Abstract
Purpose
To determine collagen meniscus implant (CMI) efficacy for improving patient function, symptoms, and activity level. Study methodologies, rehabilitation, and return to sports guidelines were also reviewed.
Methods
MedLine, EMBASE, CINAHL, Life Science Citations, and Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials databases were searched from January 1995–May 2011 using the term collagen meniscal or meniscus implant. Only human studies with English language abstracts that reported patient outcomes were included. Modified Coleman Methodology criteria were used to score research quality.
Results
Eleven studies with 520 subjects (men = 428; women = 92; 17.7% women) of 38.2 ± 3.7 years of age met the inclusion criteria. Of these subjects, 321 (men = 263, women = 58; 18.1% women) received a CMI. Based primarily on Lysholm Knee Score, Tegner Activity Scale, pain scales and self-assessment measurements knee function, symptoms, and activity level generally improved by 46.6 ± 39.9 months post-surgery. Rehabilitation was described in 9/11 (81.8%) studies and four released patients to full activities at 6 months post-surgery. No study described how advanced rehabilitation or function testing contributed to return to activity decision-making. Research quality was generally low (67.1 ± 18.6) with widely ranging (29–97) scores. Reduced CMI size at last follow-up was reported in 6/11 (54.5%) studies, but the significance of this finding is unknown.
Conclusions
Knee function, symptoms, and activity level generally improved following CMI use, but poor research report quality was common. Additional well-designed long-term prospective studies are needed to better determine knee osteoarthrosis prevention efficacy and appropriate patient selection.
Similar content being viewed by others
References
Benthien JP, Schwaninger M, Behrens P (2010) We do not have evidence based methods for treatment of cartilage defects in the knee. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19:543–552
Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2006) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:698–705
Bulgheroni P, Murena L, Ratti C, Bulgheroni E, Ronga M, Cherubino P (2009) Follow-up of collagen meniscus implant patients: clinical, radiological, and magnetic resonance imaging results at 5 years. Knee 17:224–229
Buma P, van Tienen T, Veth R (2007) The collagen meniscus implant. Expert Rev Med Device 4:507–516
Coleman BD, Khan KM, Maffulli N, Cook JL, Wark JD (2000) Studies of surgical outcome after patellar tendinopathy: clinical significance of methodological deficiencies and guidelines for future studies. Scand J Med Sci Sports 10:2–11
Crawford K, Briggs KK, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2007) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the IKDC score for meniscus injuries of the knee. Arthroscopy 23:839–844
Dandy DJ (1990) The arthroscopic anatomy of symptomatic meniscal lesions. J Bone Joint Surg Br 72:628–633
Genovese E, Angeretti MG, Ronga M et al (2007) Follow-up of collagen meniscus implants by MRI. Radiol Med 112:1036–1048
Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2232–2239
Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm Knee Scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86:1139–1145
Linke RD, Ulmer M, Imhoff AB (2006) Replacement of the meniscus with a collagen implant [CMI]. Oper Orthop Traumatol 18:453–462
Lysholm J, Gillquist J (1982) Evaluation of knee ligament surgery results with special emphasis on the use of a scoring scale. Am J Sports Med 10:150–154
Menaflex Collagen Meniscus Implant (2006) Rehabilitation program summary for patients, surgeons, and physiotherapists. ReGen Biologics, Inc., Franklin Lakes, NJ, USA
Reguzzoni M, Manelli A, Ronga M, Raspanti M, Grassi FA (2005) Histology and ultrastructure of a tissue-engineered collagen meniscus before and after implantation. J Biomed Mater Res Part B Appl Biomater 74B:808–816
Rodkey WG, DeHaven KE, Montgomery WH III et al (2008) Comparison of the collagen meniscus implant with partial meniscectomy. A prospective randomized trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 90:1413–1426
Rodkey WG, Steadman JR, Li S-T (1999) A clinical study of collagen meniscus implants to restore the injured meniscus. Clin Orthop Relat Res 367(Suppl):S281–S292
Ronga M, Grassi FA, Manelli A, Bulgheroni P (2006) Tissue engineering techniques for the treatment of a complex knee injury. Arthroscopy 22:576e.1–576.e3
Steadman JR, Rodkey WG (2005) Tissue-engineered collagen meniscus implants: 5- to 6-year feasibility study results. Arthroscopy 21:515–525
Stone KR, Steadman JR, Rodkey WG, Li S-T (1997) Regeneration of meniscal cartilage with use of a collagen scaffold. Analysis of preliminary data. J Bone Joint Surg Am 79:1770–1777
Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49
van Tienen TG, Hannink G, Buma P (2009) Meniscus replacement using synthetic materials. Clin Sports Med 28:143–156
Zaffagnini S, Giordano G, Vascellari A et al (2007) Arthroscopic collagen meniscus implant results at 6 to 8 years follow up. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:175–183
Zaffagnini S, Marcheggiani Muccioli GM, Lopomo N et al (2011) Prospective long-term outcomes of the medial collagen meniscus implant versus partial medial meniscectomy. A minimum 10-years follow-up study. Am J Sports Med 39:977–985
Author information
Authors and Affiliations
Corresponding author
Rights and permissions
About this article
Cite this article
Harston, A., Nyland, J., Brand, E. et al. Collagen meniscus implantation: a systematic review including rehabilitation and return to sports activity. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 135–146 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1579-9
Received:
Accepted:
Published:
Issue Date:
DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1579-9