Skip to main content
Log in

Efficacy of immunohistological methods in detecting functionally viable mechanoreceptors in the remnant stumps of injured anterior cruciate ligaments and its clinical importance

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

Various histological and immunological methods have been used to detect the mechanoreceptors and nerve fibers on the intact ACLs as well as on the remnant stumps. However, some of these methods lack standardization, and the variable thickness of slices used often leads to misinterpretation. The study was based on the hypothesis that immunohistological methods are easier and more reliable means to demonstrate mechanoreceptors in the remnant ACL stumps as compared with the conventional methods. We also attempted to validate the methodology of immunohistology as a means of characterizing functional mechanoreceptors in the residual stump of an injured ACL.

Methods

The remnants of the ruptured ACL in 95 patients were harvested during arthroscopic ACL reconstruction and evaluated immunohistologically using hematoxylin and eosin (H&E), and monoclonal antibodies to S-100 and NFP. Multiple sections from each specimen were serially examined by two histologists.

Results

The positivity of monoclonal antibody against NFP showed a statistically significant relationship with the presence of morphologically normal mechanoreceptors, whereas the positivity of monoclonal antibody against S-100 showed a statistically significant relationship with the presence of free nerve ending in the residual stump of an injured ACL.

Conclusions

Immunological methods are more reliable and easier to use as compared with the conventional methods of histological staining for identifying remnant stumps likely to be of some proprioceptive benefit after an ACL injury. Such an identification might help us preserve certain remnant stumps during ACL reconstruction which might in turn improve the postoperative functional outcomes.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2
Fig. 3

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ryoke K, Kuriwaka M (2002) Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense. Acta Orthop Scand 73:330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Sumen Y (2000) Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation under arthroscopy. A minimum 2-year follow-up in 40 patients. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 120:128–133

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  3. Barrett DS (1991) Proprioception and function after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction. J Bone Joint Surg Br 73:833–837

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  4. Biedert RM, Stauffer E, Friederich NF (1992) Occurrence of free nerve endings in the soft tissue of the knee joint. A histologic investigation. Am J Sports Med 20:430–433

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  5. Borsa PA, Lephart SM, Irrgang JJ, Safran MR, Fu FH (1997) The effects of joint position and direction of joint motion on proprioceptive sensibility in anterior cruciate ligament—deficient athletes. Am J Sports Med 25:336–340

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  6. Del Valle ME, Harwin SF, Maestro A et al (1998) Immunohistochemical analysis of mechanoreceptors in the human posterior cruciate ligament: a demonstration of its proprioceptive role and clinical relevance. J Arthroplasty 13:916–922

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  7. Denti M, Monteleone M, Berardi A, Panni AS (1994) Anterior cruciate ligament mechanoreceptors. Clin Orthop Relat Res 308:29–32

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Dhillon MS, Bali K, Vasistha RK (2010) Immunohistological evaluation of the proprioceptive potential of the residual stump of an injured anterior cruciate ligament. Int Orthop 34:737–741

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Georgoulis AD, Pappa L, Moebius U et al (2001) The presence of proprioceptive mechanoreceptors in the remnants of ruptured ACL as possible source of reinnervation of ACL autograft. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 9:364–368

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  10. Halata Z, Rettig T, Schulze W (1985) The ultrastructure of sensory nerve endings in human knee joint capsule. Anat. Embryol(Berl) 172:265–275

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Hogervorst T, Brand RA (1998) Mechanoreceptors in joint function. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1365–1378

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  12. Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P (1991) A sensory role for the cruciate ligaments. Clin Orthop Relat Res 268:161–178

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Johansson H, Sjolander P, Sojka P (1991) Receptors in knee joint and their role in biomechanics of joint. Crit Rev Biomed Eng 18:341–368

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Kennedy JC, Alexander IJ, Hayes KC (1982) Nerve supply of the human knee and its functional importance. Am J Sports Med 10:329–335

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  15. Krauspe R, Schmidt M, Schaible HG (1992) Sensory innervation of the anterior cruciate ligament. An electrophysiological study of the response properties of single identified mechanoreceptors in the cat. J Bone Joint Surg Am 74:390–397

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Krauspe R, Schmitz F, Zöller G, Drenckhahn D (1995) Distribution of neurofilament-positive nerve fibres and sensory endings in the human anterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 114:194–198

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  17. Lee BI, Kwon SW, Kim JB et al (2008) Comparison of clinical results according to amount of preserved remnant in arthroscopic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction using quadrupled hamstring graft. Arthroscopy 24:560–568

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  18. Lee BI, Min KD, Choi HS et al (2009) Immunohistochemical study of mechanoreceptors in the tibial remnant of the ruptured anterior cruciate ligament in human knees. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:1095–1101

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Kanaya A (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:463.e1–5

    Google Scholar 

  20. Schultz RA, Miller DC, Kerr CS, Micheli L (1984) Mechanoreceptors in human cruciate ligaments. A histological study. J Bone Joint Surg Am 66:1072–1076

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  21. Schutte MJ, Dabezies EJ, Zimny ML, Happel LT (1987) Neural anatomy of the human anterior cruciate ligament. J Bone Joint Surg Am 69:243–247

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  22. Shimizu T, Takahashi T, Wada Y et al (1999) Regeneration process of mechanoreceptors in the reconstructed anterior cruciate ligament. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg 119:405–409

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  23. Zimny ML, Schutte M, Dabezies E (1986) Mechanoreceptors in the human anterior cruciate ligament. Anat Rec 214:204–209

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

Download references

Conflict of interests

The authors declare that they have no competing interests.

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Kamal Bali.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Bali, K., Dhillon, M.S., Vasistha, R.K. et al. Efficacy of immunohistological methods in detecting functionally viable mechanoreceptors in the remnant stumps of injured anterior cruciate ligaments and its clinical importance. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 20, 75–80 (2012). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1526-9

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-011-1526-9

Keywords

Navigation