Abstract
Purpose
The aims of this study were to assess the healing rate of repair of chronically torn meniscal tear with MR-arthrography and to evaluate the relationship between the clinical and the radiographic outcomes and the impact of the meniscal section on healing.
Methods
MR-arthrography was performed at a median of 10.5 months (range 6–55) after surgery in 28 patients and healing assessed using Henning’s criteria. All lesions were chronic (>3 months). Repairs were carried out at a median 14 months (range 6–80) from initial diagnosis. Eleven patients (39 %) had ACL ligament reconstruction as well. All lesions were located in the red or red–white zone. Patients were followed for a median of 18.5 months (range 8–68). Functional outcomes were evaluated using Barrett’s healing criteria, Lysholm and Tegner score pre- and postoperatively.
Results
Clinical healing of the lesion according to Barrett’s criteria was achieved in 24 patients (85.7 %). Both Lysholm and Tegner scores improved significantly after the surgery (p < 0.05). According to Henning’s criteria, 15 of the menisci healed completely (53.5 %), 10 partially (35.7 %) and 3 failed (10.8 %). There was no significant difference between the healing process in the posterior horn and the body of the meniscus (n.s.). No correlation was found between the healing results and the clinical scores. ACL reconstruction did not influence the healing process (n.s.). Patients waiting more than 1 year from lesion to surgery seem to have a higher rate of failure (p = 0.02).
Conclusions
The results found suggest good short-term clinical and anatomic outcomes post-repair of meniscal lesions, despite their chronic nature. Longer waiting times may have negative effects on the healing process. Partial healing occurred often, but the meniscus was painless and stable.
Level of evidence
Retrospective case series, Level IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Ahn JH, Wang JH, Yoo JC (2004) Arthroscopic all-inside suture repair of medial meniscus lesion in anterior cruciate ligament-deficient knees: results of second-look arthroscopies in 39 cases. Arthroscopy 20:936–945
Arnoczky SP, Cooper TG, Stadelmaier DM, Hannafin JA (1994) Magnetic resonance signals in healing menisci: an experimental study in dogs. Arthroscopy 10:552–557
Barrett GR, Field MH, Treacy SH, Ruff CG (1998) Clinical results of meniscus repair in patients 40 years and older. Arthroscopy 14:824–829
Billante M, Diduch DR, Lunardini DJ et al (2008) Meniscal repair using an all-inside, rapidly absorbing, tensionable device. Arthroscopy 24(7):779–785
Cannon WD Jr, Vittori JM (1992) The incidence of healing in arthroscopic meniscal repairs in anterior cruciate ligament-reconstructed knees versus stable knees. Am J Sports Med 20:176–181
Cardello P, Gigli C, Ricci A et al (2009) Retears of postoperative knee meniscus: findings on magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) and magnetic resonance arthrography (MRA) by using low and high field magnets. Skeletal Radiol 38(2):149–156
Davis KW, Tuite MJ (2002) MR imaging of the postoperative meniscus of the knee. Semin Musculoskelet Radiol 6:35–45
DeHaven KE, Lohrer WA, Lovelock JE (1995) Long-term results of open meniscal repair. Am J Sports Med 23:524–530
Eggli S, Wegmuller H, Kosina J, Huckell C, Jakob RP (1995) Long-term results of arthroscopic meniscal repair: an analysis of isolated tears. Am J Sports Med 23:715–720
Fairbank TJ (1948) Knee joint changes after meniscectomy. J Bone Joint Surg Br 30:664–670
Farley TE, Howell SM, Love KF, Wolfe RD, Neumann CH (1991) Meniscal tears: MR and arthrographic findings after arthroscopic repair. Radiology 180:517–522
Feng H, Hong l, Geng X et al (2008) Second-look arthroscopic evaluation of bucket-handle meniscus tear repairs with ACL reconstruction: 67 consecutive cases. Arthroscopy 24(12):1358–1366
Gill SS, Diduch DR (2002) Outcomes after meniscal repair using the meniscus arrow in knees undergoing concurrent anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Arthroscopy 18(6):569–577
