Skip to main content
Log in

Revision hip arthroscopic surgery: outcome at three years

  • Hip
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

This study describes the medium-term results of revision hip arthroscopy.

Methods

Patients with persistent hip pain and a positive impingement sign were considered for revision surgery after the exclusion of other causes of groin pain. Seventy-four consecutive patients were prospectively assessed using the modified Harris hip score for a period of 3 years after surgery. Of the 74 patients, 11 had inadequate follow-up data; thus, a total of 63 patients were qualified for the study. The mean age at index surgery was 37 years, comprising 27 males and 36 females.

Results

Revision surgery was performed at a mean of 3 years from index surgery. Chondral lesion associated with labral re-injury was the most common finding at revision arthroscopy. In contrast to other authors, however, only 31 % of our patients underwent revision for persistent femoroacetabular impingement. The mean pre-operative mHHS for all 63 patients was 54 (SD 14.5). The mean post-operative mHHS was 53 (SD 14.9) at 6 weeks, 62 (SD 17.5) at 6 months, 63 (SD 16.5) at 1 year, 64 (SD 16.5) at 2 years and 59 (SD 16.5) at 3 years (p = n.s., 0.02, 0.045, 0.039 and n.s., respectively).

Conclusions

Revision arthroscopy results in improvement in outcome in the first 3 years after revision surgery with a success rate of 63.4 % at 1 year, falling to 55.6 % by 3 years.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Aprato A, Jayasekera N, Villar RN (2012) Does the modified Harris hip score reflect patient satisfaction after hip arthroscopy? Am J Sports Med 40:2557–2560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bardakos NV, Vasconcelos JC, Villar RN (2008) Early outcome of hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: the role of femoral osteoplasty in symptomatic improvement. J Bone Joint Surg [Br] 90:1570–1575

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Bedi A, Chen N, Robertson W, Kelly BT (2008) The management of labral tears and femoroacetabular impingement of the hip in the young, active patient. Arthroscopy 24:1135–1145

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Botser IB, Smith TW Jr, Nasser R, Domb BG (2011) Open surgical dislocation versus arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement: a comparison of clinical outcomes. Arthroscopy 27:270–278

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Byrd JW, Jones KS (2011) Arthroscopic management of femoroacetabular impingement: minimum 2-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 27:1379–1388

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Byrd JWT, Jones KS (2000) Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with two year follow-up. Arthroscopy 16:578–587

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Egerton T, Hinman RS, Takla A, Bennell KL, O’Donnell J (2012) Intraoperative cartilage degeneration predicts outcome 12 months after hip arthroscopy. Clin Orthop Relat Res. doi:10.1007/s11999-012-2594-y

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Heyworth BE, Shindle MK, Voos JE, Rudzki JR, Kelly BT (2007) Radiologic and intraoperative findings in revision hip arthroscopy. Arthroscopy 23:1295–1302

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Kemp JL, Collins NJ, Makdissi M, Schache AG, Machotka Z, Crossley K (2012) Hip arthroscopy for intra-articular pathology: a systematic review of outcomes with and without femoral osteoplasty. Br J Sports Med 46(9):632–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Larson CM, Giveans MR (2008) Arthroscopic management of femoro-acetabular impingement: early outcomes measures. Arthroscopy 24:540–546

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Lodhia P, Slobogean GP, Noonan VK, Gilbart MK (2011) Patient-reported outcome instruments for femoroacetabular impingement and hip labral pathology: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Arthroscopy 27:279–286

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Malviya A, Stafford GH, Villar RN (2012) Is hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement only for athletes? Br J Sports Med 46:1016–1018

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. McCarthy JC, Lee JA (2004) Arthroscopic intervention in early hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:157–162

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Murray D (1993) The hip. In: Pynsent D, Fairbank J, Carr A (eds) Outcome measurements in orthopaedics. Butterworth-Heinemann, Oxford, pp 198–227

    Google Scholar 

  15. Outerbridge R (1961) The etiology of chondromalacia patellae. J Bone Joint Surg[Br] 43B:752–757

    Google Scholar 

  16. Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA (2009) Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:16–23

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Philippon MJ, Schenker ML, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB, Stubbs AJ (2007) Revision hip arthroscopy. Am J Sports Med 35:1918–1921

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Stevens MS, Legay DA, Glazebrook MA, Amirault D (2010) The evidence for hip arthroscopy: grading the current indications. Arthroscopy 26:1370–1383

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ward JP, Rogers P, Youm T (2012) Failed hip arthroscopy: causes and treatment options. Orthopedics 35:612–617

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Alessandro Aprato.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Aprato, A., Jayasekera, N. & Villar, R.N. Revision hip arthroscopic surgery: outcome at three years. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 932–937 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2373-7

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-013-2373-7

Keywords

Navigation