Skip to main content
Log in

Web-based survey results: surgeon practice patterns in Italy regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The aim of this study was to report Italian orthopaedic surgeons’ management of choice for ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation, and to compare surgical applications and rehabilitation approaches of Italian surgeons to the current approaches of “ACL Study Group”. A secondary purpose was to compare the preferences of subgroup based on graft choice, surgical techniques and experience.

Methods

A web-based survey was developed to investigate the attitudes of members of a national association specialized in sports traumatology and knee surgery (SIGASCOT) regarding surgical techniques, routine post-operative applications, rehabilitation approaches and starting time of specific activities and exercises following ACL reconstruction.

Results

The response rate was 17 % (131 questionnaires). The most popular graft type was hamstring tendon (81 % in male patients, and 91 % in female patients). The rate of continuous passive motion use was 55 %. Half surgeons routinely used a brace (49 %), usually a hinged brace. In total, 33.0 % of surgeons allowed patients to load the operated knee as much as tolerated within the first 2 weeks. Fifty-nine per cent of surgeons did not limit full flexion within the first 2 weeks. Most surgeons advise to wait until 4 months or more (97 %) for return to sports not requiring contact, and 6 months or more for full-contact sport (86 %).

Conclusions

This survey demonstrates clear trends in the practice of ACL reconstruction and rehabilitation in Italy. The data obtained from the SIGASCOT members revealed a more conservative approach when compared to the current approaches of “ACL Study Group”.

Level of evidence

Cross-sectional survey, Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Barber-Westin SD, Noyes FR (2011) Factors used to determine return to unrestricted sports activities after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 27:1697–1705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Beard DJ, Anderson JL, Davies S, Price AJ, Dodd CAF (2001) Hamstring versus patella tendon for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomised controlled trial. Knee 8:45–50

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Biau DJ, Tournoux C, Katsahian S, Schranz PJ, Nizard RS (2006) Bone-patellar tendon-bone autografts versus hamstring autografts for reconstruction of anterior cruciate ligament: meta-analysis. BMJ 332(7548):995–1001

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  4. Cabitza F, Ragone V, Arrigoni P, Karlsson J, Randelli P (2013) Management of knee injuries: consensus-based indications from a large community of orthopaedic surgeons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(3):708–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Campbell J (2010) Treatment trends with ACL, PCL, MCL and cartilage problems. ACL Study Group Meeting, 20–26 February 2010, Phuket

  6. Dauty M, Menu P, Dubois C (2010) Effects of running retraining after knee anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Ann Phys Rehabil Med 53(3):150–161

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Duracinsky M, Lalanne C, Goujard C, Herrmann S, Cheung-Lung C, Brosseau JP, Schwartz Y, Chassany O (2014) Electronic versus paper-based assessment of health-related quality of life specific to HIV disease: reliability study of the PROQOL-HIV questionnaire. J Med Internet Res 16(4):e115

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  8. Engstrom B, Sperber A, Wredmark T (1995) Continuous passive motion in rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 3:18–20

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Feller JA, Cooper R, Webster KE (2002) Current Australian trends in rehabilitation following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 9:121–126

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Fleming BC, Oksendahl H, Beynnon BD (2005) Open- or closed-kinetic chain exercises after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Exerc Sport Sci Rev 33:134–140

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Francis A, Thomas RD, McGregor A (2001) Anterior cruciate ligament rupture: reconstruction surgery and rehabilitation. A nation-wide survey of current practice. Knee 8:13–18

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Grant JA, Mohtadi NG (2010) Two- to 4-year follow-up to a comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38:1389–1394

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Grant JA, Mohtadi NG, Maitland ME, Zernicke RF (2005) Comparison of home versus physical therapy-supervised rehabilitation programs after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 33:1288–1297

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Gwaltney CJ, Shields AL, Shiffman S (2008) Equivalence of electronic and paper-and-pencil administration of patient-reported outcome measures: a meta-analytic review. Value Health 11:322–333

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Heijne A, Fleming BC, Renstrom PA, Peura GD, Beynnon BD, Werner S (2004) Strain on the anterior cruciate ligament during closed kinetic chain exercises. Med Sci Sports Exerc 36:935–941

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Herrington L, Wrapson C, Matthews M, Matthews H (2005) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Hamstring versus bone-patellar tendon-bone grafts: a systematic literature review of outcome from the surgery. Knee 12:41–50

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Höher J, Möller HD, Fu FH (1998) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: fact or fiction? Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:231–240

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ito Y, Deie M, Adachi N, Kobayashi K, Kanaya A, Miyamoto A, Nakasa T, Ochi M (2007) A prospective study of 3-day versus 2-week immobilization period after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee 14(1):34–38

