Abstract
Purpose
Malpositioning of the femoral entry point in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament (MPFL) can lead to abnormal and painful patellar kinematics and loss of flexion. Determination of this point is usually performed by palpation of anatomic landmarks. Accuracy of this method has not yet been investigated. The hypotheses were: 1. palpatory method is not as accurate as fluoroscopically guided method using established radiological criteria; 2. accuracy correlates with surgical experience.
Methods
Three surgeons of varying experience defined the femoral entry point for the MPFL by palpation in ten cadaveric legs. The blinded procedures were repeated three times, and subjective difficulty of the determination was recorded. Results were documented by fluoroscopy on a true lateral radiograph. The accuracy was assessed using established radiological criteria. Surgical experience was correlated with the results, and confounding or interacting variables were assessed.
Results
Mean deviation from the correct zone for the femoral entry point was 3.5 mm (range 0–18 mm). Twenty-nine percent of all palpatory determinations were inside the correct zone, 47 % were within 5 mm distance from the correct zone, and 23 % were further than 5 mm apart from the correct zone (“outliers”). No significant difference was found between surgeons of varying experience. No correlation was observed between subjective difficulty of the procedure and accuracy of determination.
Conclusions
The validity of the isolated palpatory determination of the femoral entry point in MPFL reconstruction seems to be insufficient, regardless of surgical experience. Derived from this study, fluoroscopic guidance is used in our clinic by default.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Barnett AJ, Howells NR, Burston BJ, Ansari A, Clark D, Eldridge JD (2012) Radiographic landmarks for tunnel placement in reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(12):2380–2384
Becher C, Kley K, Lobenhoffer P, Ezechieli M, Smith T, Ostermeier S (2014) Dynamic versus static reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for recurrent lateral patellar dislocation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(10):2452–2457
Bollier M, Fulkerson J, Cosgarea A, Tanaka M (2011) Technical failure of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27(8):1153–1159
Bollier M, Smith PA (2014) Anterior cruciate ligament and medial collateral ligament injuries. J Knee Surg 27(5):359–368
Buckens CF, Saris DB (2010) Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament for treatment of patellofemoral instability: a systematic review. Am J Sports Med 38(1):181–188
Elias JJ, Cosgarea AJ (2006) Technical errors during medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction could overload medial patellofemoral cartilage: a computational analysis. Am J Sports Med 34(9):1478–1485
Enderlein D, Nielsen T, Christiansen SE, Fauno P, Lind M (2014) Clinical outcome after reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament in patients with recurrent patella instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(10):2458–2464
Fucentese SF, Zingg PO, Schmitt J, Pfirrmann CW, Meyer DC, Koch PP (2011) Classification of trochlear dysplasia as predictor of clinical outcome after trochleoplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(10):1655–1661
Fujino K, Tajima G, Yan J, Kamei Y, Maruyama M, Takeda S, Kikuchi S, Shimamura T (2015) Morphology of the femoral insertion site of the medial patellofemoral ligament. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23(4):998–1003
Hopper GP, Leach WJ, Rooney BP, Walker CR, Blyth MJ (2014) Does degree of trochlear dysplasia and position of femoral tunnel influence outcome after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med 42(3):716–722
Howells NR, Barnett AJ, Ahearn N, Ansari A, Eldridge JD (2012) Medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction: a prospective outcome assessment of a large single centre series. J Bone Joint Surg Br 94(9):1202–1208
Kaipel M, Schutzenberger S, Farr S, Gergely I, Vlcek A, Kainberger F, Boszotta H, Pretterklieber M (2015) Reliability of radiographic landmarks in medial patello-femoral ligament reconstruction in relation to the anatomical femoral torsion. Int Orthop 39(3):423–428
Lippacher S, Dreyhaupt J, Williams SR, Reichel H, Nelitz M (2014) Reconstruction of the medial patellofemoral ligament: clinical outcomes and return to sports. Am J Sports Med 42(7):1661–1668
Nomura E, Inoue M, Osada N (2005) Anatomical analysis of the medial patellofemoral ligament of the knee, especially the femoral attachment. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(7):510–515
Placella G, Tei M, Sebastiani E, Speziali A, Antinolfi P, Delcogliano M, Georgoulis A, Cerulli G (2015) Anatomy of the medial patello-femoral ligament: a systematic review of the last 20 years literature. Musculoskelet Surg 99(2):93–103
Placella G, Tei MM, Sebastiani E, Criscenti G, Speziali A, Mazzola C, Georgoulis A, Cerulli G (2014) Shape and size of the medial patellofemoral ligament for the best surgical reconstruction: a human cadaveric study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22(10):2327–2333
Redfern J, Kamath G, Burks R (2010) Anatomical confirmation of the use of radiographic landmarks in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38(2):293–297
Schottle PB, Fucentese SF, Romero J (2005) Clinical and radiological outcome of medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction with a semitendinosus autograft for patella instability. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13(7):516–521
Schottle PB, Schmeling A, Rosenstiel N, Weiler A (2007) Radiographic landmarks for femoral tunnel placement in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 35(5):801–804
Steensen RN, Dopirak RM, McDonald WG 3rd (2004) The anatomy and isometry of the medial patellofemoral ligament: implications for reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 32(6):1509–1513
Stephen JM, Kaider D, Lumpaopong P, Deehan DJ, Amis AA (2014) The effect of femoral tunnel position and graft tension on patellar contact mechanics and kinematics after medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 42(2):364–372
Tateishi T, Tsuchiya M, Motosugi N, Asahina S, Ikeda H, Cho S, Muneta T (2011) Graft length change and radiographic assessment of femoral drill hole position for medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19(3):400–407
Thiel W (1992) The preservation of the whole corpse with natural color. Ann Anat 174(3):185–195
Thiel W (2002) Supplement to the conservation of an entire cadaver according to W. Thiel. Ann Anat 184(3):267–269
Viste A, Chatelet F, Desmarchelier R, Fessy MH (2014) Anatomical study of the medial patello-femoral ligament: landmarks for its surgical reconstruction. Surg Radiol Anat 36(8):733–739
Wijdicks CA, Griffith CJ, LaPrade RF, Johansen S, Sunderland A, Arendt EA, Engebretsen L (2009) Radiographic identification of the primary medial knee structures. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91(3):521–529
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Herschel, R., Hasler, A., Tscholl, P.M. et al. Visual-palpatory versus fluoroscopic intraoperative determination of the femoral entry point in medial patellofemoral ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 2545–2549 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4057-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4057-6