Skip to main content
SpringerLink
Log in

The use of the Tegner Activity Scale for articular cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

Purpose

The Tegner Activity Scale (TAS) was developed in 1984 and has been widely used in studies on knee populations. The primary objective of this study was to undertake a systematic review on the use of the TAS for articular cartilage repair (ACR) of the knee.

Methods

A systematic review was conducted using electronic databases (MEDLINE, CINAHL, SPORTDiscus™, NHS Evidence, ISI Web of Knowledge, AMED, BNI, PEDro and The Cochrane Collaboration of Systematic Reviews) and reference lists from extracted articles. Studies were selected that were published between 1984 and 2009 in which the TAS was reported for patients who had undergone ACR of the knee.

Results

The search strategy identified 442 citations of which 34 articles met the inclusion criteria. There was a large degree of study heterogeneity especially regarding data reporting a wide variation in the number of participants (range 5–137), participant age (range 12–76 years), follow-up time (range 3–120 months) and male-to-female participant ratio. Where pre- to postoperative TAS change was analysed, 88% of studies demonstrated a significant improvement in postoperative TAS scores.

Conclusions

In general, TAS data were inconsistently reported and methodological detail was often lacking. Caution is advised in the interpretation of TAS scores following ACR of the knee where there are large ranges in postoperative follow-up times, mixed gender cohorts and wide ranges in participant ages. TAS data should be presented and analysed fully and ideally in a standardised fashion to facilitate the comparison of outcomes between studies.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Log in via an institution

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Institutional subscriptions

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Asik M, Ciftci F, Sen C, Erdil M, Atalar A (2008) The microfracture technique for the treatment of full-thickness articular cartilage lesions of the knee: midterm results. Arthroscopy 24:1214–1220

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Barber FA, Chow JC (2006) Arthroscopic chondral osseous autograft transplantation (COR procedure) for femoral defects. Arthroscopy 22:10–16

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Barber FA, Iwasko NG (2006) Treatment of grade III femoral chondral lesions: mechanical chondroplasty versus monopolar radiofrequency probe. Arthroscopy 22:1312–1317

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Behrens P, Bitter T, Kurz B, Russlies M (2006) Matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte transplantation/implantation (MACT/MACI)-5-year follow-up. Knee 13:194–202

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Briggs KK, Kocher MS, Rodkey WG, Steadman JR (2006) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee score and Tegner activity scale for patients with meniscal injury of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 88:698–705

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  6. Briggs KK, Lysholm J, Tegner Y, Rodkey WG, Kocher MS, Steadman JR (2009) The reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm score and Tegner activity scale for anterior cruciate ligament injuries of the knee: 25 years later. Am J Sports Med 37:890–897

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Briggs KK, Steadman JR, Hay CJ, Hines SL (2009) Lysholm score and Tegner activity level in individuals with normal knees. Am J Sports Med 37:898–901

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Brittberg M, Lindahl A, Nilsson A, Ohlsson C, Isaksson O, Peterson L (1994) Treatment of deep cartilage defects in the knee with autologous chondrocyte transplantation. N Engl J Med 331:889–895

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  9. Carifio J, Perla R (2008) Resolving the 50-year debate around using and misusing Likert scales. Med Educ 42:1150–1152

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Cherubino P, Grassi FA, Bulgheroni E, Ronga M (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using a bilayer collagen membrane: a preliminary report. J Ortho Surg 11:10–15

    CAS  Google Scholar 

  11. Davidson PA, Carter TR (2007) Osteochondral allograft transplantation. Oper Tech Sports Med 15:53–61

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Davidson PA, Rivenburgh DW, Dawson PE, Rozin R (2007) Clinical, histologic, and radiographic outcomes of distal femoral resurfacing with hypothermically stored osteoarticular allografts. Am J Sports Med 35:1082–1090

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Forrest M, Andersen B (1986) Ordinal scale and statistics in medical research. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed) 292:537–538

