Abstract
Purpose
Bone tunnel creation techniques influence the 3-dimensional (3D) position of bone tunnels and graft-bending angle in anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction. This study assessed graft-bending angle and 3D characteristics of femoral bone tunnels and compared them between outside-in (OI) and transportal (TP) techniques.
Methods
Participants comprised 64 patients who underwent anatomic double-bundle ACL reconstruction, allocated to OI and TP groups (n = 32 each). The graft orientation plane exhibiting the largest graft-bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture with the knee in extension was reconstructed from CT data using 3D imaging software. In this plane, graft-bending angle was compared between the OI and TP techniques.
Results
Although positionings of the intra-articular apertures of the femoral and tibial bone tunnels were similar, several spatial parameters of bone tunnels differed between techniques. Graft-bending angles of both anteromedial and posterolateral bundles were significantly more acute with the OI technique than with the TP technique. On coronal-plane CT, angle of the bone tunnel axis relative to the distal condylar axis correlated negatively with graft-bending angle, while in the axial plane, angle of the bone tunnel axis relative to the posterior condylar axis correlated positively with graft-bending angle. Lysholm score, pivot shift test, and anteroposterior laxity at >2.5-year follow-up demonstrated no significant differences between techniques.
Discussion
Different bone tunnel directions in OI and TP techniques substantially affected graft-bending angle , despite similar positionings of the intra-articular apertures. Graft-bending angle with the OI technique was acute, but risk of posterior blowout of the lateral femoral condyle was decreased. Surgeons should create the femoral tunnel while considering an obtuse graft-bending angle without increasing the risk of posterior blowout.
Level of evidence
III.
This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Amis AA, Jakob RP (1998) Anterior cruciate ligament graft positioning, tensioning and twisting. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:S2–12
Bernard M, Hertel P, Hornung H, Cierpinski T (1997) Femoral insertion of the ACL: radiographic quadrant method. Am J Knee Surg 10:14–21
Chhabra A, Kline AJ, Nilles KM, Harner CD (2006) Tunnel expansion after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with autogenous hamstrings: a comparison of the medial portal and transtibial techniques. Arthroscopy 22:1107–1112
Farrow LD, Chen MR, Cooperman DR, Victoroff BN, Goodfellow DB (2007) Morphology of the femoral intercondylar notch. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2150–2155
Ferretti M, Ekdahl M, Shen W, Fu FH (2007) Osseous landmarks of the femoral attachment of the anterior cruciate ligament: an anatomic study. Arthroscopy 23:1218–1225
Fujii M, Sasaki Y, Araki D, Furumatsu T, Miyazawa S, Ozaki T, Linde-Rosen M, Smolinski P, Fu FH (2014) Evaluation of the semitendinosus tendon graft shift in the bone tunnel: an experimental study. DOI, Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. doi:10.1007/s00167-014-3461-z
Handy MH, Blessey PB, Kline AJ, Miller MD (2005) The graft/tunnel angles in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric comparison of two techniques for femoral tunnel placement. Arthroscopy 21:711–714
Hara K, Mochizuki T, Sekiya I, Yamaguchi K, Akita K, Muneta T (2009) Anatomy of normal human anterior cruciate ligament attachments evaluated by divided small bundles. Am J Sports Med 37:2386–2391
Huang TW, Wang CJ, Weng LH, Chan YS (2003) Reducing the “killer turn” in posterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 19:712–716
Kim JG, Wang JH, Ahn JH, Kim HJ, Lim HC (2013) Comparison of femoral tunnel length between transportal and retrograde reaming outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21:830–838
Kim JG, Wang JH, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Femoral graft bending angle and femoral tunnel geometry of transportal and outside-in techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: an in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography analysis. Arthroscopy 28:1682–1694
Natsu-ume T, Shino K, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Toritsuka Y, Mae T (2001) Endoscopic reconstruction of the anterior cruciate ligament with quadrupled hamstring tendons. A correlation between MRI changes and restored stability of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:834–837
Niki Y, Hakozaki A, Iwamoto W, Kanagawa H, Matsumoto H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2012) Factors affecting anterior knee pain following anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:1543–1549
Niki Y, Matsumoto H, Hakozaki A, Kanagawa H, Toyama Y, Suda Y (2011) Anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using bone-patellar tendon-bone and gracilis tendon graft: a comparative study with 2-year follow-up results of semitendinosus tendon grafts alone or semitendinosus-gracilis tendon grafts. Arthroscopy 27:1242–1251
Nishimoto K, Kuroda R, Mizuno K, Hoshino Y, Nagamune K, Kubo S, Yagi M, Yamaguchi M, Yoshiya S, Kurosaka M (2009) Analysis of the graft bending angle at the femoral tunnel aperture in anatomic double bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the transtibial and the far anteromedial portal technique. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:270–276
Otsubo H, Shino K, Nakamura N, Nakata K, Nakagawa S, Koyanagi M (2007) Arthroscopic evaluation of ACL grafts reconstructed with the anatomical two-bundle technique using hamstring tendon autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:720–728
Park JS, Park JH, Wang JH, Oh CH, Hwang MH, Lee SH, Kim JG (2015) Comparison of femoral tunnel geometry, using in vivo 3-dimensional computed tomography, during transportal and outside-in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction techniques. Arthroscopy 31:83–91
Park SH, Moon SW, Lee BH, Chae SH, Ahn JH, Chang M, Wang JH (2015) The sagittal plane angle and tunnel-related complications in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using the transportal technique: an in vivo imaging study. Arthroscopy 31:283–292
Segawa H, Koga Y, Omori G, Sakamoto M, Hara T (2003) Influence of the femoral tunnel location and angle on the contact pressure in the femoral tunnel in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 31:444–448
Segawa H, Omori G, Tomita S, Koga Y (2001) Bone tunnel enlargement after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using hamstring tendons. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:206–210
Tei K, Ishida K, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Sasaki H, Shibanuma N, Akisue T, Nishida K, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2012) Novel image-matching software for postoperative evaluation after TKA. Orthopedics 35:e1711–e1715
Toritsuka Y, Shino K, Horibe S, Mitsuoka T, Hamada M, Nakata K, Nakamura N, Yoshikawa H (2004) Second-look arthroscopy of anterior cruciate ligament grafts with multistranded hamstring tendons. Arthroscopy 20:287–293
Wang JH, Kim JG, Lee DK, Lim HC, Ahn JH (2012) Comparison of femoral graft bending angle and tunnel length between transtibial technique and transportal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20(8):1584–1593
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Niki, Y., Nagai, K., Harato, K. et al. Effects of femoral bone tunnel characteristics on graft-bending angle in double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a comparison of the outside-in and transportal techniques. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 1191–1198 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3761-y
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3761-y