Skip to main content
Log in

Augmentation technique for partial ACL ruptures using semitendinosus tendon in the over-the-top position

  • Knee
  • Published:
Knee Surgery, Sports Traumatology, Arthroscopy Aims and scope

Abstract

The aim of this study is to present a surgical augmentation technique for partial ACL ruptures in which an isolated, autologous, double-bundle semitendinosus tendon graft is passed over the top of the femur, thus fully preserving the still-intact fibers of the ligament remnant. Between 1992 and 2006, 24 patients underwent ACL semitendinosus autograft reconstruction and were followed up for at least 2 years. The median follow-up was 6.2 years (2–15.6). At the last follow-up examination, the patients were evaluated using the International Knee Documentation Committee scale. Subjective and functional parameters were assessed using the Tegner activity scale and the Lysholm scale. Instrumental evaluation was carried out using the KT-1000 instrument. Sixteen of the 24 patients achieved an IKDC score of A. Of the remaining eight patients, six achieved an IKDC score of B, one an IKDC score of C, and one an IKDC score of D. According to the Tegner activity scale, the median pre-injury sports activity level was seven (5–9) and the median post-injury level was six (4–9), while the mean Lysholm scale score was 95 (90–100). Clinical and biomechanical studies have shown that reconstruction techniques that address both bundles of the ACL provide better rotational stability than techniques that address only a single bundle. Therefore, it seems logical than in patients with a partial rupture of the ACL, the intact bundle could be preserved and only the torn bundle would need to be reconstructed.

This is a preview of subscription content, log in via an institution to check access.

Access this article

Price excludes VAT (USA)
Tax calculation will be finalised during checkout.

Instant access to the full article PDF.

Fig. 1
Fig. 2

Similar content being viewed by others

References

  1. Adachi N, Ochi M, Uchio Y, Iwasa J, Ryoke K, Kuriwaka M (2002) Mechanoreceptors in the anterior cruciate ligament contribute to the joint position sense knee. Acta Orthop Scand 73:330–334

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  2. Bak K, Scavenius M, Hansen S et al (1997) Isolated partial rupture of the anterior cruciate ligament. Long term follow-up of 56 cases. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 5:66–71

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  3. Buda R, Ferruzzi A, Vannini F (2006) Augmentation technique with semitendinosus and gracilis tendons in chronic partial lesions of the ACL: clinical and arthrometric analysis. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 14:1101–1107

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  4. Buda R, Di Caprio F, Giuriati L (2008) Partial ACL ruptures augmented with distally inserted hamstring tendons and over-the-top fixation: an MRI evaluation. Knee 15:111–116

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  5. Cohen SB, Fu FH (2007) Three-portal technique for anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: use of a central medial portal. Arthroscopy 23:325.e1–325.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  6. Finsterbush A, Frankl U, Mann G (1989) Fat pad adhesion to partially torn anterior cruciate ligament: a cause of knee locking. Am J Sports Med 17:92–95

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  7. Kocher MS, Micheli LJ, Zurakowski D, Luke A (2002) Partial ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament in children and adolescents. Am J Sports Med 30:697–703

    PubMed  Google Scholar 

  8. Lintner DM, Kamaric E, Moseley JB, Noble PC (1995) Partial ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. Are they clinically detectable? Am J Sports Med 23:111–118

    Article  CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  9. Noyes FR, Mooar LA, Moorman CT III (1989) Patial ruptures of the anterior cruciate ligament. Progression to complete ligament deficiency. J Bone Joint Surg Br 71:825–833

    CAS  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  10. Ochi M, Adachi N, Deie M, Kanaya A (2006) Anterior cruciate ligament augmentation procedure with a 1-incision technique: anteromedial bundle or posterolateral bundle reconstruction. Arthroscopy 22:463.e1–463.e5

    Article  Google Scholar 

  11. Petersen W, Zantop T (2006) Anatomy of the anterior cruciate ligament with regard to its two bundles. Clin Orthop Relat Res 454:35–47

    Article  Google Scholar 

  12. Steckel H, Vadala G, Davis D, Musahl V, Fu FH (2007) FH3-T MR imaging of partial ACL ruptures: a cadaver study. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 15:1066–1071

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  13. Yao L, Gentili A, Petrus L (2005) Partial ACL rupture: an MR diagnosis? Skeletal Radiol 24:247–251

    Google Scholar 

  14. Yasuda K, Kondo E, Ichiyama H (2006) Clinical evaluation of anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciata ligament reconstruction proceder using hamstring tendon grafts: comparisons among 3 different procedures. Arthroscopy 22:240–251

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

  15. Zantop T, Wellmann M, Fu FH, Petersen W (2008) Tunnel positioning of anteromedial and posterolateral bundles in anatomic anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: anatomic and radiographic findings. Am J Sports Med 36:65–72

    Article  PubMed  Google Scholar 

Download references

Author information

Authors and Affiliations

Authors

Corresponding author

Correspondence to Jose Miguel Serrano-Fernandez.

Rights and permissions

Reprints and permissions

About this article

Cite this article

Serrano-Fernandez, J.M., Espejo-Baena, A., Martin-Castilla, B. et al. Augmentation technique for partial ACL ruptures using semitendinosus tendon in the over-the-top position. Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc 18, 1214–1218 (2010). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1068-6

Download citation

  • Received:

  • Accepted:

  • Published:

  • Issue Date:

  • DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s00167-010-1068-6

Keywords

Navigation