Skip to main content
Log in

MRI graduation of osseous reaction and drill hole consolidation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with PLLA anchors and the clinical relevance

  • Shoulder
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Conventionally, radiography studies revealed prolonged glenoidal drill hole visibilities with an unclear influence to the clinical outcome after arthroscopic Bankart repair using Poly-Laevo-Lactic-Acid (PLLA) anchors. The primary aim of the present study was the separated assessment of drill hole consolidation (DHC) and the concomitant osseous reaction (OR) of the glenoidal bio-degradation process in new specific magnetic resonance grading systems. In accordance with the specific DHC and the OR graduation, the clinical relevance was the secondary focus.

Methods

Twenty-eight patients with arthroscopic Bankart repair using knotless PLLA anchors were prospectively followed and analyzed using a clinical scoring system (3, 6, 15 and 32 months). The T2-weighted OR and T1-weighted DHC were assessed using specific magnetic resonance imaging grading protocols (15 and 32 months).

Results

Longitudinal assessments revealed successive clinical status improvements over time (32 months: Rowe 95.7 ± 3.8; Walch-Duplay 93.8 ± 6.6; Constant 93.9 ± 4.5; ASES 93.8 ± 6.9; DASH 28.6 ± 7.2; NASpain 1.1 ± 1.3; NASfunction 1.3 ± 1.4). The initial OR level regressed over the 15–32 month period while the DHC showed significant drill hole reductions (P < 0.05). The inferior glenoid revealed a significantly increased bio-degradation capacity (P < 0.05) with drill hole enlargements in 14.3%. Neither the OR nor the drill hole enlargements influenced the clinical status. In no case were clinical or radiologic signs for a foreign body reaction.

Conclusion

Knotless bio-anchors provide secure glenoidal fixation for Bankart repair without any specific clinical or MR evidence of an inflammatory response. The clinical status remained unaffected by the bio-degradation process.

Level of evidence

IV.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Athanasiou KA, Agrawal CM, Barber FA, Burkhart SS (1998) Orthopaedic applications for PLA-PGA biodegradable polymers. Arthroscopy 14:726–737

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  2. Athwal GS, Shridharani SM, O’Driscoll SW (2006) Osteolysis and arthropathy of the shoulder after use of bioabsorbable knotless suture anchors. A report of four cases. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:1840–1845

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Bach FD, Carlier RY, Elis JB et al (2002) Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with bioabsorbable polyglycolic acid interference screws: MR imaging follow-up. Radiology 225:541–550

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Barber FA (2007) Biodegradable shoulder anchors have unique modes of failure. Arthroscopy 23:316–320

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Barber FA, Coons DA, Ruiz-Suarez M (2008) Cyclic load testing and ultimate failure strength of biodegradable glenoid anchors. Arthroscopy 24:224–228

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Barber FA, Dockery WD, Hrnack SA (2011) Long-Term Degradation of a Poly-Lactide Co-Glycolide/beta-Tricalcium Phosphate Biocomposite Interference Screw. Arthroscopy 27:637–643

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Barber FA, Herbert MA, Beavis RC, Barrera Oro F (2008) Suture anchor materials, eyelets, and designs: update 2008. Arthroscopy 24:859–867

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Bostman OM, Laitinen OM, Tynninen O, Salminen ST, Pihlajamaki HK (2005) Tissue restoration after resorption of polyglycolide and poly-laevo-lactic acid screws. J Bone Joint Surg Br 87:1575–1580

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Bostman OM, Pihlajamaki HK (2000) Adverse tissue reactions to bioabsorbable fixation devices. Clin Orthop Relat Res 371:216–227

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Bottoni CR, Brooks DE, DeBerardino TM et al (2008) A comparison of bioabsorbable and metallic suture anchors in a dynamically loaded, intra-articular caprine model. Orthopedics 31:1106–1115

