Skip to main content
Log in

Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The purpose of this study was to introduce a novel surgical technique for simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft and to compare its biomechanical characteristics to those of a coracoid cerclage reconstruction of the coracoclavicular ligaments.

Methods

Six matched pairs of human acromioclavicular joints with an average age of 54.8 ± 7.8 years were used. One shoulder from each pair received the single tendon acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction; the contralateral shoulder received the coracoid cerclage reconstruction. Bovine extensor tendon was used for both techniques. The single tendon acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction technique provided anatomic restoration of the two coracoclavicular ligaments and the superior and inferior acromioclavicular ligaments simultaneously using one coracoid hole, one acromion hole, and two clavicular holes with interference screws. Anterior–posterior and superior–inferior translations were quantified for all specimens before and after reconstruction, followed by load to failure testing.

Results

Following coracoid cerclage reconstruction, total anterior–posterior translation was significantly greater than intact (10.0 ± 5.7 mm; p = 0.008). Following single tendon acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction, there was no significant difference in anterior–posterior translation compared to intact (−1.6 ± 2.2 mm; n.s.). The coracoid cerclage technique demonstrated significantly greater anterior–posterior translation than the single tendon acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular technique (p = 0.007). Both techniques restored superior–inferior translation to the intact condition (n.s.). Ultimate load, deformation at ultimate load, and energy absorbed at ultimate load were significantly greater after acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction than after coracoid cerclage reconstruction (p < 0.05).

Conclusions

This novel single tendon anatomic acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction provided greater stability and stronger load to failure characteristics than the isolated coracoid cerclage reconstruction. A simultaneous acromioclavicular–coracoclavicular reconstruction technique using a single free tendon graft provided anatomic reconstruction of the conoid, trapezoid, and superior and inferior acromioclavicular ligaments and may reduce postoperative subluxation.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abrams GD, McGarry MH, Jain NS, Freehill MT, Shin SJ, Cheung EV, Lee TQ, Safran MR (2013) Biomechanical evaluation of a coracoclavicular and acromioclacicular ligament reconstruction technique utilizing a single continuous intramedullary free tendon graft. J Should Elbow Surg. doi:10.1016/j.jse.2012.09.013

    Google Scholar 

  2. Carofino BC, Mazzocca AD (2010) The anatomic coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction: surgical technique and indications. J Should Elbow Surg 19(2 Suppl):37–46

    Article  Google Scholar 

  3. Dawson PA, Adamson GJ, Pink MM, Kornswiet M, Lin S, Shankwiler JA, Lee TQ (2009) Relative contribution of acromioclavicular joint capsule and coracoclavicular ligaments to acromioclavicular stability. J Should Elbow Surg 18(2):237–244

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Debski RE, Parsons IMt, Woo SL, Fu FH (2001) Effect of capsular injury on acromioclavicular joint mechanics. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83-A(9):1344–1351

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Dimakopoulos P, Panagopoulos A, Syggelos SA, Panagiotopoulos E, Lambiris E (2006) Double-loop suture repair for acute acromioclavicular joint disruption. Am J Sports Med 34(7):1112–1119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Freedman JA, Adamson GJ, Bui C, Lee TQ (2010) Biomechanical evaluation of the acromioclavicular capsular ligaments and reconstruction with an intramedullary free tissue graft. Am J Sports Med 38(5):958–964

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Fukuda K, Craig EV, An KN, Cofield RH, Chao EY (1986) Biomechanical study of the ligamentous system of the acromioclavicular joint. J Bone Joint Surg Am 68(3):434–440

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Grutter PW, Petersen SA (2005) Anatomical acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction: a biomechanical comparison of reconstructive techniques of the acromioclavicular joint. Am J Sports Med 33(11):1723–1728

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Huang TW, Hsieh PH, Huang KC, Huang KC (2009) Suspension suture augmentation for repair of coracoclavicular ligament disruptions. Clin Orthop Relat Res 467:2142–2148

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ladermann A, Grosclaude M, Lubbeke A, Christofilopoulos P, Stern R, Rod T, Hoffmeyer P (2011) Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular cerclage reconstruction for acute acromioclavicular joint dislocations. J Should Elbow Surg 20(3):401–408

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Lee SJ, Keefer EP, McHugh MP, Kremenic IJ, Orishimo KF, Ben-Avi S, Nicholas SJ (2008) Cyclical loading of coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions: a comparative biomechanical study. Am J Sports Med 36(10):1990–1997

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Lewicky YM, Robertson CM, Foran JR (2010) Anatomic coracoclavicular and acromioclavicular ligament reconstruction for high-grade acromioclavicular separations: the gracilis weave. Orthopedics 33(3):166–171

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Martetschlager F, Buchholz A, Sandmann G, Siebenlist S, Dobele S, Hapfelmeier A, Stockle U, Millett PJ, Elser F, Lenich A (2013) Acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular PDS augmentation for complete AC joint dislocation showed insufficient properties in a cadaver model. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21(2):438–444

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Mazzocca AD, Arciero RA, Bicos J (2007) Evaluation and treatment of acromioclavicular joint injuries. Am J Sports Med 35(2):316–329

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Michlitsch MG, Adamson GJ, Pink M, Estess A, Shankwiler JA, Lee TQ (2010) Biomechanical comparison of a modified Weaver-Dunn and a free-tissue graft reconstruction of the acromioclavicular joint complex. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1196–1203

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. Nicholas SJ, Lee SJ, Mullaney MJ, Tyler TF, McHugh MP (2007) Clinical outcomes of coracoclavicular ligament reconstructions using tendon grafts. Am J Sports Med 35(11):1912–1917

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Remia LF, Ravalin RV, Lemly KS, McGarry MH, Kvitne RS, Lee TQ (2003) Biomechanical evaluation of multidirectional glenohumeral instability and repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 416:225–236

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Salzmann GM, Walz L, Buchmann S, Glabgly P, Venjakob A, Imhoff AB (2010) Arthroscopically assisted 2-bundle anatomical reduction of acute acromioclavicular joint separations. Am J Sports Med 38(6):1179–1187

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Shin SJ, Yun YH, Yoo JD (2009) Coracoclavicular ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular dislocation using 2 suture anchors and coracoacromial ligament transfer. Am J Sports Med 37(2):346–351

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Shu B, Johnston T, Lindsey DP, McAdams TR (2012) Biomechanical evaluation of a novel reverse coracoacromial ligament reconstruction for acromioclavicular joint separation. Am J Sports Med 40(2):440–446

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Sobhy MH, Mahran MA, Kamel EM (2012) Midterm results of combined patellofemoral and patellotibial ligaments reconstruction in recurrent patellar dislocation. Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol (Epub ahead of print)

  22. Thomas K, Litsky A, Jones G, Bishop JY (2011) Biomechanical comparison of coracoclavicular reconstructive techniques. Am J Sports Med 39(4):804–810

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

Funding provided in part by VA Rehab R&D and Merit Review.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Thay Q. Lee.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Shin, SJ., Campbell, S., Scott, J. et al. Simultaneous anatomic reconstruction of the acromioclavicular and coracoclavicular ligaments using a single tendon graft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 2216–2222 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2569-x

Keywords

Navigation