    Article  CAS  Google Scholar 

  14. Franceschi F, Longo UG, Ruzzini L, Marinozzi A, Maffulli N, Denaro V (2008) Simultaneous arthroscopic implantation of autologous chondrocytes and high tibial osteotomy for tibial chondral defects in the varus knee. Knee 15:309–313

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Frobell RB, Svensson E, Gothrick M, Roos EM (2008) Self-reported activity level and knee function in amateur football players: the influence of age, gender, history of knee injury and level of competition. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:713–719

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  16. Gigante A, Enea D, Greco F, Bait C, Denti M, Schonhuber H, Volpi P (2009) Distal realignment and patellar autologous chondrocyte implantation: mid-term results in a selected population. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 17:2–10

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  17. Glasziou P, Irwig L, Bain C, Colditz G (2001) Systematic reviews in health care: a practical guide. University of Cambridge, Cambridge

    Book  Google Scholar 

  18. Gobbi A, Francisco R (2006) Factors affecting return to sports after anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction with patellar tendon and hamstring graft: a prospective clinical investigation. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1021–1028

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  19. Gobbi A, Kon E, Berruto M, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Boldrini L, Bathan L, Marcacci M (2009) Patellofemoral full-thickness chondral defects treated with second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation: results at 5 years’ follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:1083–1092

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  20. Gobbi A, Nunag P, Malinowski K (2005) Treatment of full thickness chondral lesions of the knee with microfracture in a group of athletes. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:213–221

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  21. Halasi T, Kynsburg A, Tallay A, Berkes I (2004) Development of a new activity score for the evaluation of ankle instability. Am J Sports Med 32:899–908

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  22. Hambly K, Bobic V, Wondrasch B, Van Assche D, Marlovits S (2006) Autologous chondrocyte implantation postoperative care and rehabilitation: science and practice. Am J Sports Med 34:1020–1038

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  23. Hambly K, Griva K (2008) IKDC or KOOS? Which measures symptoms and disabilities most important to postoperative articular cartilage repair patients? Am J Sports Med 36:1695–1704

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  24. Horas U, Pelinkovic D, Herr G, Aigner T, Schnettler R (2003) Autologous chondrocyte implantation and osteochondral cylinder transplantation in cartilage repair of the knee joint. A prospective, comparative trial. J Bone Joint Surg Am 85-A:185–192

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  25. Jakobsen RB, Engebretsen L, Slauterbeck JR (2005) An analysis of the quality of cartilage repair studies. J Bone Joint Surg Am 87:2232–2239

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  26. Jakobsson U (2004) Statistical presentation and analysis of ordinal data in nursing research. Scand J Caring Sci 18:437–440

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  27. Jamieson S (2004) Likert scales: how to (ab)use them. Med Educ 38:1217–1218

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  28. Karataglis D, Learmonth DJA (2005) Management of big osteochondral defects of the knee using osteochondral allografts with the mega-oats technique. Knee 12:389–393

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  29. Kim MK, Choi SW, Kim SR, Oh IS, Won MH (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation in the knee using fibrin. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18:528–534

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  30. Knutsen G, Drogset JO, Engebretsen L, Grontvedt T, Isaksen V, Ludvigsen TC, Roberts S, Solheim E, Strand T, Johansen O (2007) A randomized trial comparing autologous chondrocyte implantation with microfracture. Findings at 5 years. J Bone Joint Surg Am 89:2105–2112

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  31. Kocher MS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Sterett WI, Hawkins RJ (2004) Reliability, validity, and responsiveness of the Lysholm knee scale for various chondral disorders of the knee. J Bone Joint Surg Am 86-A:1139–1145

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  32. Kon E, Gobbi A, Filardo G, Delcogliano M, Zaffagnini S, Marcacci M (2009) Arthroscopic second-generation autologous chondrocyte implantation compared with microfracture for chondral lesions of the knee: prospective nonrandomized study at 5 years. Am J Sports Med 37:33–41

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  33. Kumar V, Panagoupolous A, Triantafyllopoulos JK, van Niekerk L (2008) Two stage autologous chondrocyte implantation for large full thickness cartilage defects in high demand patients: results after 2 years follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br 90-B:324

