Abstract
Purpose
Well-designed validity studies on the clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) injury are scarce. Our purpose is to assess the diagnostic value of ACL-specific medical history assessment and physical examination between primary and secondary care medical specialists.
Methods
Medical history assessment and physical examination were performed by both an orthopaedic surgeon and a primary care physician, both blinded to all clinical information, in a secondary care population. A knee arthroscopy was used as reference standard. A total of 60 participants were divided into an index group with an arthroscopically proven complete ACL rupture and a control group with an arthroscopically proven intact ACL.
Results
The orthopaedic surgeon recognized 94 % of the participants with an ACL rupture through a positive medical history combined with a positive physical examination; of the participants with an intact ACL, 16 % were misclassified by the orthopaedic surgeon. The primary care physician recognized 62 % of the participants with an ACL rupture and misclassified 23 % of the participants with an intact ACL. Physical examination appeared to have no additional value for the primary care physician.
Conclusions
Combined medical history and physical examination have strong diagnostic value in ACL rupture diagnostics performed by an orthopaedic surgeon, whereas for the primary care physician, only medical history appeared to be of value. For current practice, this could mean that only orthopaedic surgeons can perform an ACL physical examination with accuracy.
Level of evidence
III.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benjaminse A, Gokeler A, van der Schans CP (2006) Clinical diagnosis of an anterior cruciate ligament rupture: a meta-analysis. J Orthop Sports Phys Ther 36:267–288
Bollen SR, Scott BW (1996) Rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament–a quiet epidemic? Injury 27:407–409
Cooperman JM, Riddle DL, Rothstein JM (1990) Reliability and validity of judgments of the integrity of the anterior cruciate ligament of the knee using the Lachman’s test. Phys Ther 70:225–233
Galway HR, MacIntosh DL (1980) The lateral pivot shift: a symptom and sign of anterior cruciate ligament insufficiency. Clin Orthop Relat Res 147:45–50
Guillodo Y, Rannou N, Dubrana F, Lefevre C, Saraux A (2008) Diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament rupture in an emergency department. J Trauma 65:1078–1082
Hartnett N, Tregonning RJ (2001) Delay in diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament injury in sport. N Z Med J 114:11–13
Hefti F, Muller W, Jakob RP, Staubli HU (1993) Evaluation of knee ligament injuries with the IKDC form. Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 1:226–234
Kocabey Y, Tetik O, Isbell WM, Atay OA, Johnson DL (2004) The value of clinical examination versus magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal tears and anterior cruciate ligament rupture. Arthroscopy 20:696–700
Kocher MS, DiCanzio J, Zurakowski D, Micheli LJ (2001) Diagnostic performance of clinical examination and selective magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of intraarticular knee disorders in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 29:292–296
Malanga GA, Andrus S, Nadler SF, McLean J (2003) Physical examination of the knee: a review of the original test description and scientific validity of common orthopedic tests. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 84:592–603
Meuffels DE, Poldervaart MT, Diercks RL, Fievez AW, Patt TW, Hart CP, Hammacher ER, Meer F, Goedhart EA, Lenssen AF, Muller-Ploeger SB, Pols MA, Saris DB (2012) Guideline on anterior cruciate ligament injury. Acta Orthop 83:379–386
Rose NE, Gold SM (1996) A comparison of accuracy between clinical examination and magnetic resonance imaging in the diagnosis of meniscal and anterior cruciate ligament tears. Arthroscopy 12:398–405
Sarraf KM, Sadri A, Thevendran G, Vedi V (2010) Approaching the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament. Emerg Med J 28:644–649
Scholten RJ, Opstelten W, van der Plas CG, Bijl D, Deville WL, Bouter LM (2003) Accuracy of physical diagnostic tests for assessing ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament: a meta-analysis. J Fam Pract 52:689–694
Solomon DH, Simel DL, Bates DW, Katz JN, Schaffer JL (2001) The rational clinical examination. Does this patient have a torn meniscus or ligament of the knee? Value of the physical examination. JAMA 286:1610–1620
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49
Torg JS, Conrad W, Kalen V (1976) Clinical diagnosis of anterior cruciate ligament instability in the athlete. Am J Sports Med 4:84–93
Wagemakers HP, Luijsterburg PA, Boks SS, Heintjes EM, Berger MY, Verhaar JA, Koes BW, Bierma-Zeinstra SM (2010) Diagnostic accuracy of history taking and physical examination for assessing anterior cruciate ligament lesions of the knee in primary care. Arch Phys Med Rehabil 91:1452–1459
Conflict of interest
The authors declare that they have no conflict of interests
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Appendix: Specific ACL medical history form (translated back from the Dutch questionnaire)
Appendix: Specific ACL medical history form (translated back from the Dutch questionnaire)
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Geraets, S.E.W., Meuffels, D.E., van Meer, B.L. et al. Diagnostic value of medical history and physical examination of anterior cruciate ligament injury: comparison between primary care physician and orthopaedic surgeon. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 968–974 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2769-4
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2769-4