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Kellerman SE, Herold J (2001) Physician response to surveys. A review of the literature. Am J Prev Med 20(1):61–67

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Kruse LM, Gray B, Wright RW (2012) Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a systematic review. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94:1737–1748

    Article  CAS  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  21. Kvist J (2004) Rehabilitation after anterior cruciate ligament injury: current recommendations for sports participation. Sports Med 34:269–280

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Lindström M, Strandberg S, Wredmark T, Felländer-Tsai L, Henriksson M (2013) Functional and muscle morphometric effects of ACL reconstruction. A prospective CT study with 1 year follow-up. Scand J Med Sci Sports 23(4):431–442

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Lindström M, Wredmark T, Wretling ML, Henriksson M, Felländer-Tsai L (2015) Post-operative bracing after ACL reconstruction has no effect on knee joint effusion. A prospective, randomized study. Knee. doi:10.1016/j.knee.2015.04.015

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. McCarthy MR, Buxton BP, Yates CK (1993) Effects of continuous passive motion on anterior laxity following ACL reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon grafts. J Sport Rehabil 2:171–178

    Article  Google Scholar 

  25. McCarthy MR, Yates CK, Anderson MA, Yates-McCarthy JL (1993) The effects of immediate continuous passive motion on pain during the inflammatory phase of soft tissue healing following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 17:96–101

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Middleton KK, Hamilton T, Irrgang JJ, Karlsson J, Harner CD, Fu FH (2014) Anatomic anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction: a global perspective. Part 1. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22:1467–1482

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Mohtadi NG, Chan DS, Dainty KN, Whelan DB (2011) Patellar tendon versus hamstring tendon autograft for anterior cruciate ligament rupture in adults. Cochrane Database Syst Rev 9:CD005960

    Google Scholar 

  28. Randelli P, Arrigoni P, Cabitza F, Ragone V, Cabitza P (2012) Current practice in shoulder pathology: results of a web-based survey among a community of 1084 orthopedic surgeons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(5):803–815

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Redfern J, Burks R (2009) 2009 survey results: surgeon practice patterns regarding arthroscopic surgery. Arthroscopy 25(12):1447–1452

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Richmond JC, Gladstone J, MacGillivray J (1991) Continuous passive motion after arthroscopically assisted anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison of short-versus long-term use. Arthroscopy 7:39–44

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Rosen MA, Jackson DW, Atwell EA (1992) The efficacy of continuous passive motion in the rehabilitation of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 20:122–127

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Shelbourne KD, Gray T (1997) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon graft followed by accelerated rehabilitation. A two- to nine-year follow up. Am J Sports Med 25:786–795

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Smith TO, Davies L (2008) A systematic review of bracing following reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament. Physiotherapy 94:1–10

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. Spindler KP, Kuhn JE, Freedman KB, Matthews CE, Dittus RS, Harrell FE Jr (2004) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction autograft choice: bone-tendon-bone versus hamstring: does it really matter? A systematic review. Am J Sports Med 32(8):1986–1995

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Tyler TF, McHugh MP, Gleim GW, Nicholas SJ (1998) The effect of immediate weightbearing after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Clin Orthop 357:141–148

    Article  Google Scholar 

  36. Vadalà A, Iorio R, De Carli A, Argento G, Di Sanzo V, Conteduca F, Ferretti A (2007) The effect of accelerated, brace free, rehabilitation on bone tunnel enlargement after ACL reconstruction using hamstring tendons: a CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:365–371

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Wright RW, Haas AK, Anderson J, Calabrese G, Cavanaugh J, Hewett TE, Lorring D, McKenzie C, Preston E, Williams G (2015) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction rehabilitation: MOON guidelines. Sports Health 7(3):239–243

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  38. Wright RW, Fetzer GB (2007) Bracing after ACL reconstruction: a systematic review. Clin Orthop Relat Res 455:162–168

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Yates CK, McCarthy MR, Hirsch HS, Pascale MS (1992) Effects of continuous passive motion following ACL reconstruction with autogenous patellar tendon grafts. J Sport Rehabil 1:121–131

    Article  Google Scholar 

  40. Zaffagnini S, Grassi A, Serra M, Marcacci M (2015) Return to sport after ACL reconstruction: how, when and why? A narrative review of current evidence. Joints 8(3):25–30

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

We would like to thank to all orthopaedists who participated in our questionnaire.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Consortia

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alberto Vascellari.

Ethics declarations

Conflict of interest

The authors declare no conflict of interest.

Appendix: Study questionnaire with summarized results

Appendix: Study questionnaire with summarized results

(1) How many ACL reconstructions are you performing per year?

