Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The clinical outcomes of transtibial (TT) and anteromedial (AM) drilling techniques for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in preparing the femoral tunnel were directly compared by using a systematic literature review.

Methods

PubMed, EMBASE, the Cochrane Library, and the ISI Web of Science were searched until 10 May 2014, using the following Boolean operators: transtibial AND (anteromedial OR transportal OR independent OR three portal OR accessory portal) AND anterior cruciate ligament. All prospective and retrospective controlled trials directly comparing physical examination and scoring system results between TT and AM techniques were retrieved. No language or publication year limitations were used in our analysis.

Results

Of 504 studies retrieved, nine studies involving 769 patients were included. Results suggested that the AM was superior to the TT technique for preparing the femoral tunnel independent of the International Knee Documentation Committee (IKDC) Score (n.s.). A higher proportion of negative Lachman (p = 0.002) and pivot-shift test (p = 0.01) results, lower manual maximum displacement by KT-1000 (p = 0.004), higher Lysholm scores (p = 0.034), a higher incidence of IKDC grade A/B (p = 0.04), and higher visual analogue scale scores (p = 0.00) were observed with the AM compared with the TT technique.

Conclusion

Although the increases in these scores were below the minimal clinically important difference, this systematic review indicated that the AM was superior to the TT drilling technique based on physical examination and scoring system results.

Level of evidence

Therapeutic study (systematic review), Level III.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Alentorn-Geli E, Lajara F, Samitier G, Cugat R (2010) The transtibial versus the anteromedial portal technique in the arthroscopic bone-patellar tendon-bone anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1013–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Alentorn-Geli E, Samitier G, Alvarez P, Steinbacher G, Cugat R (2010) Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in ACL reconstruction: a blinded cross-sectional study at two- to five-year follow-up. Int Orthop 34:747–754

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  3. Atkins D, Best D, Briss PA, Eccles M, Falck-Ytter Y, Flottorp S, Guyatt GH, Harbour RT, Haugh MC, Henry D, Hill S, Jaeschke R, Leng G, Liberati A, Magrini N, Mason J, Middleton P, Mrukowicz J, O’Connell D, Oxman AD, Phillips B, Schunemann HJ, Edejer T, Varonen H, Vist GE, Williams JW Jr, Zaza S, Group GW (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Azboy I, Demirtas A, Gem M, Kiran S, Alemdar C, Bulut M (2014) A comparison of the anteromedial and transtibial drilling technique in ACL reconstruction after a short-term follow-up. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 134:963–969

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Bedi A, Raphael B, Maderazo A, Pavlov H, Williams RJ 3rd (2010) Transtibial versus anteromedial portal drilling for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a cadaveric study of femoral tunnel length and obliquity. Arthroscopy 26:342–350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Chalmers PN, Mall NA, Cole BJ, Verma NN, Bush-Joseph CA, Bach BR Jr (2013) Anteromedial versus transtibial tunnel drilling in anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions: a systematic review. Arthroscopy 29:1235–1242

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chechik O, Amar E, Khashan M, Lador R, Eyal G, Gold A (2013) An international survey on anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction practices. Int Orthop 37:201–206

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chuang LH, Garratt A, Brealey S (2013) Comparative responsiveness and minimal change of the Knee Quality of Life 26-item (KQoL-26) questionnaire. Qual Life Res 22:2461–2475

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Csintalan RP, Inacio MC, Funahashi TT (2008) Incidence rate of anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Perm J 12:17–21

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  10. Duquin TR, Wind WM, Fineberg MS, Smolinski RJ, Buyea CM (2009) Current trends in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Knee Surg 22:7–12

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Franceschi F, Papalia R, Rizzello G, Del Buono A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2013) Anteromedial portal versus transtibial drilling techniques in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Any clinical relevance? A retrospective comparative study. Arthroscopy 29:1330–1337

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Furlan AD, Pennick V, Bombardier C, van Tulder M, Editorial Board CBRG (2009) 2009 updated method guidelines for systematic reviews in the Cochrane Back Review Group. Spine (Phila Pa 1976) 34:1929–1941

    Article  Google Scholar 

  13. Greco NJ, Anderson AF, Mann BJ, Cole BJ, Farr J, Nissen CW, Irrgang JJ (2010) Responsiveness of the International Knee Documentation Committee Subjective Knee Form in comparison to the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index, modified Cincinnati Knee Rating System, and Short Form 36 in patients with focal articular cartilage defects. Am J Sports Med 38:891–902

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Liantsis A, Venouziou A, Karantanas AH, Malizos KN (2009) Differences in graft orientation using the transtibial and anteromedial portal technique in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a magnetic resonance imaging study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:880–886

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Hussein M, van Eck CF, Cretnik A, Dinevski D, Fu FH (2012) Prospective randomized clinical evaluation of conventional single-bundle, anatomic single-bundle, and anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: 281 cases with 3- to 5-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 40:512–520

