Abstract
Purpose
The European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy (ESSKA) congress is an important venue, and the research presented can be a critical source of information used to impact clinical decisions and health policies. The purpose of this study was to evaluate the level of evidence of clinical free papers presented at the ESSKA congress from 2008 to 2016. Moreover, this study evaluated whether there were any changes in the distribution of level of evidence over time.
Methods
Two reviewers screened the free papers presented at the ESSKA biannual congresses 2008–2016 for clinical evidence. Clinical papers included observational studies and trials involving direct interaction between an investigator and human subjects. Biomechanical studies, technique demonstrations, cadaveric studies, and panel discussions were excluded. The reviewers independently graded their level of evidence from level I (e.g. high-quality randomized trials) to level IV (e.g. case series and reports) using the classification system published by the American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons.
Results
Of 1036 free papers that were identified, 729 met the inclusion criteria and were evaluated. Overall, 18% of studies were level I, 24% level II, 25% level III, and 33% level IV evidence. There was a significant improvement in level of evidence over time (p < 0.0001), with the proportion of level I studies increasing most dramatically (9% in 2008, 20% in 2012, 24% in 2016). Free papers studying the knee had higher levels of evidence than those evaluating other joints (p = 0.002).
Conclusion
The level of evidence of clinical free papers presented at the ESSKA congress between 2008 and 2016 is high relative to other orthopaedic meetings. Moreover, there has been a significant improvement in the level of evidence over time.
Level of evidence
Systematic review, Level IV.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ayeni OR, Levy BA, Musahl V, Safran MR (2014) Current state-of-the-art of hip arthroscopy. Knee Surg Sport Traumatol Arthrosc 22:711–713
Bhandari M, Richards RR, Sprague S, Schemitsch EH (2002) The Quality of Reporting of Randomized Trials in The Journal of Bone and Joint Surgery from 1988 through 2000. J Bone Joint Surg 84:388–396
Burns PB, Rohrich RJ, Chong KC (2011) The Levels of Evidence and their role in Evidence-Based Medicine. Plast Reconstr Surg 128:305–310
Colvin AC, Harrast J, Harner C (2012) Trends in Hip Arthroscopy. J Bone Joint Surg 94:e23 (1) – e23 (5)
Kay J, Memon M, Simunovic N, Ayeni OR (2015) Level of clinical evidence presented at the Arthroscopy Association of North America Annual Meeting over 10 years (2006-2015). Arthroscopy 32(4):686–691
Kay J, Shallow S, Simunovic N, Safran MR, Philippon MJ, Ayeni OR (2015) Level of clinical evidence presented at the International Society for Hip Arthroscopy Annual Scientific Meeting over 5 years (2010–2014). J Hip Preserv Surg 2(4):332–338
Kelley SP, Cashin MS, Douziech JR, Varghese RA, Mulpuri K (2010) Levels of Evidence at the Pediatric Orthopaedic Society of North America Annual Meetings. J Pediatr Orthop 30:612–616
Killian ML, Cavinatto L, Galatz LM, Thomopoulos S (2012) Recent advances in shoulder research. Arthritis Res Ther 14:214
Kooistra B, Dijkman B, Einhorn TA, Bhandari M (2009) How to design a good case series. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(Suppl 3):21–26
Landis JR, Koch GG (1977) The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics 33:159–174
Lerman DM, Cable MG, Thornley P et al (2016) Has the Level of Evidence of Podium Presentations at the Musculoskeletal Tumor Society Annual Meeting Changed Over Time? Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-016-4763-x
Sackett DL (1986) Rules of evidence and clinical recommendations on the use of antithrombotic agents. Chest 89:2S–3S
Sackett DL, Rosenberg WMC, Gray JAM, Haynes RB, Richardson WS (1996) Evidence based medicine: what it is and what it isn’t. BMJ 312:71–72
Voleti PB, Donegan DJ, Baldwin KD et al (2012) Level of evidence of presentations at American Academy of Orthopaedic Surgeons annual meetings. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:e50
Werner BC, Burrus MT, Park JS, Perumal V, Gwathmey FW (2015) Trends in Ankle Arthroscopy and Its Use in the Management of Pathologic Conditions of the Lateral Ankle in the United States: a National Database Study. Arthroscopy 31:1330–1337
Wright JG (2005) Levels of evidence and grades of recommendations. AAOS Bull 53 http://www2.aaos.org/bulletin/apr05/fline9.asp. Accessed: 21 September 2016
Yeoh KM, King GJW, Faber KJ, Glazebrook MA, Athwal GS (2012) Evidence-based indications for elbow arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 28(2):272–282
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Ethics declarations
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interest.
Funding
This study received no funding to complete.
Ethical approval
This study did not require ethics approval at its institution.
Informed consent
As there was no individual participants in this study informed consent was not required.
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Kay, J., Memon, M., Rogozinsky, J. et al. Level of evidence of free papers presented at the European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery and Arthroscopy congress from 2008 to 2016. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 602–607 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4391-8
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4391-8