<25

25–50

50–100

More than 100

37.2 %

28.7 %

22.5 %

11.6 %

(2) What type of graft you use preferably in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in male patients?

Patellar tendon

Hamstring (semitendinosus/gracilis) tendons

Quadriceps tendon

Allograft

Artificial ligament

16.5 %

81.1 %

0 %

1.6 %

0.8 %

(3) What type of graft you use preferably in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in female patients?

Patellar tendon

Hamstring (semitendinosus/gracilis) tendons

Quadriceps tendon

Allograft

Artificial ligament

6.4 %

91.2 %

0 %

1.6 %

0.8 %

(4) What type of graft you use preferably in the reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament in professional athletes?

Patellar tendon

Hamstring (semitendinosus/gracilis) tendons

Quadriceps tendon

Allograft

Artificial ligament

49.6 %

44.8 %

0 %

4.8 %

0.8 %

(5) Do you use the same graft regardless of the sport practiced?

Yes

No

 

56.0 %

44.0 %

(6) What type of surgery you use preferably?

Double bundle

Single bundle

 

7.0 %

93.0 %

(7) What type of surgery you use preferably to perform the femoral tunnel?

Transtibial

Anteromedial portal

Out-in technique

 

60.5 %

29.0 %

10.5 %

(8) What type of femoral fixation you use preferably?

Compression

Expansion

Cortical suspension

Cortico-cancellous suspension

Others

11.2 %

24.0 %

51.2 %

4.0 %

9.6 %

(9) Do you routinely brace your patients post-operatively?

Yes

No

 

49.19 %

50.8 %

If yes. What type of brace?

Mouldable

Hinged

Rigid

 
 

5.5 %

64.4 %

30.1 %

 

If yes. How long?

≤2 weeks

2–4 weeks

4–6 weeks

≥6 weeks

 

19.2 %

69.8 %

11.0 %

0.0 %

(10) What is the duration of loading post-operatively?

≤2 weeks

2–4 weeks

4–6 weeks

≥6 weeks

As much as it is tolerated

33.0 %

44.4 %

20.9 %

1.7 %

Limited loading

72.2 %

26.9 %

0.9 %

0.0 %

(11) Do your patients routinely use continuous passive motion post-operatively?

Yes

No

 

55.12 %

44.88 %

(12) Do you limit full flexion at the knee?

≤2 weeks

2–4 weeks

4–6 weeks

≥6 weeks

No

58.6 %

9.9 %

22.5 %

9.0 %

0°–90°

61.9 %

30.5 %

7.6 %

0.0 %

0°–45°

87.8 %

12.2 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

0°–20°

97.6 %

2.4 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

(13) Which of the below do you prefer following ACL reconstruction?

Home exercise programmes

Professional rehabilitation programmes

10.2 %

89.8 %

(14) Do you have standard rehabilitation programme?

Yes

No

 

84.3 %

15.7 %

(15) When do you start below specific activities/exercises?

 

≤2 weeks

2–4 weeks

4–6 weeks

≥6 weeks

Proprioceptive exercise

14.4 %

21.6 %

45.6 %

18.4 %

Exercise bicycle

2.4 %

30.4 %

50.4 %

16.8 %

 

≤4 weeks

4–6 weeks

6–8 weeks

≥8 weeks

Running in treadmill

1.6 %

9.6 %

37.60 %

51.20 %

Running in outside

0.8 %

2.5 %

12.3 %

84.4 %

 

≤6 weeks

6–12 weeks

3–6 months

≥6 months

Strengthening open kinetic chain quadriceps between 90° and 40°

12.0 %

44.8 %

34.4 %

8.8 %

 

≤2 months

2–4 months

≥4 months

never

Isokinetic exercises for strengthening

29.8 %

44.4 %

21.8 %

4.0 %

 

≤2 months

2–4 months

4–6 months

6–8 months

8–10 months

10–12 months

>12 months

Sport-specific rehabilitation

3.2 %

29.8 %

56.5 %

9.7 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Skills on sports not requiring contact

0.8 %

21.8 %

64.5 %

12.1 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

0.0 %

Skills on sports requiring contact

0.8 %

1.6 %

41.6 %

48.0 %

6.4 %

0.8 %

0.8 %

Return to sports not requiring contact

0.0 %

3.3 %

44.7 %

43.9 %

7.3 %

0.8 %

0.0 %

Return to sports requiring contact

0.0 %

0.8 %

13.6 %

58.4 %

20.8 %

6.4 %

0.0 %

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

Cite this article

Vascellari, A., Grassi, A., Combi, A. et al. Web-based survey results: surgeon practice patterns in Italy regarding anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction and rehabilitation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 2520–2527 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4007-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-016-4007-3

Keywords

Navigation