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Kim MK, Lee BC, Park JH (2011) Anatomic single bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction by the two anteromedial portal method: the comparison of transportal and transtibial techniques. Knee Surg Relat Res 23:213–219

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  18. Kopf S, Forsythe B, Wong AK, Tashman S, Irrgang JJ, Fu FH (2012) Transtibial ACL reconstruction technique fails to position drill tunnels anatomically in vivo 3D CT study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:2200–2207

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Lee JK, Lee S, Seong SC, Lee MC (2014) Anatomic single-bundle ACL reconstruction is possible with use of the modified transtibial technique: a comparison with the anteromedial transportal technique. J Bone Joint Surg Am 96:664–672

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Lee MC, Seong SC, Lee S, Chang CB, Park YK, Jo H, Kim CH (2007) Vertical femoral tunnel placement results in rotational knee laxity after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 23:771–778

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Loh JC, Fukuda Y, Tsuda E, Steadman RJ, Fu FH, Woo SL (2003) Knee stability and graft function following anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: comparison between 11 o’clock and 10 o’clock femoral tunnel placement. 2002 Richard O’Connor Award paper. Arthroscopy 19:297–304

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Mahnik A, Mahnik S, Dimnjakovic D, Curic S, Smoljanovic T, Bojanic I (2013) Current practice variations in the management of anterior cruciate ligament injuries in Croatia. World J Orthop 4:309–315

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  23. Marchant BG, Noyes FR, Barber-Westin SD, Fleckenstein C (2010) Prevalence of nonanatomical graft placement in a series of failed anterior cruciate ligament reconstructions. Am J Sports Med 38:1987–1996

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Mardani-Kivi M, Madadi F, Keyhani S, Karimi-Mobarake M, Hashemi-Motlagh K, Saheb-Ekhtiari K (2012) Antero-medial portal vs. transtibial techniques for drilling femoral tunnel in ACL reconstruction using 4-strand hamstring tendon: a cross-sectional study with 1-year follow-up. Med Sci Monit 18:CR674–CR679

    Article  PubMed  PubMed Central  Google Scholar 

  25. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG, Group P (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. Ann Intern Med 151:264–269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Noh JH, Roh YH, Yang BG, Yi SR, Lee SY (2013) Femoral tunnel position on conventional magnetic resonance imaging after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction in young men: transtibial technique versus anteromedial portal technique. Arthroscopy 29:882–890

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Piasecki DP, Bach BR Jr, Espinoza Orias AA, Verma NN (2011) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Can anatomic femoral placement be achieved with a transtibial technique? Am J Sports Med 39:1306–1315

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Steiner ME, Murray MM, Rodeo SA (2008) Strategies to improve anterior cruciate ligament healing and graft placement. Am J Sports Med 36:176–189

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Strauss EJ, Barker JU, McGill K, Cole BJ, Bach BR Jr, Verma NN (2011) Can anatomic femoral tunnel placement be achieved using a transtibial technique for hamstring anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction? Am J Sports Med 39:1263–1269

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Tashjian RZ, Deloach J, Porucznik CA, Powell AP (2009) Minimal clinically important differences (MCID) and patient acceptable symptomatic state (PASS) for visual analog scales (VAS) measuring pain in patients treated for rotator cuff disease. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:927–932

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Zhang Q, Zhang S, Li R, Liu Y, Cao X (2012) Comparison of two methods of femoral tunnel preparation in single-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: a prospective randomized study. Acta Cir Bras 27:572–576

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (81171687).

Conflict of interest

There was no conflict of interest existing for any author in our research.

Author information

Author notes

    Authors and Affiliations

    1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

      An Liu, Chiyuan Ma, Yunlin Chen, Xinghe Xue, Peng Guo, Zhongli Shi & Shigui Yan

    2. Department of Oral and Maxillofacial Surgery, Second Affiliated Hospital, School of Medicine, Zhejiang University, Hangzhou, China

      Miao Sun

    Authors
    1. An Liu
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    2. Miao Sun
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    3. Chiyuan Ma
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    4. Yunlin Chen
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    5. Xinghe Xue
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    6. Peng Guo
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    7. Zhongli Shi
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    8. Shigui Yan
      View author publications

      You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

    Corresponding author

    Correspondence to Shigui Yan.

    Additional information

    An Liu and Miao Sun are co-first authors and they contributed equally to the work.

    Rights and permissions

    Reprints and permissions

    About this article

    Check for updates. Verify currency and authenticity via CrossMark

    Cite this article

    Liu, A., Sun, M., Ma, C. et al. Clinical outcomes of transtibial versus anteromedial drilling techniques to prepare the femoral tunnel during anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 25, 2751–2759 (2017). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3672-y

    Download citation

    • Received:

    • Accepted:

    • Published:

    • Issue Date:

    • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-015-3672-y

    Keywords

    Search

    Navigation