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  11. Burkart A, Imhoff AB, Roscher E (2000) Foreign-body reaction to the bioabsorbable suretac device. Arthroscopy 16:91–95

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Constant CR, Murley AH (1987) A clinical method of functional assessment of the shoulder. Clin Orthop Relat Res 214:160–164

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Edwards DJ, Hoy G, Saies AD, Hayes MG (1994) Adverse reactions to an absorbable shoulder fixation device. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 3:230–233

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Funck E et al (2000) A clinical and radiographic comparison of absorbable and non-absorbable suture anchors in open shoulder stabilisation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 8:349–355

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Ejerhed L, Kartus J, Funck E et al (2000) Absorbable implants for open shoulder stabilization: a clinical and serial radiographic evaluation. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 9:93–98

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Elmlund AO, Kartus J, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2009) A 7-Year Prospective, Randomized, Clinical, and radiographic study after arthroscopic bankart reconstruction using 2 different types of absorbable tack. Am J Sports Med 10:1930–1937

    Article  Google Scholar 

  17. Farrar DF, Gillson RK (2002) Hydrolytic degradation of polyglyconate B: the relationship between degradation time, strength and molecular weight. Biomaterials 23:3905–3912

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  18. Freehill MQ, Harms DJ, Huber SM, Atlihan D, Buss DD (2003) Poly-L-lactic acid tack synovitis after arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder. Am J Sports Med 31:643–647

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gohlke F, Daum P, Bushe C (1994) The stabilizing function of the glenohumeral joint capsule. Current aspects of the biomechanics of instability. Z Orthop Ihre Grenzgeb 132:112–119

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  20. Gohlke F, Schneider P, Siegel K, Balzer C (1993) Tensile strength of various anchor systems in surgical correction of instability of the shoulder joint. Unfallchirurg 96:546–550

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Gunja NJ, Athanasiou KA (2006) Biodegradable materials in arthroscopy. Sports Med Arthrosc 14:112–119

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hoffmann R, Weller A, Helling HJ, Krettek C, Rehm KE (1997) Local foreign body reactions to biodegradable implants. A classification. Unfallchirurg 100:658–666

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Hudak PL, Amadio PC, Bombardier C (1996) Development of an upper extremity outcome measure: the DASH (disabilities of the arm, shoulder and hand) [corrected]. The upper extremity collaborative group (UECG). Am J Ind Med 29:602–608

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  24. Jensen KU, Bongaerts G, Bruhn R, Schneider S (2009) Not all Rowe scores are the same! Which Rowe score do you use? J Shoulder Elbow Surg 18:511–514

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  25. Kartus C, Kartus J, Matis N, Forstner R, Resch H (2007) Long-term independent evaluation after arthroscopic extra-articular Bankart repair with absorbable tacks. A clinical and radiographic study with a seven to ten-year follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:1442–1448

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Kartus J, Ejerhed L, Funck E et al (1998) Arthroscopic and open shoulder stabilization using absorbable implants. A clinical and radiographic comparison of two methods. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 6:181–188

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  27. Kocaoglu B, Guven O, Nalbantoglu U, Aydin N, Haklar U (2009) No difference between knotless sutures and suture anchors in arthroscopic repair of Bankart lesions in collision athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:844–849

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Lehtinen JT, Tingart MJ, Apreleva M, Warner JJ (2004) Total, trabecular, and cortical bone mineral density in different regions of the glenoid. J Shoulder Elbow Surg 13:344–348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  29. Magnusson L, Ejerhed L, Rostgard L, Sernert N, Kartus J (2006) Absorbable implants for open shoulder stabilization. A 7–8-year clinical and radiographic follow-up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:182–188

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Magnusson L, Ejerhed L, Rostgard-Christensen L et al (2006) A prospective, randomized, clinical and radiographic study after arthroscopic Bankart reconstruction using 2 different types of absorbable tacks. Arthroscopy 22:143–151