    Article  Google Scholar 

  34. LaValley MP, Felson DT (2002) Statistical presentation and analysis of ordered categorical outcome data in rheumatology journals. Arthritis Rheum 47:255–259

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  35. Lunn PD (2010) The sports and exercise life-course: a survival analysis of recall data from Ireland. Soc Sci Med 70:711–719

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  36. Ma HL, Hung SC, Wang ST, Chang MC, Chen TH (2004) Osteochondral autografts transfer for post-traumatic osteochondral defect of the knee—2 to 5 years follow-up. Injury 35:1286–1292

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  37. Marcacci M, Kon E, Delcogliano M, Filardo G, Busacca M, Zaffagnini S (2007) Arthroscopic autologous osteochondral grafting for cartilage defects of the knee: prospective study results at a minimum 7-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 35:2014–2021

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  38. Marder RA, Hopkins G Jr, Timmerman LA (2005) Arthroscopic microfracture of chondral defects of the knee: a comparison of two postoperative treatments. Arthroscopy 21:152–158

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  39. Marx RG (2003) Knee rating scales. Arthroscopy 19:1103–1108

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  40. Marx RG, Stump TJ, Jones EC, Wickiewicz TL, Warren RF (2001) Development and evaluation of an activity rating scale for disorders of the knee. Am J Sports Med 29:213–218

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  41. McNickle AG, L’Heureux DR, Yanke AB, Cole BJ (2009) Outcomes of autologous chondrocyte implantation in a diverse patient population. Am J Sports Med 37:1344–1350

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  42. Miller BS, Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Rodkey WG (2004) Patient satisfaction and outcome after microfracture of the degenerative knee. J Knee Surg 17:13–17

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  43. Mithoefer K, Hambly K, Della Villa S, Silvers H, Mandelbaum BR (2009) Return to sports participation after articular cartilage repair in the knee: scientific evidence. Am J Sports Med 37:167S–176S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  44. Mithoefer K, Minas T, Peterson L, Yeon H, Micheli LJ (2005) Functional outcome of knee articular cartilage repair in adolescent athletes. Am J Sports Med 33:1147–1153

    Article  Google Scholar 

  45. Mithoefer K, Peterson L, Mandelbaum BR, Minas T (2005) Articular cartilage repair in soccer players with autologous chondrocyte transplantation: functional outcome and return to competition. Am J Sports Med 33:1639–1646

    Article  Google Scholar 

  46. Mithoefer K, Williams RJ 3rd, Warren RF, Wickiewicz TL, Marx RG (2006) High-impact athletics after knee articular cartilage repair: a prospective evaluation of the microfracture technique. Am J Sports Med 34:1413–1418

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  47. Moher D, Liberati A, Tetzlaff J, Altman DG (2009) Preferred reporting items for systematic reviews and meta-analyses: the PRISMA statement. J Clin Epidemiol 62:1006–1012

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  48. Norman G (2010) Likert scales, levels of measurement and the “laws” of statistics. Adv Health Sci Educ Theory Pract. doi:10.1007/s10459-010-9222-y

  49. Pascual-Garrido C, Slabaugh MA, L’Heureux DR, Friel NA, Cole BJ (2009) Recommendations and treatment outcomes for patellofemoral articular cartilage defects with autologous chondrocyte implantation: prospective evaluation at average 4-year follow-up. Am J Sports Med 37:33S–41S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  50. Paxton E, Fithian D, Stone M, Silva P (2003) The reliability and validity of knee-specific and general health instruments in assessing acute patellar dislocation outcomes. Am J Sports Med 31:487–492

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  51. Rangaswamy L (1998) Conversations with a cab driver. J Bone Joint Surg Am 80:1407–1409

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  52. Salzmann GM, Paul J, Bauer JS, Woertler K, Sauerschnig M, Landwehr S, Imhoff AB, Schottle PB (2009) T2 assessment and clinical outcome following autologous matrix-assisted chondrocyte and osteochondral autograft transplantation. Osteoarthr Cartil 17:1576–1582

