum BR (2006) Articular cartilage defects of the distal femur in children and adolescents: treatment with autologous chondrocyte implantation. J Pediatr Orthop 26(4):455–460

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Mithoefer K, McAdams T, Williams RJ, Kreuz PC, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Clinical efficacy of the microfracture technique for articular cartilage repair in the knee: an evidence-based systematic analysis. Am J Sports Med 37(10):2053–2063

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Moriya T, Wada Y, Watanabe A, Sasho T, Nakagawa K, Mainil-Varlet P, Moriya H (2007) Evaluation of reparative cartilage after autologous chondrocyte implantation for osteochondritis dissecans: histology, biochemistry, and MR imaging. J Orthop Sci 12(3):265–273

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Nehrer S, Spector M, Minas T (1999) Histologic analysis of tissue after failed cartilage repair procedures. Clin Orthop Relat Res 365:149–162

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Niemeyer P, Laute V, John T, Becher C, Diehl P, Kolombe T, Fay J, Siebold R, Niks M, Fickert S, Zinser W (2016) The effect of cell dose on the early magnetic resonance morphological outcomes of autologous cell implantation for articular cartilage defects in the knee: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 44(8):2005–2014

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Niemeyer P, Porichis S, Steinwachs M, Erggelet C, Kreuz PC, Schmal H, Uhl M, Ghanem N, Sudkamp NP, Salzmann G (2014) Long-term outcomes after first-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage defects of the knee. Am J Sports Med 42(1):150–157

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Peterson L (1996) Articular cartilage injuries treated with autologous chondrocyte transplantation in the human knee. Acta Orthop Belg 62(Suppl 1):196–200

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Peterson L, Brittberg M, Kiviranta I, Akerlund EL, Lindahl A (2002) Autologous chondrocyte transplantation. Biomechanics and long-term durability. Am J Sports Med 30(1):2–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Peterson L, Minas T, Brittberg M, Nilsson A, Sjogren-Jansson E, Lindahl A (2000) Two- to 9-year outcome after autologous chondrocyte transplantation of the knee. Clin Orthop Relat Res 374:212–234

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Peterson L, Vasiliadis HS, Brittberg M, Lindahl A (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation: a long-term follow-up. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1117–1124

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  46. Pridie KH (1959) A method of resurfacing osteoarthritic knee joints. J Bone Joint Surg Br 41(3):618–619

    Google Scholar 

  47. Robertson WB, Fick D, Wood DJ, Linklater JM, Zheng MH, Ackland TR (2007) MRI and clinical evaluation of collagen-covered autologous chondrocyte implantation (CACI) at two years. Knee 14(2):117–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Roos EM, Roos HP, Lohmander LS, Ekdahl C, Beynnon BD (1998) Knee Injury and Osteoarthritis Outcome Score (KOOS)–development of a self-administered outcome measure. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 28(2):88–96

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  49. Saris DB, Vanlauwe J, Victor J, Almqvist KF, Verdonk R, Bellemans J, Luyten FP (2009) Treatment of symptomatic cartilage defects of the knee: characterized chondrocyte implantation results in better clinical outcome at 36 months in a randomized trial compared to microfracture. Am J Sports Med 37(Suppl 1):10S–19S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Schubert T, Anders S, Neumann E, Scholmerich J, Hofstadter F, Grifka J, Muller-Ladner U, Libera J, Schedel J (2009) Long-term effects of chondrospheres on cartilage lesions in an autologous chondrocyte implantation model as investigated in the SCID mouse model. Int J Mol Med 23(4):455–460

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Siebold R, Karidakis G, Feil S, Fernandez F (2016) Second-look assessment after all-arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation with spheroides at the knee joint. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 24(5):1678–1685

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  52. Siebold R, Karidakis G, Fernandez F (2014) Clinical outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction and autologous chondrocyte implantation following recurrent patella dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(10):2477–2483

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  53. Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Rodrigo JJ (2001) Microfracture: surgical technique and rehabilitation to treat chondral defects. Clin Orthop Relat Res 391(Suppl):S362–S369

    Article  Google Scholar 

  54. Steinwachs M, Kreuz PC (2007) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in chondral defects of the knee with a type I/III collagen membrane: a prospective study with a 3-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 23(4):381–387

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    Google Scholar 

  56. Vasiliadis HS, Danielson B, Ljungberg M, McKeon B, Lindahl A, Peterson L (2010) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in cartilage lesions of the knee: long-term evaluation with magnetic resonance imaging and delayed gadolinium-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging technique. Am J Sports Med 38(5):943–949

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Rainer Siebold.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest.

Funding

No funding has been received for this study.

Ethical approval

The study was approved by the institutional ethical review board of the University of Heidelberg (ID: S-323/2010).

Informed consent

Patients gave individual written informed consent.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Siebold, R., Suezer, F., Schmitt, B. et al. Good clinical and MRI outcome after arthroscopic autologous chondrocyte implantation for cartilage repair in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 26, 831–839 (2018). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4491-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-017-4491-0

Keywords

Navigation