Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

To compare the outcomes between posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty (TKA) in order to evaluate which approach is superior.

Methods

Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) comparing posterior cruciate-retaining with posterior stabilized TKA were reviewed which were published up to August 2011. Methodological quality of each included RCT was assessed using the Physiotherapy Evidence Database (PEDro) scale. The relevant data were analysed using Review Manager 5.1. The Grading of Recommendations Assessment, Development and Evaluation (GRADE) approach was used to determine the quality of the evidence.

Results

Eight RCTs involving 888 patients with 963 knee joints met predetermined inclusion criteria. The postoperative range of motion (ROM) and flexion angle were 11.07° and 2.88° higher for patients with a posterior stabilized TKA than those with a posterior cruciate-retaining TKA, respectively [weighted mean difference (WMD), −11.07; 95 % confidence interval (CI), −18.06 to −4.08; p < 0.01 and WMD, −2.88; 95 % CI, −5.63 to −0.12; p = 0.04]. No statistical differences were observed between the two designs for knee society pain score, extension angle, 2- and 5-year knee society score, 2- and 5-year knee society function score and complications after primary TKA.

Conclusion

Posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA have similar clinical outcomes with regard to knee function, postoperative knee pain and the other complications. Prosthesis survivorship for both posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized TKA is satisfactory, and there are no differences between them at short- and middle-term follow-up.

Level of evidence

II.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3
Fig. 4
Fig. 5
Fig. 6

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Abdel MP, Morrey ME, Jensen MR, Morrey BF (2011) Increased long-term survival of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-stabilizing total knee replacements. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93:2072–2078

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Aglietti P, Baldini A, Buzzi R, Lup D, De Luca L (2005) Comparison of mobile-bearing and fixed-bearing total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized study. J Arthroplasty 20:145–153

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. GRADE Working Group (2004) Grading quality of evidence and strength of recommendations. BMJ 328:1490

    Article  Google Scholar 

  4. Banks SA, Hodge WA (2004) 2003 Hap Paul Award Paper of the International Society for Technology in Arthroplasty. Design and activity dependence of kinematics in fixed and mobile-bearing knee arthroplasties. J Arthroplasty 19:809–816

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Buehler KO, Venn-Watson E, D’Lima DD, Colwell CW Jr (2000) The press-fit condylar total knee system: 8–10 year results with a posterior cruciate-retaining design. J Arthroplasty 15:698–701

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Catani F, Leardini A, Ensini A, Cucca G, Bragonzoni L, Toksvig-Larsen S, Giannini S (2004) The stability of the cemented tibial component of total knee arthroplasty: posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized design. J Arthroplasty 19:775–782

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Chalidis BE, Sachinis NP, Papadopoulos P, Petsatodis E, Christodoulou AG, Petsatodis G (2011) Long-term results of posterior-cruciate-retaining Genesis I total knee arthroplasty. J Orthop Sci 16:726–731

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Chaudhary R, Beaupre LA, Johnston DW (2008) Knee range of motion during the first two years after use of posterior cruciate-stabilizing or posterior cruciate-retaining total knee prostheses. A randomized clinical trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:2579–2586

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Chouteau J, Lerat JL, Testa R, Moyen B, Banks SA (2009) Sagittal laxity after posterior cruciate ligament-retaining mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:710–715

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. de Morton NA (2009) The PEDro scale is a valid measure of the methodological quality of clinical trials: a demographic study. Aust J Physiother 55:129–133

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Gill GS, Joshi AB (2001) Long-term results of kinematic condylar knee replacement. An analysis of 404 knees. J Bone Joint Surg Br 83:355–358

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  12. Harato K, Bourne RB, Victor J, Snyder M, Hart J, Ries MD (2008) Midterm comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus-substituting total knee arthroplasty using the Genesis II prosthesis. A multicenter prospective randomized clinical trial. Knee 15:217–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Heyse TJ, Becher C, Kron N, Ostermeier S, Hurschler C, Schofer MD, Tibesku CO, Fuchs-Winkelmann S (2010) Patellofemoral pressure after TKA in vitro: highly conforming versus posterior stabilized inlays. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 130:191–196

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  14. Higgins JP, Thompson SG, Deeks JJ, Altman DG (2003) Measuring inconsistency in meta-analyses. BMJ 327:557–560

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Hofer JK, Gejo R, McGarry MH, Lee TQ (2011) Effects of kneeling on tibiofemoral contact pressure and area in posterior cruciate-retaining and posterior cruciate—sacrificing total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 27:620–624

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  16. In Y, Kim JM, Woo YK, Choi NY, Sohn JM, Koh HS (2009) Factors affecting flexion gap tightness in cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 24:317–321

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Insall JN, Lachiewicz PF, Burstein AH (1982) The posterior stabilized condylar prosthesis: a modification of the total condylar design. Two to four year clinical experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 64:1317–1323

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Matsuda Y, Takeda M, Kiga H, Toyabe S (2008) Range of motion during the perioperative period in total knee arthroplasty. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 128:795–799

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ishii Y, Noguchi H, Takeda M, Sato J, Toyabe S (2011) Prediction of range of motion 2 years after mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty: PCL-retaining versus PCL–sacrificing. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:2002–2008

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Jacobs WC, Clement DJ, Wymenga AB (2005) Retention versus sacrifice of the posterior cruciate ligament in total knee replacement for treatment of osteoarthritis and rheumatoid arthritis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev PMID:16235383

  21. Joglekar S, Gioe TJ, Yoon P, Schwartz MH (2012) Gait analysis comparison of cruciate retaining and substituting TKA following PCL sacrifice. Knee 19:279–285