    Article  PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  53. Smith TO, Davies L, O’Driscoll ML, Donell ST (2008) An evaluation of the clinical tests and outcome measures used to assess patellar instability. Knee 15:255–262

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  54. Spahn G, Kahl E, Muckley T, Hofmann GO, Klinger HM (2008) Arthroscopic knee chondroplasty using a bipolar radiofrequency-based device compared to mechanical shaver: results of a prospective, randomized, controlled study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 16:565–573

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  55. Spahn G, Kirschbaum S (2005) Operative treatment of deep chondral defects of the patella: Results after abrasive arthroplasty and periosteal arthroplasty. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 13:352–356

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  56. Steadman JR, Briggs KK, Rodrigo JJ, Kocher MS, Gill TJ, Rodkey WG (2003) Outcomes of microfracture for traumatic chondral defects of the knee: average 11-year follow-up. Arthroscopy 19:477–484

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  57. Sterett WI, Steadman JR (2004) Chondral resurfacing and high tibial osteotomy in the varus knee. Am J Sports Med 32:1243–1249

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  58. Stevens SS (1946) On the theory of scales of measurement. Science 103:677–680

    Article  Google Scholar 

  59. Suk M, Hanson BP, Norvell DC, Helfet DL (2005) AO handbook: musculoskeletal outcomes measures and instruments. Thieme, Davos Platz

    Google Scholar 

  60. Tegner Y (1985) Cruciate ligament injuries in the knee: Evaluation and rehabilitation. Dissertation, Linköping University, Linköping, Sweden

  61. Tegner Y, Lysholm J (1985) Rating systems in the evaluation of knee ligament injuries. Clin Orthop Relat Res 198:43–49

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  62. Tetta C, Busacca M, Moio A, Rinaldi R, Delcogliano M, Kon E, Filardo G, Marcacci M, Albisinni U (2009) Knee osteochondral autologous transplantation: long-term MR findings and clinical correlations. Eur J Radiol. doi:10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.05.011

  63. Thomee P, Wahrborg P, Borjesson M, Thomee R, Eriksson BI, Karlsson J (2007) Self-efficacy, symptoms and physical activity in patients with an anterior cruciate ligament injury: a prospective study. Scand J Med Sci Sports 17:238–245

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  64. Visna P, Pasa L, Cizmar I, Hart R, Hoch J (2004) Treatment of deep cartilage defects of the knee using autologous chondrograft transplantation and by abrasive techniques—a randomized controlled study. Acta Chir Belg 104:709–714

    PubMed  CAS  Google Scholar 

  65. Wallgren K, Norlin R, Gillquist J (1987) Activity score for the evaluation of orthopedic patients. Acta Orthop Scand 58:453

    Google Scholar 

  66. Weitzel P, Richmond J (2002) Critical evaluation of different scoring systems of the knee. Sports Med Arthrosc Rev 10:183–190

    Article  Google Scholar 

  67. Wondrasch B, Zak L, Welsch GH, Marlovits S (2009) Effect of accelerated weightbearing after matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation on the femoral condyle on radiographic and clinical outcome after 2 years: a prospective, randomized controlled pilot study. Am J Sports Med 37:88S–96S

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  68. Zeifang F, Oberle D, Nierhoff C, Richter W, Moradi B, Schmitt H (2009) Autologous chondrocyte implantation using the original periosteum-cover technique versus matrix-associated autologous chondrocyte implantation: a randomized clinical trial. Am J Sports Med 38:924–933

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

  1. Centre for Sports Studies, Medway Building, University of Kent, Chatham Maritime, Kent, ME4 4AG, UK

    Karen Hambly

  2. Faculty of Life Sciences, London Metropolitan University, London, UK

    Karen Hambly

Authors
  1. Karen Hambly
    View author publications

    You can also search for this author in PubMed Google Scholar

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Karen Hambly.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Hambly, K. The use of the Tegner Activity Scale for articular cartilage repair of the knee: a systematic review. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 19, 604–614 (2011). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1301-3

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1301-3

Keywords

Search

Navigation