Abstract
Purpose
Hip arthroscopy is known to have a steep learning curve by measuring operation times or complication rates. However, these measures are arbitrary and are based on the number of procedures performed rather than clinical outcomes. Recently, Cumulative sum (CUSUM) analysis has been used to monitor the performance of a single surgeon by evaluating clinical outcomes. Our purpose was to determine the learning curve for basic hip arthroscopy technique using CUSUM technique.
Methods
Forty consecutive patients who underwent hip arthroscopy were evaluated. Modified Harris Hip Score less than 80 at 6 months postoperatively was considered as treatment failure. Patients were chronologically stratified in two groups (the early group—cases 1–20, and the late group—cases 21–40), and age, gender, body mass index, and operation time were compared in both group. CUSUM analysis was then used to plot the learning curve.
Results
Eight patients (20 %) experienced treatment failure. Although there was no significant difference of treatment failure rate between the early and late groups (30 vs. 10 %, n.s.), the operation time was shorter in the late group (p = 0.014). In addition, CUSUM analysis showed that failure rates diminished rapidly after 21 cases and reached an acceptable rate after 30 cases.
Conclusions
Surgeon’s experience is an important predictor of failure after hip arthroscopy, and CUSUM analysis revealed that a learning period is required to become proficient at this procedure, and that experience of approximately 20 cases is required to achieve satisfactory outcomes in terms of clinical outcomes. Surgeon can use the present learning curve for self-monitoring and continuous quality improvement in hip arthroscopy.
Level of evidence
Retrospective case series, Level IV.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Byrd JW, Jones KS (2010) Prospective analysis of hip arthroscopy with 10-year followup. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:741–746
Callaghan JJ, Heekin RD, Savory CG, Dysart SH, Hopkinson WJ (1992) Evaluation of the learning curve associated with uncemented primary porous-coated anatomic total hip arthroplasty. Clin Orthop Relat Res 282:132–144
Fabricant PD, Heyworth BE, Kelly BT (2012) Hip arthroscopy improves symptoms associated with FAI in selected adolescent athletes. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:261–269
Garras DN, Crowder TT, Olson SA (2007) Medium-term results of the Bernese periacetabular osteotomy in the treatment of symptomatic developmental dysplasia of the hip. J Bone Joint Surg Br 89(6):721–724
Harris WH (1969) Traumatic arthritis of the hip after dislocation and acetabular fractures: treatment by mold arthroplasty. An end-result study using a new method of result evaluation. J Bone Joint Surg Am 51-A(4):737–755
Jaffer U, Cameron AE (2008) Laparoscopic appendectomy: a junior trainee’s learning curve. JSLS 12(3):288–291
Klingenstein GG, Martin R, Kivlan B, Kelly BT (2012) Hip injuries in the overhead athlete. Clin Orthop Relat Res 470:1579–1585
Konan S, Rhee SJ, Haddad FS (2011) Hip arthroscopy: analysis of a single surgeon’s learning experience. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(Suppl 2):52–56
Lodhia P, Slobogean GP, Noonan VK, Gilbart MK (2011) Patient-reported outcome instruments for femoroacetabular impingement and hip labral pathology: a systematic review of the clinimetric evidence. Arthroscopy 27(2):279–286
McCarthy JC, Jarrett BT, Ojeifo O, Lee JA, Bragdon CR (2011) What factors influence long-term survivorship after hip arthroscopy? Clin Orthop Relat Res 469:362–371
McCarthy JC, Lee J (2005) Hip arthroscopy: indications and technical pearls. Clin Orthop Relat Res 441:180–187
McCarthy JC, Lee JA (2004) Arthroscopic intervention in early hip disease. Clin Orthop Relat Res 429:157–162
McCarthy JC, Lee JA (2006) Hip arthroscopy: indications, outcomes, and complications. Instr Course Lect 55:301–308
Nunley RM, Zhu J, Brooks PJ, Engh CA Jr, Raterman SJ, Rogerson JS, Barrack RL (2010) The learning curve for adopting hip resurfacing among hip specialists. Clin Orthop Relat Res 468:382–391
Okrainec A, Ferri LE, Feldman LS, Fried GM (2011) Defining the learning curve in laparoscopic paraesophageal hernia repair: a CUSUM analysis. Surg Endosc 25(4):1083–1087
Philippon MJ, Briggs KK, Yen YM, Kuppersmith DA (2009) Outcomes following hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement with associated chondrolabral dysfunction: minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 91(1):16–23
Philippon MJ, Souza BG, Briggs KK (2012) Hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in patients aged 50 years or older. Arthroscopy 28(1):59–65
Philippon MJ, Yen YM, Briggs KK, Kuppersmith DA, Maxwell RB (2008) Early outcomes after hip arthroscopy for femoroacetabular impingement in the athletic adolescent patient: a preliminary report. J Pediatr Orthop 28(7):705–710
Sampson TG (2001) Complications of hip arthroscopy. Clin Sports Med 20(4):831–835
Schilders E, Dimitrakopoulou A, Bismil Q, Marchant P, Cooke C (2011) Arthroscopic treatment of labral tears in femoroacetabular impingement: a comparative study of refixation and resection with a minimum two-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 93(8):1027–1032
Souza BG, Dani WS, Honda EK, Ricioli W Jr, Guimaraes RP, Ono NK, Polesello GC (2010) Do complications in hip arthroscopy change with experience? Arthroscopy 26(8):1053–1057
Stevens MS, Legay DA, Glazebrook MA, Amirault D (2010) The evidence for hip arthroscopy: grading the current indications. Arthroscopy 26(10):1370–1383
Tolo VT (2011) Orthopaedic journals and conflict of interest. J Bone Joint Surg Am 93(23):2145
Williams SM, Parry BR, Schlup MM (1992) Quality control: an application of the cusum. BMJ 304(6838):1359–1361
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Lee, YK., Ha, YC., Hwang, DS. et al. Learning curve of basic hip arthroscopy technique: CUSUM analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 21, 1940–1944 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2241-x
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-012-2241-x