Hantes ME, Zachos VC, Zibis AH et al (2004) Evaluation of meniscal repair with serial magnetic resonance imaging: a comparative study between conventional MRI and indirect MR arthrography. Eur J Radiol 50:231–237
Henning CE, Lynch MA, Clark JR (1987) Vascularity for healing of meniscus repairs. Arthroscopy 3:13–18
Horibe S, Shino K, Maeda A et al (1996) Results of isolated meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 12:150–155
Horibe S, Shino K, Nakata K et al (1995) Second-look arthroscopy after meniscal repair: review of 132 menisci repaired by an arthroscopic inside-out technique. J Bone Joint Surg Br 77:245–249
Johnson MJ, Lucas GL, Dusek JK, Henning CE (1999) Isolated arthroscopic meniscal repair: a long-term outcome study (more than 10 years). Am J Sports Med 27:44–49
Kotsovolos ES, Hantes M, Mastrokalos DS et al (2006) Results of all-inside meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix meniscal repair system. Arthroscopy 22(1):3–9
Kurosaka M, Yoshiya S, Kuroda R et al (2002) Repeat tears of repaired menisci after arthroscopic confirmation of healing. J Bone Joint Surg (Br) 84-B:34–37
Lozano J, Ma CB, Cannon WD (2007) All-inside meniscus repair. Clin Orthop Relat Res 45:134–141
Magee T, Shapiro M, Rodriguez J, Williams D (2003) MR arthrography of postop- erative knee: for which patients is it useful? Radiology 229:159–163
Mathieu L, Bouchard A, Marchaland JP et al (2009) Knee MR-arthrography in assessment of meniscal and chondral lesions. Orthop Traumatol Surg Res 95(1):40–47
Morgan CD, Wojtys EM, Casscells CD, Casscells SW (1991) Arthroscopic meniscal repair evaluated by second-look arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 19:632–637
Nepple JJ, Dunn WR, Wright RW (2012) Meniscal repair outcomes at greater than five years: a systematic literature review and meta-analysis. J Bone Joint Surg Am 94(24):2222–2227
Petty CA, Lubowitz JH (2011) Does arthroscopic partial meniscectomy result in knee osteoarthritis? A systematic review with a minimum of 8 years’ follow-up. Arthroscopy 27(3):419–424
Ponce de Leon JC, Sierra Suarez L, Almazán Díaz A et al (2008) Meniscal repair in patients with chronic lesions. Acta Ortop Mex 22(1):12–18
Popescu D, Sastre S, Caballero M et al (2010) Meniscal repair using the FasT-Fix device in patients with chronic meniscal lesions. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18(4):546–550
Pujol N, Panarella L, Si Selmi TA (2008) Meniscal healing after meniscal repair. A CT arthrography assessment. Am J Sports Med 36(8):1489–1495
Rockborn P, Messner K (2000) Long-term results of meniscus repair and meniscectomy: a 13-year functional and radiographic follow-up study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:2–10
Starke C, Kopf S, Petersen W, Becker R (2009) Current concepts: meniscal repair. Arthroscopy 25(9):1033–1044
Tachibana Y, Sakaguchi K, Goto T et al (2010) Repair integrity evaluated by second-look arthroscopy after arthroscopic meniscal repair with the FasT-Fix during ACL reconstruction. Am J Sports Med 38(5):965–971
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of the knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49
Toms AP, White LM, Marshall TJ, Donell ST (2005) Imaging the post-operative meniscus. Eur J Radiol 54(2):189–198
Totty WG, Matava MJ (2000) Imaging the postoperative meniscus. Magn Reson Imaging Clin N Am 8:271–283
Trattnig S, Rand T, Czerny C et al (1999) Magnetic resonance imaging of the postoperative knee. Top Magn Reson Imaging 10:221–236
Van Trommel MF, Simonian PT, Potter HG, Wickiewicz TL (1998) Different regional healing rates with the outside-in technique for meniscal repair. Am J Sport Med 26(3):446–452
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Popescu, D., Sastre, S., Garcia, A.I. et al. MR-arthrography assessment after repair of chronic meniscal tears. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 23, 171–177 (2015). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2552-6
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2552-6