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Kim YH, Choi Y, Kwon OR, Kim JS (2009) Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 91:753–760

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Kolisek FR, McGrath MS, Marker DR, Jessup N, Seyler TM, Mont MA, Lowry Barnes C (2009) Posterior-stabilized versus posterior cruciate ligament-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Iowa Orthop J 29:23–27

    PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Li PL, Zamora J, Bentley G (1999) The results at ten years of the Insall-Burstein II total knee replacement. Clinical, radiological and survivorship studies. J Bone Joint Surg Br 81:647–653

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Maher CG, Sherrington C, Herbert RD, Moseley AM, Elkins M (2003) Reliability of the PEDro scale for rating quality of randomized controlled trials. Phys Ther 83:713–721

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Maruyama S, Yoshiya S, Matsui N, Kuroda R, Kurosaka M (2004) Functional comparison of posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 19:349–353

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Matsumoto T, Kuroda R, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Mizuno K, Kurosaka M (2009) The intra-operative joint gap in cruciate-retaining compared with posterior-stabilised total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91:475–480

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Matsumoto T, Muratsu H, Kubo S, Matsushita T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2011) Soft tissue tension in cruciate-retaining and posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty. J Arthroplasty 26:788–795

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Mauerhan DR (2003) Fracture of the polyethylene tibial post in a posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty mimicking patellar clunk syndrome: a report of 5 cases. J Arthroplasty 2003(18):942–945

    Article  Google Scholar 

  30. Mikulak SA, Mahoney OM, dela Rosa MA, Schmalzried TP (2001) Loosening and osteolysis with the press-fit condylar posterior-cruciate-substituting total knee replacement. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:398–403

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Puloski SK, McCalden RW, MacDonald SJ, Rorabeck CH, Bourne RB (2001) Tibial post wear in posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty. An unrecognized source of polyethylene debris. J Bone Joint Surg Am 83:A390–A397

    Google Scholar 

  32. Rand JA, Trousdale RT, Ilstrup DM, Harmsen WS (2003) Factors affecting the durability of primary total knee prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85:259–265

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Rossi R, Bruzzone M, Bonasia DE, Marmotti A, Castoldi F (2010) Evaluation of tibial rotational alignment in total knee arthroplasty: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:889–893

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Saari T, Tranberg R, Zügner R, Uvehammer J, Kärrholm J (2004) The effect of tibial insert design on rising from a chair; motion analysis after total knee replacement. Clin Biomech (Bristol, Avon) 19:951–956

    Google Scholar 

  35. Saari T, Tranberg R, Zügner R, Uvehammer J, Kärrholm J (2004) Total knee replacement influences both knee and hip joint kinematics during stair climbing. Int Orthop 28:82–86

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Saari T, Uvehammer J, Carlsson LV, Regnér L, Kärrholm J (2006) Influence of polyethylene constraint on tibial component fixation in total knee arthroplasty: follow-up report after 5 years. J Arthroplasty 21:1032–1037

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Seon JK, Park JK, Shin YJ, Seo HY, Lee KB, Song EK (2011) Comparisons of kinematics and range of motion in high-flexion total knee arthroplasty: cruciate retaining versus substituting designs. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 93:2072–2078

    Google Scholar 

  38. Swanik CB, Lephart SM, Rubash HE (2004) Proprioception, kinesthesia, and balance after total knee arthroplasty with cruciate-retaining and posterior stabilized prostheses. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:328–334

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Takayama K, Matsumoto T, Kubo S, Muratsu H, Ishida K, Matsushita T, Kurosaka M, Kuroda R (2012) Influence of intra-operative joint gaps on post-operative flexion angle in posterior cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20:532–537

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Tanzer M, Smith K, Burnett S (2002) Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty: balancing the gap. J Arthroplasty 17:813–819

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  41. Thadani PJ, Vince KG, Ortaaslan SG, Blackburn DC, Cudiamat CV (2000) 10–12 year followup of the Insall-Burstein I total knee prosthesis. Clin Orthop Relat Res 380:17–29

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. van den Boom LG, Brouwer RW, van den Akker-Scheek I, Bulstra SK, van Raaij JJ (2009) Retention of the posterior cruciate ligament versus the posterior stabilized design in total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomized controlled clinical trial. BMC Musculoskelet Disord 10:119

    Article  PubMed Central  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Verhagen AP, de Vet HC, de Bie RA, Kessels AG, Boers M, Bouter LM, Knipschild PG (1998) The Delphi list: a criteria list for quality assessment of randomized clinical trials for conducting systematic reviews developed by Delphi consensus. J Clin Epidemiol 51:1235–1241

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Victor J, Banks S, Bellemans J (2005) Kinematics of posterior cruciate ligament-retaining and -substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective randomised outcome study. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:646–655

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  45. Wang CJ, Wang JW, Chen HS (2004) Comparing cruciate-retaining total knee arthroplasty and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a prospective clinical study. Chang Gung Med 27:578–585

    Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interest

All authors have contributed significantly and are in agreement with the content of the manuscript. All authors have no relevant financial relationships to disclose.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Department of Orthopedics, Zhongnan Hospital of Wuhan University, Wuhan, China

    Ning Li, Yang Tan, Yu Deng & Liaobin Chen

Authors
  1. Ning Li
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  2. Yang Tan
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  3. Yu Deng
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

  4. Liaobin Chen
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Liaobin Chen.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Li, N., Tan, Y., Deng, Y. et al. Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 22, 556–564 (2014). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2275-0

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2275-0

Keywords

Search

Navigation