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Marchant MH Jr, Willimon SC, Vinson E et al (2010) Comparison of plain radiography, computed tomography, and magnetic resonance imaging in the evaluation of bone tunnel widening after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:1059–1064

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Monteiro GC, Ejnisman B, Andreoli CV, Pochini AC, Cohen M (2008) Absorbable versus nonabsorbable sutures for the arthroscopic treatment of anterior shoulder instability in athletes: a prospective randomized study. Arthroscopy 24:697–703

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Mueller MB, Fredrich HH, Steinhauser E et al (2005) Biomechanical evaluation of different suture anchors for the stabilization of anterior labrum lesions. Arthroscopy 21:611–619

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  34. Muller M, Kaab MJ, Villiger C, Holzach P (2002) Osteolysis after open shoulder stabilization using a new bio-resorbable bone anchor: a prospective, non-randomized clinical trial. Injury 33 Suppl 2:B30-36

    Google Scholar 

  35. Nho SJ, Provencher MT, Seroyer ST, Romeo AA (2009) Bioabsorbable anchors in glenohumeral shoulder surgery. Arthroscopy 25:788–793

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Oh JH, Lee HK, Kim JY, Kim SH, Gong HS (2009) Clinical and Radiologic Outcomes of Arthroscopic Glenoid Labrum Repair With the BioKnotless Suture Anchor. Am J Sports Med 37:2340–2348

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Radford MJ, Noakes J, Read J, Wood DG (2005) The natural history of a bioabsorbable interference screw used for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with a 4-strand hamstring technique. Arthroscopy 21:707–710

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Richard JH, Bokor DJ (1998) Clinical evaluation of shoulder. In: Rockwood CA, Matsen FA (eds), The Shoulder :164-197

  39. Roth CA, Bartolozzi AR, Ciccotti MG et al (1998) Failure properties of suture anchors in the glenoid and the effects of cortical thickness. Arthroscopy 14:186–191

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  40. Rowe CR, Patel D, Southmayd WW (1978) The Bankart procedure: a long-term end-result study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 60:1–16

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. Take Y, Yoneda M, Hayashida K, Nakagawa S, Mizuno N (2008) Enlargement of drill holes after use of a biodegradable suture anchor: quantitative study on consecutive postoperative radiographs. Arthroscopy 24:251–257

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Tan CK, Guisasola I, Machani B et al (2006) Arthroscopic stabilization of the shoulder: a prospective randomized study of absorbable versus nonabsorbable suture anchors. Arthroscopy 22:716–720

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Thal R, Nofziger M, Bridges M, Kim JJ (2007) Arthroscopic Bankart repair using Knotless or BioKnotless suture anchors: 2- to 7-year results. Arthroscopy 23:367–375

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Warme WJ, Arciero RA, Savoie FH 3rd, Uhorchak JM, Walton M (1999) Nonabsorbable versus absorbable suture anchors for open Bankart repair. A prospective, randomized comparison. Am J Sports Med 27:742–746

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  45. Weiler A, Hoffmann RF, Stahelin AC, Helling HJ, Sudkamp NP (2000) Biodegradable implants in sports medicine: the biological base. Arthroscopy 16:305–321

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  46. Wetzler MJ, Bartolozzi AR, Gillespie MJ et al (1996) Fatigue properties of suture anchors in anterior shoulder reconstructions: Mitek GII. Arthroscopy 12:687–693

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Acknowledgments

The authors thank for the assistance of Dr. rer. med. Hanns Ackermann, Gamze Tercan and Géraldine Stein for collection and analyzing the data. The Magnetic Resonance Imaging was supported by a research fund of Arthrex (Naples, USA).

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to T. Stein.

Additional information

A. Jäger deceased.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Stein, T., Mehling, A.P., Ulmer, M. et al. MRI graduation of osseous reaction and drill hole consolidation after arthroscopic Bankart repair with PLLA anchors and the clinical relevance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 2163–2173 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1721-8

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1721-8

Keywords

Navigation